Preview

Richard Iii

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
4396 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Richard Iii
Analysis of Richard III

Members:
Natalia Molina
Melisa Ocanto
Melina Pustilnik
Vanesa Verna

Licenciatura en Lengua Inglesa

Universidad Nacional de San Martín RICHARD III

1) Richard III: hero or villain.
2) Analyze women in the play.
3) Analyze the use of dramatic irony in the play.
4) Analyze the opening soliloquy in Richard III.
5) Which is Richard 's hamartia? When does it occur?
6) Where do you find the climax of the play?
7) Where do you find the catharsis and where the anagnorisis?

1) Richard III: hero or villain.

In order to analyze if Richard III is a hero or a villain, it is necessary to first comprehend both words. On one hand, a hero or heroine, according to the Dictionary of Literary Terms is the principal male and female characters in a work of literature. In criticism the terms carry no connotations of virtuousness or honor. On the other hand, a villain is described as “the wicked character in a story and, in an important and special sense, the evil machinator or plotter in a play”. We must know that these two definitions are not restrictive of each other. We must also bear in mind Aristotle’s own interpretation of tragic hero:
• “Good or fine”: Aristotle relates this quality to moral purpose and says it is relative to class: “Even a woman may be good, and also a slave, though the woman may be said to be an inferior being, and the slave quite worthless.”
• “Fitness of character” (true to type): courage is appropriate for a warrior but not for a woman.
• “Consistency” (true to themselves): Once a character 's personality and motivations are established, these should continue throughout the play.
• “Necessary or probable”: Characters must be logically constructed according to “the law of probability or necessity” that governs the actions of the play.
• “True to life and yet more beautiful” (idealized, ennobled). In the case of this play, Richard does not fulfill the first characteristic cited above. This



Bibliography: ARISTOTLE. Poetics. DICTIONARY OF LITERARY TERMS AND LITERARY THEORY. England, Penguin, 1999. HALIO J. L. Understanding the Merchant of Venice: A Student Casebook to Issues, Sources, and Historical Documents. London, The Greenwood Press, 2000. SHAKESPEARE, W. Richard III. New York, Simon & Schuster, Inc., 1996.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    King Richard’s ability as an actor within a play explores how this type of villainy was entertaining in the era of Shakespeare. Richard’s evil is immediately established as his moral deformities are clearly embodied in his physical deformities. In justifying his premeditated meddling, he personifies war in his first soliloquy. ‘Grim visag’d war hath supported his wrinkled front’ and moved to caper ‘ nimbly in a lady’s chamber!’ Richard’s nature: ‘Deform’d, unfinished’ thus justifies his evil as he cannot participate in the war -lovemaking atmosphere. This was obviously a form of entertainment to the Shakespearean audience who had known of the war of the Roses and Richard’s deformities.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Richard 3rd Comparison

    • 1485 Words
    • 6 Pages

    2. List the people who die by Richard's orders in Act III. What does each of them realize as they die? What does this suggest about the idea of justice presented in the play?…

    • 1485 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    By analysing the parallels and differences between King Richard III and Looking For Richard, the responder is positioned to appreciate the distinctive contexts from which each text emerged. Whilst an exploration of the moral vices and corruptive consequences of the relentless pursuit of power is explored in both texts, a closer examination of the way power is represented…

    • 1076 Words
    • 35 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Shoehorn Sonata

    • 1726 Words
    • 7 Pages

    TASK: Re-read the play. Go through and highlight specific characteristics of our two protagonists – ensuring that you can provide evidence from the play (The evidence could be lines or phrases of dialogue, their actions, current or past, or their body language as described in the text.)…

    • 1726 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    King Richard III and Looking For Richard directly relate to historical and social contexts respectively, social drawing on historical’s challenge to the context in which it was written. Shakespeare’s play was crafted in a difficult time of political and religious adherence. Shakespeare’s portrayal of Richard focuses on his devilish and Machiavellian nature. Machiavelli’s The Prince teaches that an adept ruler should aim to achieve power at any cost. Richard is a Machiavel; he calls himself a devil, ‘Thus like the formal Vice, Iniquity, I moralise two meanings in one word.’…

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Richard III is an historical play written by William Shakespeare during the reign of Queen Elizabeth I, depicting the contentious rise to power of King Richard III of England and his short reign as King. Richard III is the final play in a cycle of eight plays written by Shakespeare dramatizing English history from 1398 to 1485. The theme of villainy is intricately explored throughout the play as one of its main themes. Shakespeare effectively explores the theme of villainy through the use of dramatic techniques such as character soliloquies and literary techniques such as symbolism. These techniques enable Shakespeare’s ideas of villainy to be developed and explored, which…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Richard the Lionheart and Saladin are known as some of the greatest leaders and warriors to fight in The Crusades. The book Warriors of God, by James Reston describes these two men throughout their battles in the Third Crusade. Many portrayals of these two men are either ones that make them look like the kindest of any of the Crusaders or some of the meanest, most gruesome men to fight. James Reston does a very good job of finding a medium between the two and gives the reader a good understanding of what these two great leaders were like without being biased.…

    • 1390 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Audiences at the time would have been shocked by his character and Shakespeare achieves this by contrasting what Richard…

    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A values that is used in both King Richard III and Looking for Richard is the value of integrity. In order to claim power to the throne, Richard uses much deceit and the misuse of power throughout the play, which highlights Richard’s lack of integrity. It is through such devious and detailed schemes that the audience is able understand the importance of the value of integrity throughout one’s life. One of the clear misuses of power can be seen in the scene of the innocent murder of the princes where Tyrrel expresses “The tyrannous and blood act is done, the most arch deed of piteous massacre that ever yet this land was guilty of…within their alabaster innocent arms. Their lips were four red roses on a stalk…A book of prayers on their pillow lay.” Through this quote, Tyrell describes the murder as the most ruthless in the country and pledges the innocence of the princes through their pure, white skin, red lips and uses religious imagery to describe their angelic innocence. The juxtaposition of the evil deed of their murder and the description of the innocence of the princes highlights the evil that has come out of…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Edmund In King Lear Essay

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages

    3a) From the text it can be seen that Edmund has been set as one of the Villains of the play. His inexorable position as a bastard in society has made Edmund bitter and resentful,…

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Richard iii

    • 1757 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Though still sick, King Edward IV brokers a reconciliation between Queen Elizabeth, Dorset, and Rivers and Hastings and Buckingham. Anon, Richard appears to reconcile with everyone else when Queen Elizabeth mentions her wish to have Clarence pardoned. To the shock of everyone, most especially to King Edward IV himself who claims that he had issued an order reversing Clarence’s condemnation, Richard informs the gathered assembly that Clarence is dead and buried, adding that the King’s countermand must have been too late to reverse the original edict and insinuating that the Queen is responsible; at this point, Stanley comes to beg the King to have a servant of his pardoned for killing a man. The request spurs the King to chide his subjects for their collective failure to plead on behalf of Clarence, arguing that it’s a crying shame that no one thought it his duty to stand up for a King’s brother when at this very moment a noble is standing up on behalf of a slave. Distressed, the King goes back to his room. The children of Clarence, question their grandmother, the Duchess, as to why she’s often so sad of late if not for the fact of their father‘s death. The Duchess replies that she’s sad because of her son’s Edward’s illness and that their father Clarence hasn’t died. The latter of the Duchess’ assertion, however, contradicts what the Boy knows to be truth as he has been told by his uncle, Richard, that the King has had their father killed and at the behest of the Queen. The Duchess assures the boy that his uncle has lied and wonders how she could have ever given birth to such a disgrace Richard. The Queen, accompanied by Rivers and Dorset, appears in a state of dishevelment. King Edward IV has died. She appears to be inconsolable, but Dorset and Rivers manage to calm her, arguing that she cannot begrudge God his payment and that she has yet her son, the Prince of Wales, from her marriage to King Edward IV, who will no doubt be King, on whom she may rely.…

    • 1757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Richard Iii

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Shakespeare also gives great insight on Richard’s mind via diction. In Richard’s opening lines he specifically says, “Our dreadful marches to delightful measures” (1,1,8). Instead of fighting the Lancasters Richard (and his family) are in a time of harmony. He intentionally changes the negative word to a positive. Lines like these are all throughout the opening soliloquy. Richard allows the audience to see that he is at peace, that he is relaxed. By his big soliloquy in Act 5, Richard’s attitude is down. He’s worried about all the deeds he’s done. He directly states, “Is there a murderer here? No. Yes, I am:” (5,3,211). Not only does he leave the negative word of “murderer” in the sentence, but he…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hamlet As A Tragic Hero

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the play Hamlet, written by Shakespeare, the main character Hamlet is often described as a hero. There are 6 criterion for a Shakespeare play to be considered a tragedy; the hero is a man of outstanding quality, the hero has a tragic flaw, the hero’s downfall is a result of his own choice, the audience has a “sad sense of wasted human potential”, the hero has an increase in awareness and a gain in self knowledge, and the audience experiences a cycle of good and bad emotions towards mankind. Hamlet is a great example of a tragic hero, one of his greatest attributes is also his biggest downfall.…

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    madness in the play. Characterization is representation of a character or characters on the stage…

    • 1400 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Richard Iii

    • 1660 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The audience of Richard III experiences a complex, ambiguous, and highly changeable relationship with the main character. Richard is clearly a villain—he declares outright in his very first speech that he intends to stop at nothing to achieve his nefarious designs. But despite his open allegiance to evil, he is such a charismatic and fascinating figure that, for much of the play, we are likely to sympathize with him, or at least to be impressed with him. Even characters such as Lady Anne, who has an explicit knowledge of his wickedness, allow themselves to be seduced by his brilliant wordplay, his skillful argumentation, and his relentless pursuit of…

    • 1660 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays