Preview

Robert Cecil

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
365 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Robert Cecil
Who is he?
Robert Cecil, Earl of Salisbury, was a major political figure in the reigns of Elizabeth I and I. He was the second son of Lord Burghley who was Chief Minister to Elizabeth I. Cecil was schooled at home where he learned about politics and statesmanship.

What was his relationship with the monarch like?
Cecil was an intellectual and he preferred a cautious approach in politics. He frequently demonstrated self-control and patience - qualities that stood him in good stead when dealing with Elizabeth.

He had to work harder as James was by any standards a lazy monarch and seemingly left whatever needed to be done to Cecil.

He proved as loyal and hard-working for James as he had been for Elizabeth.

What was his position?
In the last years of Elizabeth's reign, Cecil was Secretary and he was also the government's chief spokesman and manager in the House of Commons. On the death of his father in 1598, Cecil became Chief Minister after a contest with the Earl of Essex. In the last five years of Elizabeth's reign, Cecil took on a vast amount of work by himself, ranging from the war in Ireland, financial matters and the succession question.

On Elizabeth's death in 1603, Cecil became the Chief Minister for James I. That there was a seamless handover between Tudors and Stuarts is down to the work done by Cecil.

In 1608 Cecil became Lord Treasurer but although he was an efficient administrator he was unable to deal with mounting royal debts. Robert Cecil died of stomach cancer in 1612.

What were his achievements or failures?
Robert Cecil played an interesting part in the Gunpowder Plot of 1605. He was a trusted servant of James I, who was all but a prime minister in Stuart England. There are historians who believe that sufficient evidence exists to show that Cecil orchestrated the whole plot - unknown to the plotters - to convince James I that Catholics were not to be trusted and that they should once and for all be thrown out of the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Queen Elizabeth I was loved by most of her English subjects, which is why they used her for the model of the ideal Renaissance woman and leader. Her intellect was much the same, if not better, than all of the princes of her time (Doc 1) She could speak Latin, French, and Italian and understand Greek. She loved reading about history and even translated a book. She was both feared and loved, and made decisions based on what was best for her country. Queen Elizabeth I was one of the few examples of Renaissance women being praised for their intellect and…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One factor Elizabeth had to face, which was seen as a huge disadvantage, was her gender. This was because the society was very patriarchal, male dominated, meaning that she was seen as week and less capable of being a good leader. This was a problem for Elizabeth as she had to do more to prove that she could be a good leader. This leads onto the fact that her sister Mary wasn’t a good leader so therefore there were low expectations of Elizabeth, This also meant Elizabeth had a lot to prove in order to be a good leader. Although this was a problem for Elizabeth, there were also positive factors to her gender. One of these was that Elizabeth was very good at using her flirtatious charm to get what she wanted. Another reason Elizabeth’s gender wasn’t too much of a problem was that she asserted her royal authority; it was her divine right to become the queen as god had chosen her.…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Richard

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Edward IV, king of England, died suddenly and prematurely at Windsor castle – perhaps from a stroke, or peritonitis or even a chill caught while on a fishing trip – in April 1483 aged only 40 years. He had enjoyed a relatively successful reign, by the standards of the day, restoring peace after the disordered period of Lancastrian rule and providing his subjects with some much needed stability. Edward IV had been a strong king after 1471, able to control the rival noble factions, but his death opened up a destructive, disastrous Yorkist family feud. The throne should have passed smoothly to his son; Edward V. This however didn’t happen due to his brother, Richard duke of Gloucester wanting the power; Edward changed his will on his death bed so his wishes weren’t clear; his marriage to Elizabeth Woodville. On his death a bitter family feud was started.…

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Queen Elizabeth Dbq

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Queen Elizabeth I of England, who ruled for 45 years from 1558-1603, had an uneasy reign. Since she was a female monarch and not male, which was rare in England, people believed that she wouldn’t be a competent monarch. The people who were not favorable for female monarchs or even females in general, believed very strongly abut the issue. John Knox, a Scottish religious reformer, declared in First Blast of the Trumpet Against the Monstrous Regiment of Women, that a women ruler is “against all nature” (D1). However, there are some who are favorable to Queen Elizabeth’s rule as a female. Marcus Gheeraerts, an English court painter, depicts Queen Elizabeth as a person who is rich and in control by dressing her in extravagant clothes and putting the world underneath her (D8). During Queen Elizabeth’s reign, there were those who were not favorable to her rule and those who were, but apart from what others said, she herself thought that she was a competent ruler.…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    After Edward IV died in 1483, a dispute began between to major factions – the Woodvilles and Richard of Gloucester. The Woodvilles were the family of Elizabeth Woodville, Edward’s wife, with whom he shared many children. Edward V, the heir to the throne, was the son of Elizabeth Woodville, and so this put them in a good position. However, Richard of Gloucester was Edward’s brother and had shown himself to be a very useful and successful man to Edward during his reign. They both had their various strengths and weaknesses, and they both wanted the same thing. Control of England.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    William Cecil’s influence touched on just about all aspects of policy that occurred during Elizabeth’s long reign. In the Royal Court he brought order and stability. Cecil was also highly influential in foreign policy. He saw France and Spain as threats to. It has also been argued that Cecil was not just the provider of advice and executor of the Queens wishes but also that he could have been the power behind the throne. Plenty of evidence has come to light that suggests that the Secretary regularly attempted to manipulate Elizabeth however it would be inaccurate to assume that all of Cecil’s personal agendas were fruitful, Elizabeth could make her own mind up and often did so. Although Cecil was a prominent figure during this time, Elizabeth was still the person who ruled the country and had her own ideas on how to run the country. Elizabeth was firmly in control of major policies and on many occasions obstinately ignored the Councils advice. The Council conscientiously carried out the Queens wishes even when it had advised otherwise. There is general agreement that, until its decline in the 1590s central government under Elizabeth was successful and that the Queen provided firm direction. According to Neale Parliament was another aspect that had influence over decision making in Elizabeth government He argues that the power of the House of Commons increased throughout Elizabeth’s reign. The number of conflicts Elizabeth had with individual MPs and the problems which the Stuarts experienced with Parliament are evidence for this. These developments were brought by the “Puritan Choir “who deliberately planned confrontations to force the issue of parliamentary privilege versus the royal prerogative. It is therefore necessary to investigate not only to what extent Cecil was involved in the decision making process but also the influence of the Parliament on Elizabeth and ultimately the decisions that were taken through this time of how many were Elizabeth’s own ideas.…

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    HOW FAR DO YOU AGREE THAT PARLIAMENT MOSTLY COOPERATED WITH ELIZABETH I? (Explain your answer.)…

    • 2650 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Elizabeth I Dbq

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Considering the fact that a female successor to the throne of England was ascending, there was a tremendous amount of political influence on her reign. The Act of Supremacy (Doc. 3), declared by King Henry VII, assured that Elizabeth would be the rightful heir to the throne of England; this parliamentary act stated that Elizabeth is the most superior being of the realm of her kingdom. Because Henry VIII wanted to break away from the papacy to elevate his status as head of the church and state, the motive for this parliamentary act was to increase the monarchy’s status and establish an independent kingdom of England. Moreover, John Aylmer (Doc. 2) suggests that since Elizabeth does not rule alone, but with the Parliament, there should be no reason to object her rule. Since Aylmer has connections with Elizabeth’s court and a significant influence on the population of the kingdom, he might have written this exert in his pamphlet to soothe the opinions of anti-feminists who blatantly attacked Elizabeth’s reign. Furthermore, Marcus Gheeraerts the Younger (Doc. 8) paints Elizabeth standing on a globe; this shows that her court painter was attempting to win her favor by depicting that Elizabeth had the power in her hands. Similarly, William Clowes (Doc. 10) expresses his devotion to her Majesty. Being that he is her personal surgeon, he might also want to win her favor by praising the queen and gain influence of his own.…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Elizabeth had inherited the throne of England in 1558 from a Catholic queen Mary who had attempted to re-convert England back to Catholicism and to allow the country to take part in the Catholic reformation of Europe. The accession of Elizabeth was met with anxiety and tension as to discover what she was to do in response to religion and how the Catholic powers of Europe as well as the Catholics within England at the time would treat any changes. The immediate rise to power was met with little hostility as Elizabeth had made very cautious changes to start with as she thought it wise not to provoke hostility from abroad considering the position of England at the time as a small, weak protestant nation. The start of Elizabeth’s reign was fairly peaceful however tensions rose and a Catholic threat seemed more imminent as her reign drew to the end.…

    • 2682 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ap Euro Dbq Elizabeth I

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Elizabeth I was the Queen of England who ruled from 1558-1603. Elizabeth’s reign achieved great success including great achievements in the arts and an increase in literacy. Overall Elizabeth’s rule established political stability, although Elizabeth battled opposing views, during that time, from people who saw a women unfit to rule and superior to men. Even through these negative views Elizabeth responded by applying strong leadership skills. However, Elizabeth neglected the challenges she faced as an important religious leader.…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Trade Vs Manorialism

    • 2461 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Each of the english monarchs had grown more and more power. William tightened the iron fist by creating feudalism 2.0, the domesday book, and built plenty of castles. Henry I followed suit, establishing the exchequer and creating traveling judges to try courts, then Henry II, started a 12 man jury and allowed nobles to buy their way out of becoming a knight. So when Henry II died and left his son, John, to the throne, it seemed natural that the king's power would continue to grow...well not exactly this time (sorry King John). Nobody really liked King John. He was always trying to increase taxes, including illegal church taxes and noble's taxes, and inevitably lost most of England's french land ( AU REVOIR JOHNNY). Usually, the…

    • 2461 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Did the Civil War Begin?

    • 2630 Words
    • 11 Pages

    On 22 August 1642, King Charles I raised his battle standard and declared a civil war against his enemies in Parliament.…

    • 2630 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The relationship and status of the monarchy in parliament’s eyes had already been in a state of decline even before Charles’ reign. His predecessor had been known as the ‘wisest fool in Christendom’ and there was a lot of resentment towards the former king, James, not only because of the number of times he dissolved parliament but also from his abuse of power and alienation of them through royal prerogatives, which were justified by his own ‘divine right of kings’ belief. It could be argued that Charles was pulled into an uphill battle from the start and was not to blame for the damaged relationship between the commons and himself, however, during Charles’ reign, he made no attempt to reconcile relations even repeating the ideals of his father through the ‘divine right of kings’ and also through the arrogance of his attitude and subsequent dissolution of parliament on many occasions.…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Richard was not aware of the fact that Buckingham was not 100% loyal, and because of this Richard made the mistake of setting Buckingham in charge of stopping the rebellions in the south, and because…

    • 644 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A child born in the turn of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, at the end of the year 1600, was to inherit this hitherto unquestioned office, and apparently to inherit it undiminished in reputation or effect. He was to come to the kingship of his fathers in true descent of the Blood Royal, and , destined as it would seem, to administer as those before him had administered and to hand on this same power and majesty to his posterity. Yet in the lifetime of that child- and it was not a long one, monarchy in England crumbled, or rather was destroyed. He himself acted that tragedy and took the tragic part therein. First he was thwarted by his more powerful subjects through his early years, from the day when as a young man of twenty-five he came to his own when he had not long passed his fortieth year. They gradually destroyed his national forces, they triumphed over him, they belittle him by one humiliation after another, and at last, before he had reached his fiftieth year, they put him to death. With him died the English monarchy- he was the last ruling King of England, the last who goverened as Kings had goverened for untold years. His virtues destroyed the Crown of England and the power thereof.…

    • 1186 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays