Preview

Roman Empire Thesis

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
13846 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Roman Empire Thesis
Mauryan/Gupta India (320 BCE - 550 CE) and The Roman Empire (31 BCE - 476 CE) had very distinct methods of political control based on everything from geographic limitations and cultural reasons. Many factors were present affecting differences and similarities between the two. For starters, unity was difficult in india because of its geography that created sort of a seperation. however, the geography made it more open to outer influences like the Aryans. rome was more or less unified geographically, as it had many rolling hills instead of mountain ranges in parts of india. The speration in india resulted in many things like languages, no continous bureaucracy, and no sense of political service. whereas the roman empire, though divided into many city states, there was the common language of latin, and the well organized government that had a good political system, but it still lacked unity. so both empires had limitations in the sense of unification but rome was better for organizing systems geographically.
Mauryan/Gupta India (320 BCE - 550 CE) and The Roman Empire (31 BCE - 476 CE) had very distinct methods of political control based on everything from geographic limitations and cultural reasons. Many factors were present affecting differences and similarities between the two. For starters, unity was difficult in india because of its geography that created sort of a seperation. however, the geography made it more open to outer influences like the Aryans. rome was more or less unified geographically, as it had many rolling hills instead of mountain ranges in parts of india. The speration in india resulted in many things like languages, no continous bureaucracy, and no sense of political service. whereas the roman empire, though divided into many city states, there was the common language of latin, and the well organized government that had a good political system, but it still lacked unity. so both empires had limitations in the sense of unification but rome was

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    During the late classical period from 206 B.C.E to 476 C.E., the Roman Empire controlled the Mediterranean world and the Han Dynasty stretched from the Yellow River to the South China Sea. Although the Romans and Han empires used powerful militaries and infrastructure to control the peasants and fend off invasions, they differed in the structure and organization of their bureaucracies and the control that the emperors had over the governors of the provinces.…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Whereas Han China from 206 B.C.E. to 220 B.C.E. and the imperial Rome from 31 B.C.E. to 476 C.E. had shared similarities on the territorial boundaries issues, the two empires had different political over the huge amount of land. Known as most powerful empires in history, Han China and Rome utilized idiosyncractic policy to maintain the sovereignty. However, the two states both suffered from the border disputes.…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The political structure of both Han China and Mauryan/Gupta India were distinct because Han China focused…

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both empires established effective centralized governmental control over their vast regions and huge populations. But the Chinese, in opposition to the Romans,…

    • 644 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Roman and Han empires were similar in their falls because of they both fell to nomadic invaders. Nomads attacked the empires to try and conquer them. The Romans were attacked by Germanic tribes and Han China was attacked by the Huns. Because both empires borders were so large, they were unable to fully protect their borders making it easy for their invaders to defeat them. The Han and the Roman Empires failing due to nomadic invaders is similar to the fall of the Gupta because one of the main reasons they fell was because of nomadic invaders conquering them and then splitting them up into regional kingdoms.…

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Roman and Han Empires were the most powerful empires among the Classical Empires. Between the fifth century B.C.E. and the fifth century C.E., the Roman empire of the Mediterranean and the Han Empire of China were both influential powers of the Classical Asian and Mediterranean worlds. The Han Dynasty and Roman Empire were similar in their falls because they both fell to nomadic invaders, and because they both fell because of a decline in economic trade. The Han and the Roman Empires were different in their falls because the Han suffered from serious revolts whereas the Romans did not; also the effects of their falls were different because China was able to make a fairly quick comeback whereas Rome was never able to do so.…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Han and Rome Comparison

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Though both empires had similar causes for declines, they had different political systems that caused the empires to rise to power. The Han dynasty was built on Legalism, while the Roman empire was built on a republic government. Legalism consisted of strict obedience of the equally applied law, which kept everyone, no matter political, economic or social status, in check. Because the system of the law ran the state, it created a stable political system even when the ruler was weak. Under legalism, success became based on skill and not contacts, so there were more qualified people in office. In the Roman Republic government, the Assembly (the common man) voted each year to elect two new members of the Senate ( the noble and wealthy man). This created a separation of powers that kept internal conflicts at bay. This allowed for Rome to focus more on expansions.…

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although both Han China and Imperial Rome had large, long lasting empires with similar economies and some similar policies centralized governments and similar administrative policies regarding land reform, their techniques of imperial administration differed in terms of how it came to be and how emperors ruled.…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    These two giant empires were able to reach great heights, but they differed in origin. The Han Dynasty was created when Liu Bang pulled the state back together after the near collapse of the Qin dynasty. (Dunn and Mitchell 202) Rome had a much more humble beginning. “When Rome emerged as a republican city-state in late sixth century B.C.E., the peoples of Italy were mostly farmers.”(Dunn and Mitchell 193) These contrasting origins forced these empires to use different methods to maintain their rule.…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While the empires lasted during the same time, they were located on completely different land areas. Rome had the Mediterranean, was hilly, with lots of rivers. Natural protections with their central location, and able to utilize their manpower resources of Italy. While Han China had rivers, plateau, deserts, mountains, was plain-fertile but needed…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rome and Han China were classical civilizations that built centralized empires, which eventually expanded. Both Rome and Han experienced unequal land distribution which led to political instability, and both suffered from invasions of nomadic tribes due to political instability which would lead to the collapse. However, only the western portion of the Roman Empire collapsed whereas the entire Han met its demise.…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They both had a emperor claiming divine authority, a small bureaucracy, and divided into provinces. But in the Gupta they gave their local officials in the provinces power, and the Roman emperors still had complete control over the provinces. The Roman emperors even put statues of them in the provinces to remind the people who controlled them. Finally, the Roman and Gupta empires had very similar platforms to their political control, but their actual control differed in a couple…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Secondly, ancient Rome and Han China both shared political views. The political structures of both were based on very well organized bureaucratic systems with strong monarchy sets of succession. These were two of the most dominant empires of Ancient Europe and Asia. They arose from small states,but with lots of discipline and military toughness, took power over small and quarreling neighbors. However Rome's military was much more powerful in all criteria.…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The traditional dates for the Roman Republic are 509 to 27 B.C. The latter part of this period from 133 to 27 B.C. is known as the late Republic. It is also known as the Roman Revolution. The result of this revolution was the emergence of the Roman Empire and the catalyst has traditionally been linked to a single Roman citizen called Tiberius Gracchus. The wake of his brief political career left Rome much different than it had been. Like a crack in the wall of a dam, Tiberius revealed a weakness in the Roman system of government that would soon spider out of control until it could no longer hold back the deluge of the building political tension. What was this weakness?…

    • 2567 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In order to have had an empire, of course, both civilizations had very strong and autocratic central governments. This allowed for a powerful and an ever-expanding kingdom. This expansionary military needed a way to travel, thus was the reason for creating a road system. The basic foundation for the military and government may appear to be similar on the surface, but they actually were quite different. The Roman army, for one, was a more experienced and privileged group of men who held higher ranks in the class system. These men, along with the senate also played a vital role in the picking of an emperor and maintained a great deal of loyalty to him. The senate was typically the center of power for the Roman Empire, anyway. In the Han dynasty, however, the ruler was hereditary and he had to appeal, persuade, and even threaten to achieve agreement with him. The military was certainly less loyal and less likely to struggle for power, mostly due to the fact that the soldiers were newly drafted and had little experience. China had two capital cities, Luoyang in the east, and Chang'an in the West, that served as seats of power for emporers. The middle class was free from government constraints in Rome, which allowed for economic mobility. This was not the case for the Han as the merchant class was restricted by the government. The imperial model of these two societies managed only to revive in China some years later; however, the same cannot be stated for Rome.…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays