Roman Archaeology Essay
Roman archaeology, being the attractive subject it is, is in good condition as an institution. Over the years the discipline has been better at circulating information widely. Publication and fieldwork have increased in quality. Roman archaeology has found itself with strong leadership in the academic community. With commitment from academia and the energy combined with creativity of researchers from a variety of institutions such as universities, museums, etc. The increase of activity has, however, led to a marked degree of specialization. The effects are more obvious in some national traditions than others. Anglophone scholars in particular have not produced the same works of analytical synthesis as have either their Hellenist colleagues
…show more content…
Eleanor Scott, went on record to say she noticed a “fierce resistance” to theory in Roman archaeology (Lodwick and Rohl, 2016). Steve Dyson, in particular, was one of the the first Roman archaeologists identify that often it is a better position to engage in questions deriving from anthropology than it is to undertake prehistorians or archaeologists of societies without writing (Dyson 1981). Today the group, as is Dr. Scott, is still active, holding annual conferences and maintaining a digital footprint with their own webpage. On their site, TRAC outlines its aims as a group. First and foremost, the group is to promote the discussion and role of theory in Roman Archaeology. Second, the group should provide a forum for senior academics, professionals, young scholars, students, the wider archaeological community, etc. to discussion and debate amongst themselves. Third, the group is to embrace and engage and value a diverse community. Forth, the group will organize a conference or conferences annually in response to carry out TRAC’s goals. Finally, the group is to produce a series of publications acquired from the conferences and any additional
Eleanor Scott, went on record to say she noticed a “fierce resistance” to theory in Roman archaeology (Lodwick and Rohl, 2016). Steve Dyson, in particular, was one of the the first Roman archaeologists identify that often it is a better position to engage in questions deriving from anthropology than it is to undertake prehistorians or archaeologists of societies without writing (Dyson 1981). Today the group, as is Dr. Scott, is still active, holding annual conferences and maintaining a digital footprint with their own webpage. On their site, TRAC outlines its aims as a group. First and foremost, the group is to promote the discussion and role of theory in Roman Archaeology. Second, the group should provide a forum for senior academics, professionals, young scholars, students, the wider archaeological community, etc. to discussion and debate amongst themselves. Third, the group is to embrace and engage and value a diverse community. Forth, the group will organize a conference or conferences annually in response to carry out TRAC’s goals. Finally, the group is to produce a series of publications acquired from the conferences and any additional