Preview

Role of the Author: New Criticism and Poststructuralism

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1158 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Role of the Author: New Criticism and Poststructuralism
Role of the Author: New Criticism and Poststructuralism This paper studies the role of the author from the perspectives of New Criticism and Poststructuralism. The nature of the two critical approaches must be elucidated before the discussion. According to ‘The Norton Introduction to Literature’, New Critics’ critical practice is to demonstrate formal unity by showing how every part of a work contributes to a central unifying theme. Every part is related to the whole and the whole is reflected in each part. This ‘organic unity’ is different from ‘mechanic unity’, the external, perceived structure or rules that arise not from the individuality of the work, but from the type or genre. As they focus on theme or meaning as well as form, the New Critics see literature referential, pointing to something outside itself, things in real, external world or in human experience. In general, the New Critics do not question the reality of the phenomenal world or the ability of language to represent it. Poststructuralism is the broad term used to designate the several directions of literary criticism that attacks the very idea that any kind of certitude can exist about the meaning, understandability or shareability of texts. Poststructuralists ultimately doubt the possibility of certainties of any kind and see language as especially elusive and unfaithful. Therefore, close reading, in which text itself is the only focus, is not a preferable practice in poststructuralism. Much of poststructuralism involves undoing, i.e. deconstruction. Unlike structuralism and New Criticism, deconstruction denies that the verbal world adds up to anything coherent, consistent, or meaningful in itself.

The similarity between the two approaches on the role of the author Both New Criticism and Poststructuralism belong to Objectivism, thinking of literature as a ‘fixed and freestanding object made up of words on a page’ (Beaty et al. A18). Therefore, a literary work has very little or even

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In Graff’s chapter 15 “On Closer Examination”, he explains different ways to interpret writings. Graff speaks about literary criticism and literary analysis. Instead of critics making comments about work they actually help debate and continue writings. Graff writes “Literary critics after all don’t make assertions about literary works out of the blue. Rather, they contribute to discussions and debates about the meaning and significance of literary works, some which may continue for years and even centuries” (185).…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “To emphasize the work seems to involve severing it from those who actually read it,…” (23). If all the focus would be on just the text of the literature, then it’s easy to say we are doing nothing more than ignoring the context and reducing the analytical explanations of literature; making them into a set of rhetorical devices. Brooks, throughout his essay, explained how he was attacked multiple times for his use of New Criticism but he does commiserate those who would “recommend brighter, more amateur and more human criticism” (25). Much like with poetry, ignoring the context means we would be ignoring the emotional effects it would bring towards the readers. With these disadvantages, there would be limitations with the theory.…

    • 122 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There are seven major schools of literary criticism: gender, social/historical, biographical, psychological, mythological, new criticism, and reader based criticism ("Schools of Literary Criticism." A-41 - A-49). Each school allows for us to “read” the “text” (Old Spice Commercial) through diverse theoretical “lenses”. The question is how can these diverse “lenses” allow for us to focus in on one specific aspect of a work at a time?…

    • 1228 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    An Essay on a White Heron

    • 1759 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Guerin, Wilfred L., et, al. A Handbook of Critical Approaches to Literature. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, 2004. 5…

    • 1759 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Utopia is a world that is completely controlled by the government. The government controls every aspect of life in a utopia, and therefore everyone is always happy. In the novel "Brave New World" by Aldous Huxley the setting is a utopia. In this world people are constantly happy, babies are cloned, and, 'everyone belongs to everyone else.' The criticism which I chose was written by Margaret Cheney Dawson, on February 7th, 1932. The argument that Margaret makes is that Brave New World is a, "lugubrious and heavy-handed piece of propaganda." The critic is saying that through the book Brave New World, Aldous Huxley is promoting, and trying to sell a utopian government. I agree with this statement because…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Bibliography: Bennett, A. and Royle, N. An Introduction to Literature, Criticism and Theory (4th Ed.) (Harlow: Pearson, 2009)…

    • 1386 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Of Mice and Men

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Because the writing is a reflection of the reality of the time in which it was written, Marxist critics examine the literary work to see if it either…

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Paul Laurence Dunbar

    • 1604 Words
    • 7 Pages

    basic charge of this criticism can be stated in the words of a recent critic,…

    • 1604 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reading and writing is essential to our lives; we read and write every day in at least one way, shape, or form. Just about any educated person can read and write, but reading and writing on a scholarly or literary level demands a higher level of knowledge and understanding. There are a wide variety of aspects of literature to take into account when writing literature. Some aspects are familiar to most people: theme, setting, and characterization, among others. Meanwhile, there are certain aspects of literature that require a higher level of understanding such as style, tone, atmosphere, and figurative language. Every writer has a different method of writing, but for the most part, writers use a general structure when composing a new piece of literature. Each type of literary piece (narratives, poems, essays, speeches) has a different structure due to different reasons - each category of literature has one or more ways to shape and form the writing, but it depends on the overall purpose and type of publication. Critically thinking about literary writing is less tricky than it sounds. Critical thinking merely requires deep thought and examination. Challenging assumptions and observing different perspectives is the most important part of literary critical thinking.…

    • 775 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stanley Fish Argument

    • 1783 Words
    • 8 Pages

    This means that Brooks is concerned is concerned with formalism. Critics such as Brooks are only concerned with the text itself; they take the content of the text and think of it as form. Indeed, Brooks’ aforementioned article is titled “The Formalist Critics”. In this article, he discusses the importance of removing the author from the text, so that the text can be the primary focus of the criticism. Already, Brooks is paving the way for the importance of the individual reader to be recognized.…

    • 1783 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Metafictional Paradox

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Linda Hutcheon, Narcissistic Narratiue: The Metafictional Paradox. Methuen, London, 1984. 162 pp. Metafiction is now recognized as the designation of a kind of fiction - beginning to proliferate in the 1960s - that turns its attention on its own narrative andlor linguistic identity. Too often, critics have one-sidedly labeled it as an example of the anti-novel, a reaction against the teleological realistic tradition. Its self-reflectiveness has also been denigrated as a sign of exhaustion for the novel genre: no new fields seem left to develop and therefore it has turned inward upon itself. Some critics would argue that in metafiction the life-art connection has been severed or even denied, that the narcissism is a nihilistic exposure of previous illusions about a correlation between literary language and reality. Patricia Waugh's and Linda Hutcheon's books represent two recent contributions towards a revaluation of metafictional self-consciousness. Both suggest that there is no basic contradiction betwen auto-representational art and life. Fiction is not an aberration, for reality itself is a "book" circumscribed by culture and ideological concepts. In light of the theories of Derrida and associate poststructuralists, the mind is as much a product of language as a producer of language. Composing a novel becomes little different from construing one's 'reality7. Choosing this point of departure, Patricia Waugh points out the valuable prospects which metafiction opens up. Through parody and inversion of conventional patterns, the novel resists interpretative closure and displays its condition of artifice. It turns the focus on the very processes by which cultural codes of perception induce semblances of reality. In this way, it most fundamentally explores the entangled relationship between life and fiction. If it is true that our knowledge of the…

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Deconstruction Essay

    • 1212 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Lynn, Steven. Texts and Contexts Writing About Literature with Critical Theory (6th Edition). New York: Longman, 2011 103-136…

    • 1212 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Literary Perspectives

    • 1379 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Formalist critics are primarily concerned with the language, structure, and tone of a work, otherwise known, as it’s “formal elements”. Formalists gravitate towards “intrinsic” matters in a piece of literature, in simpler terms, diction, irony, paradox, metaphor, and symbol. In a similar fashion, they emphasize larger elements, for instance, plot, characterization, and narrative technique, in order to derive meaning from a literary work. The work must stand by itself, and any information that goes beyond the text, for example, biography, history, politics, and economics is considered “extrinsic” by formalists, and therefore far less important than what happens within the confines of the text itself. Poetry, in particular, as well as drama and fiction lend themselves well as genres to the “close reading” involved in the formalist technique. Formalists might approach Kate Chopin’s “ The Story of an Hour”(15) by analyzing the ironic ending of the story. Mrs. Mallard suddenly dies of a heart attack, not because her husband has died in a horrific train crash but because she has learned that he is very much alive. The disparate nature between what is expected to transpire and what actually happens creates a complex irony which formalists value immensely over simple surprise tactics.…

    • 1379 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Feminism and Marxism

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages

    proletariat. Bourgeoisie are those who own a natural resource, like farm or have an economic…

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Community Survey

    • 5274 Words
    • 22 Pages

    WOLFGANG ISER "THE READING PROCESS: A PHENOMENOLOGICAL APPROACH" (1972) Iser, Wolfgang. "The Reading Process: a Phenomenological Approach." The Implied Reader. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1974. 274-294. I Here, Iser asserts that the “phenomenological theory of art of art lays full stress on the idea that, in considering a literary work, one must take into account not only the actual text but also, and in equal measure, the actions involved in responding to that text” (274). Alluding to the work of the Polish phenomenologist Roman Ingarden, Iser argues that the text offers various "schematised views" (275) or "perspectives" (275) that the reader ‘concretises’ in the process of reading: the reader "sets the work in motion" (275). For this reason, the “literary work has two poles, which we might call the artistic and the aesthetic” (274), the former referring to “text created by the author” (274), the latter to the “realisation accomplished by the reader” (274). The work “cannot be completely identical with the text, or with the realisation of the text, but in fact must lie halfway between the two” (274). The "text only takes on life when it is realised” (274). This “realization” (274) is by no means “independent of the individual disposition of the reader” (274) which “in turn is acted on by the different patterns of the text" (275). The "convergence of text and reader brings the literary work into existence" (275), a convergence that “can never be pinpointed, but must always remain virtual” (275) and impossible to identify either with the “reality of the text or with the individual disposition of the reader” (275). It is the "virtuality" (275) of the literary work (he calls the work later a "gestalt" [280]) which renders it “dynamic” (275) which is the “precondition of the effects that the work calls forth” (275): as the reader uses the various perspectives offered him by the text in order to relate the patterns and…

    • 5274 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Powerful Essays