Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Rob Heaney dbq 11 3

Good Essays
890 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Rob Heaney dbq 11 3
Robert Heaney

Mr.Russo

APUSH

11/3/14

DBQ Assignment
During the period starting in 1820 and ending in 1860, when the United States was divided by sectionalism. During this time, the United States was faced with many issues that could only be formed through creating a compromise that was fair for all parties involved. The nation found it impossible to compromise due to differences in opinion, political views, political parties and other factors.

One of the first main issues that required compromise to create a reasonable solution was the enactment of tariffs on the south. The main export of the south was cotton. Cotton was what supplied the south with almost all of its money. In about 1828 to 1833 the first major conflict between the north and south was created during the Tariff or Nullification Crisis. In 1828, the North enacted a tariff on the south that severely affected their cotton trade. The tax rates were as high as forty five to fifty percent. The tariffs were nicknamed the "Tariffs of Abominations" because the south was so disgusted at the high rates it was facing. The south spoke out against these high rates and the north lowered the tariff rates to thirty three percent. Despite lowering the tariff, South Carolina decided that they were not going to follow the tariff, and not pay it. The reasoning the state had was that they thought they should not have to follow any sort of law or tax that was not beneficial to themselves. South Carolina nullified the tariff and didn't pay them. The north was outraged at this act. The north thought that the if South Carolina was able to repeal the tariff and ignore it, who would be able to stop them from ignoring laws regarding slavery? The north and the federal government were offended and angry. An example of their displeasure is shown in Henry Clay's speech to the Senate when he states "I merely throw out these sentiments for the purpose of showing you that South Carolina having declared her purpose...she can defeat the execution of certain laws of the United States, I for one, will express my opinion that I believe it is utterly impractical...that South Carolina...become a separate state" (Document A). Instead of working to create a compromise, the North and South began an argument, and the tariff was only eventually reduced to twenty percent, which was Still extremely high.

Another factor that brought north and south apart was that the south still used slavery. In the north, slavery was viewed as backwards and wrong while in the south it was considered necessary and they believed they were doing a service for the slaves. The north and south created different moral views and they were becoming more and more different from each other. Abolitionist parties were being created in the north, and the South was offended by this. Abolition was direct attack on the south's way of life. The Abolitionists show that they dislike the southern slavery with their declaration at the American Anti-Slavery Society " We believe and affirm that every American citizen who retains a Human being in involuntary bondage as his property is a MAN STEALER. The slaves ought to instantly to be set free...no compensation given to planters..." (Document B). The south is upset and becomes defensive after these attacks making compromise more and more impossible after the two sides repeatedly insult each other. The north and south both think that they are superior to one another and than the other is uncivilized or brutish. An example of this hostility is shown in things like newspapers or books where the artists or writers would display the uncivilized action of their rivals (Document E). The arguing and insulting made compromise impossible because each wanted to gain an edge on their opponents.

One last issue that made compromise virtually impossible was the differences in political parties in the South and in the north. In the north, there was only one political party that was voted for, or the republican party. In the the south, they voted democratic but there were two different parties. The main point is that the north was strictly republican and the south was strictly democratic. The two regions had almost opposite political views and were both very passionate about them and would not make any sort of compromise with the opposite political party. The difference in voting is shown in (Document H) a voting map that depicted the voting results in the north and the south. The republicans and democrats had opposite views. The republicans had different Morals than the south who believed that the democrats in the south were wrong. Lincoln in his speech in Illinois shows his input in how wrong it is that it has become a battle of morals "...In politics, in religion, in literature, in morals, In all manifold relations in life? Is this the work of politicians?" (Document G)

Compromise was made virtually impossible between the north and south. Their immensely different opinions, morals and ways of life made Compromise very hard to achieve. If the two sides were more cooperative and they were more understanding, comprising would have been more possible and they would have had the ability to avoid conflict. If compromise was reached, our nation would be very different than the one we know today.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Andrew Jackson was a war hero turned president, but his battles did not end with his election. One type of problem Jackson faced was economic. South Carolinian planters saw that the protective tariff, passed by Congress in 1824, as oppressive since most of the revenue made from it was invested in the northeast’s manufacturing industry. They were more infuriated when the tariff was raised in the summer of 1828 (Brinkley 207). The South Carolinians and Vice President John C. Calhoun saw the taxes as “blatantly unconstitutional, exceeding Congress’s powers to raise necessary revenues and oppressing one section of the country while enriching others” (Wilentz 63). A nullification document written by Calhoun known as the South Carolina Exposition and Protest was passed by the state legislature in 1832 as a response. This text announced that any state could declare its original sovereignty and disregard federal laws that are found offensive in their borders. In retaliation, Jackson sent federal troops to South Carolina to enforce the law, but before any violence could ensure the state backed down (Brinkley 207). This created a strong rift between the Jackson and his vice president that turned in to a bitter rivalry between the two. Jackson’s…

    • 1818 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The issue of slavery became an even greater concern when the Louisiana Purchase territories were to enter the Union as states. The question was, would new territories enter the Union as slave or free states? The South wanted a balance of power. They knew that if the North were to have more free states, then slavery in the south could be facing extinction through congress. In an attempt to conciliate with the South, the North agreed upon the Missouri Compromise of 1820. Through this, slavery was banned above the 36 degrees 30 minute line and Missouri entered as a slave state, Maine a free state. For a while, it retained the balance of power. However, tempers in the south rose again later in the 1820s over high tariffs. The tariffs benefitted the north but threatened southern cotton exports. In 1828, the tariff was around 50%. President Jackson modified it to around 33% in 1832 only to have South Carolina nullify it in the state. It raised the question of whether or not the federal government could legally impose protective tariffs and whether it was constitutional for a state to nullify a federal law. "South…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The compromise Tariff of 1833 ended the dispute over the Tariff of 1832 between the South and the White House. The compromise was supported by South Carolina but not much by the other states of the South.…

    • 1288 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Apush Dbq Analysis

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This of course does not bode well with the cotton farmers and they declare nullification, as stated in the Constitution as the right of a State. The Nullification was withdrawn when Congress altered the tariff to a more reasonable amount. However, the national government soon switched to dual federalism after the tariff conflict was resolved, which would limit the rights of states against the Federal Government. Vice President Calhoun, being from South Carolina, helped the farmers by creating an act that gave states the right to declare nullification of a law they disagreed with. The Southern farmers still believed that the tax was too pricey, and eventually President Jackson took federal troops to South Carolina and destroyed the nullification once and for all.…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Northerners opposed slavery, whereas the agriculture dependent Southerners supported it. It was on this issue that the most acerbic debates took place. For the unity and efficiency of the whole country, both sides gave in and made the most famous of the compromises, the Three-Fifth Clause, which won unanimous approval. Not wanting to loose the valuable revenues from the South, the Northerners compromised again in the Constitution by prohibiting Congress from outlawing the slave trade for at least twenty years in order to appeal to the masses. Was this necessarily the right and just decision? No. But it undeniably guaranteed the South as a part of the…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    But then the tariff did pass after all. Vice President John C. Calhoun of South Carolina anonymously wrote an “Exposition and Protest” of the Tariff of 1828, which became known as the “Tariff of Abominations.” When a tariff bill passed again in 1832, because it was still too high to suit the needs of Southern agricultural interests, the State of South Carolina decided to nullify the tariff. They took their action very deliberately, calling a special convention and passing an “Ordinance of Nullification” that claimed not only that the tariff was not enforceable in South Carolina, but that any attempt to enforce it by state or federal officials would not be permitted within South…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The relations between the North and South had disagreements over taxes. The North raised the taxes appointed by Congress on imported goods to support their industrial development. On the contrary, in the South, being an agricultural economy had to buy machinery from the foreign and ending paying for those high taxes. On the 1850s, Congress increased the import tax from 15 to 37 percent. The South threatened the northern mandataries; consequently, the north was offended. Besides, Chicago Daily Times published that if the South withdraws from the north, the economy could be affected as income cutting in half (Stanley, 2011). The southerners were unhappy in how the North was limiting their earnings.…

    • 112 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq 1987

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages

    By the 1850’s the Constitution, originally framed as an instrument of national unity, had become a source of sectional discord and tension and ultimately contributed to the failure of the union it has created. This was shown by interpretations of the constitution and other documents when the constitution was assorted together.…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The North introduced high tariffs in order to exploit the productions of slavery in the South. If they couldn’t prevent it, why not benefit from it? And who was to know, maybe some extra money would be beneficial in the future because of the constant political struggles. The number one cash crop was cotton, also known as “King Cotton.” The South was outraged about the tariffs.…

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    During the 1790s, Americans became divided over how much power should be held by the federal government. This time period had a huge impact on the United States as the country had begun to struggle to gain stability. The actions of the nation's leaders, including George Washington, Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson assisted in the formation of different opinions and a split within the population. Around the time of the 1790s, the nation was split between parties, Federalist and the Jeffersonian Republicans, whose political systems were highly impacted by many domestic and foreign affairs that provoked a turning point in the nation.…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    For the most part South Carolina was right. Congress did not have the power or right, but the tariffs in question weren’t unreasonable. In response to that threat Andrew Jackson sent the a portion of the U.S. navy to enforce the tariffs. At this point South Carolina knew it could go to war with the U.S., so a compromise was created. This compromise would appease both sides, but the more important part is that now the absolute power of federal government is more evident.…

    • 1463 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Emancipation Dbq

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Conflict erupted due to the point of high tension between the continuous dissension over the critical issue. Lincoln supported emancipation as a war measure for the beginning of the war in order to gather support for the Union. Lincoln declared that he will side with border states who abolish slavery. He hoped that support from these critical states would play a decisive role in the war. Emancipation was still seen as a war measure because there was significant opposition from the conservative supporters. However, Lincoln explains to a religious group that emancipation would actually restore legitimacy for the Union in Europe, as the consensus there was set on an antislavery sentiment. This would prevent European dependence on textiles and undermine King Cotton diplomacy. In order to set a moral framework, Jefferson Davis explains that emancipation would hurt slaves and the basis of his argument was that slavery was a justifiable evil. Lincoln still doesn’t fully oppose Davis by taking the position of abolitionism. Instead, he viewed emancipation only as a war measure and doesn’t extend full rights. Davis views it as an immoral act as it would create revolts and a race war in the South. The issue with compromise positions was that they were mostly ineffective in containing slavery in the South. Instead, they created dissent throughout the congress, making the critical issue worse. A motive…

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They depended greatly on the North for their industries and factories, because they had very few. They also opposed federal spending on internal improvements and they wanted no tariffs. Even despite having a somewhat weak economy, the South wanted to gain their independence to become their own country, and to have their own way of life, which included slavery as legal. When Abraham Lincoln was elected in 1860, the South thought that they would have no voice in the government, considering that Abraham Lincoln was against slavery. In hopes of being their own country, the South had no intention of fighting a war. However, before the war started, the South was unwilling to compromise. They thought that slavery should be allowed in all of the territories. They disagreed to the Missouri Compromise and to parts of the Compromise of 1850. Many felt that these compromises were unfair and biased. The South felt that their way of life and views on slavery were right and just. They turned to what they thought was their only choice: seceding from the Union. This enrage the North, which was one of the main causes of the Civil War.…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Today, the United States of America is known for its strong structured government and this ideology of freedom among its people. However, the reality was that our journey to gain this freedom and structure was a rocky road that caused a division among the American people. A couple of issues that caused a division among American society were the purchase of the Louisiana Territory and the expansion of slavery into new territories. Slavery has always been a controversial topic, and people had used their opinions to argue for their support or rejection of expansion of slavery into new territories.…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Confederate economy was for the most part agrarian while the Union followed along the lines of an industrialized economy. These different economies fostered different lifestyles that led to different political and social views. These situations further enhanced the tension between the Union and the Confederates. Along with the other issues the issue of slavery and the rights of the states was the primary cause of the Civil War. Slavery was deeply encouraged into Confederate society and tied to the agrarian economy. The issue of whether or not states had the right to choose if they wanted to have slaves or not was debated by Congress. The Compromise of 1850 helped in adding the tension between the states. It first made California part of the United States. Then it gave the new territories but not the states, the right to decide whether or not they should have slaves. The Compromise of 1850 made many of the Union states, who wanted to have greater political control,…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays