Preview

Roman Army

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
470 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Roman Army
Why was the Roman Army so Successful? The Roman Army was one of the most successful armies in the past as they conquered most of the land in Europe. There were very successful because of their excellent organization, strict recruitment policy, hard training, well equipped armors and equipment and intelligent tactics. Recruitment was the first important process to recruit good men to join the army. The selection process was strict. The man was aged between 18 to 25 and had to be a Roman citizen. They was slim, and muscular, be healthy, with good eyesight and good hearing as well. They had to be at least 5 feet 9 inches, brave, obeyed, well discipline. Once the men were selected, they would start the rigorous training. The training process was hard and tough. Training for the Roman Army required lots of strength because they had to train with weapons as twice as heavy as the real one. They were also trained to build bridges, roads and buildings. They were trained to be strong, effective in the battles. The Roman Army wore protective armour, which consisted of breastplates, shoulder armour, chain mail and a helmet. This also included neck, cheek and head protection. The amour was hard and heavy and it helped Roman Army to succeed in the battle as it was well protective and defensive. The Roman Army were always well equipped for battles. They had a short sword, and a spear. These weapons helped Roman Army to succeed because all the soldiers were trained well to use them. The Roman Army use the weapons wisely and the soldiers were taught to use tactics in the battle. One of the famous tactics was called Tesudo (tortoise). The soldiers were closed together and formed a shell around themselves by using their scutums. The curved shape of their shields enabled them to protect themselves and on the other hand, allowed the soldiers to step in front to look out for the enemies. The tactics were also very important to make Roman Army to succeed. The

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Because of the recent movie, 300, most people are aware of the epic battle that occurred at Thermopylai were 300 odd Spartans supposedly held off an army of over one million led by Xerxes I. Now, there were many errors in the movie (the number of men on both sides being the chiefest of them). But it still leaves many people asking how a force so drastically outnumbered was able to hold a force nearly twenty times their number. The answer lies in the difference in their equipment, tactics and their training.…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the Roman Emperor Augustus came to power in 27 BC it was after a period of civil war that lasted over 70 years following the death of Julius Caesar. Rome had 50 legions at this time, and number that would have put too great a financial strain on the Roman coffers. Augustus also feared for the loyalty of these legion due to the fact that many legionaries prior to the civil war had given their loyalty to the legion’s commander and not the state. During this time Augustus also limited Rome’s territorial ambitions choosing the secure its gains and to not expand it much further, thus making it more unmanageable both administratively and financially.…

    • 1457 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The strengths of Sparta are that they had an advanced military, they respected and trained the women, and they trained the soldiers when the soldiers when they were young. The phalanx was a very large rectangular mass which was composed with with heavy armory,spears, and all other weapons whilst pushing forward. Although they lacked formal education, they took down all of the strongest city states…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Without a strong army a nation that is surrounded by nomadic tribes that are ambitious to conquer them are doomed. The Roman army wasn’t at all strong because according to Montanelli (D5) their army was composed by foreigners, these German mercenaries were unskilled and felt little or no loyalty towards the Emperor. Also, according to Strayer, Gatzke, and Harbison (D1) an overwhelming majority of the Roman population believed the old civilization wasn’t worth saving. Therefore, they didn’t have the desire to protect the nation and serve in the army. A country’s military directly influences the welfare of its nation; this is why the Roman Army’s incompetence led them to their…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Between 600 BCE and 600 CE, many empires throughout the world rose to power as a result of powerful military organizations that allowed them to defend themselves and conquer new land. Forceful armies were especially important in both Rome and Greece, where their dynamic military permitted them to dominate and expand their territories, thus increasing their empire’s power and influence. Most notably in the Roman Empire, the strong martial force led the state to victory in several battles, including the Battle of Zama. The empire’s powerful military obliterated Carthage and led to Rome subsequently taking control of the area. As a result of winning such battles, Rome took control of more land and expanded its territory to take over much of Southern…

    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Though this would be the primary dominate force on the battlefield, Rome actually lost battles because they were primarily heavy infantry. Roman soldiers adopted fighting tactics of other forces and enemies to become the most elite force on the battle field. Starting out, soldiers fought like the Greek worriers known as hoplites. Hoplites were essentially an infantry man armed with a shield and spear, which were on reserve until called to battle. The tactics that were adopted from the Hoplites was a formation called the Phalanx. This formation consisted of soldiers lining up shoulder to shoulder with their weapon in one hand and shield in the opposite. Not only did this help with shields protecting one another, it made lines impenetrable for arrows, spears and enemy as long as they maintained a solid line side by side.2…

    • 1788 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Suetonius Battle Analysis

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages

    They expected to easily slice the outnumbered enemy into pieces, but they were unnoticeably channeled into a tight pack (). The Romans had two great advantages on their side, they were much more skilled in the tactics and arts of battle and they also had the position on the defensive. Roman soldiers were accustomed to defending themselves while attacking fortified positions by forming up in a tight phalanx formation, the men positioned shoulder to shoulder, their shields creating one great continuous shield, a mobile walled fortification. Boudicca’s spear throwers, hurling their weapons uphill, were wholly ineffective. The spears that made contact with the Roman force bounced harmlessly off the impenetrable shield barrier.…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hoplites Inventory

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Hoplites Inventory Edward Rodriguez 12-4-15 Belen Jesuit Prep Honors World History Dr. Tudela During Ancient Greek times there were different types of infantry used in battles. The different types of infantry were: hoplites, light troops and calvary. The light troops were sling throwers, archers and peltasts. The calvary were not a common infantry they would use because of the way they were limited by terrain and cost.…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Being an honorable, courageous and bold soldier is regarded as having Roman warlike virtues and following the Roman warrior code. Bret and Kate McKay believed that ‘manliness meant living a life of virtue’ in ancient Rome. Furthermore they explain that virtue refers to having ‘masculine strength’. Volumnia would “rather have eleven [sons] die nobly” than one son enjoy a peaceful life, this shows that fighting in a war was regarded as nobility and superiority, and shows it is more acceptable in Rome to fight in war than to be a noncombatant. Rome is a very violent society – they valued military prowess.…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In document D it says “ The Spartans learned to read and write for purely practical reasons: all other forms of education the banned from the country, books and treatises being included in as much as [foreign teachers].” This is a weakness because there strategies were not strong because they didn’t have the knowledge, they only had the strength. So during battle, they can only fight with strength but, whoever they are battling will have knowledge and strategy. How are we supposed to last long in battle when we are hurt but have no strategy to keep fighting?…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    most disciplined and most effective army of his time."He trained his men to be masters…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Arch Of Tini

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Lucero Hernandez CL/HS 231-1 9/11/13 On-site report History of Ancient Rome and Italy The Arch of Titus Studying abroad in Rome as a Christian has been one of the most influential experiences so far. Not only religiously since Rome is known as the capital of Christianity, but historically because of I had the chance to see in person the most important monuments and buildings that commemorated the power of the Roman Empire. A symbol of historical, and religious power can be found at the Arch of Titus.…

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The book called "Concerning Military Matters" states that the soldiers got lazy and negligence and because of this the soldiers did not want to wear there breast plates and helmets. Because of this the Roman Fighters were prone to more wounds because of the lack of protective equipment. "Concerning Military Matters" says " Thus, it happens that troops in battle, exposed to wounds because they have no armor, think about running but not fighting." This statement is saying that the soldiers were exposed to the battle wounds and were more ready to run but not even think about fighting or that they might get hurt. The military problems contributes to the fall of Rome by showing that the army was getting weaker and dying off faster due to poor choices made by the…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Roman army was very mighty. Because of this they were able to expand their territory. At the height of their power they were able to conquer what we now call Wales, Spain, France, the Middle East, Greece, most of Germany, and the northern coast of Africa. Historians view the roman army as an extremely effective fighting machine. The lowest level soldier in the Roman army was a legionnaire. 5000 to 6000 legionnaires made up a legion. They were trained to fight in a disciplined and coordinated manner. If they didn’t fight well, they would be punished. Even if they won the battle. Their training was brutal. They had three main primary weapons. The Pilum was similar to a javelin and was thrown at the enemy. The main purpose of the Pilum was…

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Romans had lots of different armor. They wore leg guards made of all different metals. They had belts meant to frighten the enemy with jangling sounds. Their helmets had cheek guards and they had iron…

    • 231 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays