Preview

Right to Council Unit 7

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1203 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Right to Council Unit 7
Kaplan University
LS305 Constitutional Law
Unit 7 Assignment
Judge Kent
May 7, 2012

The roots for the right to council go back quite a ways. This right to counsel for the defendant pertains to those who cannot afford to pay fees for a private lawyer. Let’s take a trip back down memory lane as these rights can be found more than a century ago. The Webb v. Baird decision in 1853, however, was the exception rather than the rule in the states. In Webb v. Baird, the Indiana Supreme Court recognized a right to an attorney at public expense for an indigent person accused of crime, grounded in "the principles of a civilized society," not in constitutional or statutory law (Ind. 1853).
Well down the road, most states relied only on the pro bono or volunteer efforts of lawyers to provide defense for poor people accused of sometimes the most serious crimes. While some private programs for legal aide were actively providing counsel to needy people, such services did not exist outside of the larger cities. "It is not to be thought of in a civilized community for a moment that any citizen put in jeopardy of life or liberty should be debarred of counsel because he is too poor to employ such aid," the Indiana court wrote. "No court could be expected to respect itself to sit and hear such a trial. The defense of the poor in such cases is a duty which will at once be conceded as essential to the accused, to the court and to the public" (Ind. 1853).
The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution states: "In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right . . . to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence" ("The 6th amendment,"). There are seven protections provided from the Sixth Amendment. They are the right to a speedy trial, the right to a public trial, the right to be judged by an impartial jury, the right to be notified of the nature and circumstances of the alleged crime, the right to confront witnesses who will testify against the accused,



References: Webb v. Baird, 6 Ind. 13 (Ind. 1853) The 6th amendment. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.revolutionary-war-and-beyond.com/6th-amendment.html Office of the federal defender for the eastern district of california. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.cae-fpd.org/History.htm Powell v. State of ala., 287 U.S. 45 (1932) Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963) Argersinger v. Hamlin, 407 U.S. 25 (1972)

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Commentators and courts have noted that because certain equitable defenses were statutorily required to be tried by jury prior to the adoption of the 1894 Constitution, the deprivation of a jury trial for all equitable defenses is arguably unconstitutional. Under CPLR section 4101, when a plaintiff brings a legal action, the defendant’s equitable counterclaims should not be submitted to a jury. Under CPLR section 4102(c), when a plaintiff brings an action sounding in equity, the defendant’s legal counterclaims should be tried by a jury if so demanded. The counterclaims pled by a defendant enjoy the same careful analysis as the claims contained in the plaintiff’s complaint.…

    • 2857 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alabama, and overruled Betts v. Brady, which allowed selective application of the Sixth Amendment right to counsel to the states, itself previously binding only in federal cases. Instead, the court held that the right to the assistance of counsel was a fundamental right, essential for a fair trial, thereby emphasizing the procedural safeguards which were needed for due process of law. In this sense, the court ruled specifically that no one, regardless of wealth, education or class, should be charged with a crime and then be forced to face his accusers in court without the guidance of counsel. All of the other justices concurred in the judgment.…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Supreme Court decided that having counsel is necessary to receive a fair trial. “Gideon transformed criminal prosecutions and generated significant funding for indigent defense nationally.” (273; WEB) Such funding provides all indigents with a defense attorney at the State level regardless of any special circumstances or the severity of the crime. Gideon’s case changed the way the 6th and 14th Amendments were interpreted thus the Federal powers forced the States to recognize this need for all defendants regardless of their incomes to receive a fair trial by way of free legal…

    • 947 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The right to a fair trial. Where does it come from? The 6th Amendment. Which category of defendants were the first to be given this right when accused of a crime by a state? Anyone charged with a capital offense (must be provided an attorney) Which category came next? Anyone charged with a felony (must be provided an attorney) Which criminal defendants still do not have this right? If he or she is not sentenced to actual imprisonment and could not have been sentenced for more than one year.…

    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    In 1963, the Supreme Court ruled in Gideon v. Wainwright that the Sixth Amendment guarantees every defendant, regardless of socioeconomic status, the right to an attorney and equal protection under the court of law. This means that an indigent defendant that cannot afford to hire a private attorney may have a public defender appointed to him or her. However, fifty years later, the promises of Gideon v. Wainwright may remain unfulfilled. Public defenders may not be able to provide the same treatment to their clients as a private attorney, resulting in harsher sentences being placed on indigent defendants. This is clearly not the equal treatment that Gideon sought, and it is rather evident that the public defender system is very flawed.…

    • 2715 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gideon Vs Wainwright Case

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Gideon’s VS. Wainwright is a case that happened on June 3, 1961 about a young man named Clarence Earl Gideon. The report says that between midnight and eight A.M there was a burglary that happened at the bay harbor pool room in Panama City, Florida. There was word that a lot of different things got broken that night and money…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    CJ 305

    • 1602 Words
    • 9 Pages

    -Ordered states to provide lawyers for those unable to afford them in criminal proceedings which could jail or imprison the defendant; warren court’s judicial activism in criminal rights.…

    • 1602 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Amendment Six: Case Study

    • 1701 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The first clause of Amendment Six is the speedy trial clause. There are several reasons that this clause is positive to the accused in a case on trial. Primarily the right to a speedy trial can prevent undue and oppression, and minimize the anxiety and concern that accompanies public accusation. A speedy trial can limit the possibility that long delay will impair the ability of an accused to defend himself. Furthermore, delaying a trial is can tamper with the evidence and witnesses because over time evidence can lose value and witnesses could forget what happened at the the crime scene or even die before the trial takes place. The right of a speedy trial can also be in opposition to the interests of the accused because it can cause the accused…

    • 1701 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Alabama are a clear statement of the importance of the defendant’s right to counsel in a criminal proceeding. The right to counsel has been the source of much controversy within the U.S. law over the past decades. However, in the light of the words of Justice Sutherland, the failure of the trial court to appoint counsel was found a denial of due process. The Powell case holding declared that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment required that state courts give defendants an opportunity to obtain counsel for defendants in all capital cases who are not able to afford one and an attorney free of charge in noncapital…

    • 1666 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Speedy Trial Analysis

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages

    These source texts address the enduring issue concerning states rights being in conflict with federal power by relating Flordia's unwillingness to provide this case's defendant with an attorney and the federal government's power to force Flordia to abide by the 6th Amendment. These issues clearly reflect how prescient our founding fathers were in generating a set of founding principles enabling posterity to grapple with new and evolving situation that could not have been foreseen in the context of the times when our founding documents were written. Luckily, the 6th Amendment is closely aligned with this defendant's right to legal council, providing a useful direction in resolving the tension between the old and new issues. The fact that the state of Flordia should provide Mr. Gideon with a lawer is obvious because the 6th Amendment guarantees a person the right to consult a lawyer in his or her defense and if a lawyer is not appointed, such an act clearly violates the Constitution. Accordingly, these reasons and opposing viewpoints will be discussed next.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Powell v AL

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages

    DISSCUSSION: Justice Sutherland delivered the opinion of the court. They said “a defendant should be afforded a fair opportunity to secure counsel of his own choice.” The court also determined that the defendants were not “defendants were not accorded the right of counsel in any substantial sense”. When the court appointed the members of the bar from the area he knowingly denied the defendants their right to counsel. Paired with the poor indefinite charge to get the defendants counsel with their…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Right To Lasnik Case

    • 1436 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Our justice system is one of the things I admire most about american government. The sixth amendment ensures American citizens in all criminal prosecutions the right to a speedy and public trial, the right to trial by jury, and the right to legal counsel. Without the sixth amendment our justice system would not be very just because those accused of a crime would not have sufficient legal protection. this would impact my life and the lives of all Americans.…

    • 1436 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Paramount to any criminal justice career field is safeguarding civil liberties. Civil liberties are defined as “freedom from arbitrary interference in one’s pursuits by individuals or by government...”(Dershowtiz,2010). All careers in the criminal justice field protect these basic amendments in some way. Civil Liberties contain all promises and amendments contained within the Bill of Rights, 13th 14th and 15th amendments of the United states constitution (Dershowitz,2010).The 6th amendment which is summarized as the right to a speedy trial, as well as representation by a trial of peers is one of the amendments in the bill of rights that almost every career in criminal justice from correction officers to law enforcement officers and judges protect.…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the many ways that the poor have unequal access to justice is not being able to afford their own attorneys. Court appointed attorneys are usually very young, inexperienced, and have massive workloads. Court appointed attorneys cannot defend a client in the same manner as a lawyer that cost $200 an hour. Most court appointed attorneys don’t get to meet with their clients often, usually meeting only a few times before the trial. Because the court appointed attorneys don’t get to meet with their clients as much as a paid lawyer, the defendant doesn’t always get the best representation.…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Fourteenth Amendment

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages

    He was poor and unable to pay for his own defense. He appealed his convicted because of the court’s refusal to a court appointed attorney was in direct violation of his Fourteenth Amendment due process rights. At this time, the court was only granting the right to counsel in special circumstances. “The petitioner, in this instance, asks us, in effect, to apply a rule in the enforcement of the due process clause. He says the rule to be deduced from our former decisions is that, in every case, whatever the circumstances, one charged with crime, who is unable to obtain counsel, must be furnished counsel by the State” Betts v. Brady (1942). The holding by the Court in this case was that the Betts need not a lawyer in order to have a fair trial. Thus, the Court decided that counsel only needs to be appointed in certain trials but not all trials. This differed from Gideon v. Wainwright because in Gideon’s case the decision of Betts v. Brady was overturned. The decided that it was a violation of his due process rights. Rich and poor should both have the opportunity to counsel regardless. A defendant cannot properly defend themselves as well as a professional lawyer could, therefore, counsel needs to be granted if ask…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays