Rhetorical Analysis Of Jimmy Carter's The Arctic Refuge
Jimmy Carter uses rhetorical appeals, to convince the readers to agree with his ideology. He fascinates the readers, by describing his experience of the Arctic Refuge, and explaining how out of the ordinary this beautiful place is. Carter also describes in depth the intimate events he witnessed, creating an emotional attachment to the animals. Consequently he gives the readers no choice but to be empathetic towards this land, giving all the facts to completely draw in the audience. The way Carter writes about this land and its uniqueness, shows that this is not a sight you come across regularly. Carter uses phrases such as “ magnificent area “ to demonstrate to the readers it is not just a park or plot of grass and trees. Sometimes it can
…show more content…
He then proceeds to lay down all of the statistics, only once he has created fervent feeling for this land. He relays the facts in a way that make it coherent to the everyday person, once again making it relatable to the reader. In the article Carter states that “the Arctic Refuge might only provide 1 - 2 % of the oil our country provides each day “ therefore, saying that the amount of oil we would receive is extremely diminutive, compared to the amount of oil America is producing. Thus making the reader realize there are not tangible benefits of drilling for oil in the Arctic Refuge. Consequently making it almost impossible for the reader to not agree with the facts Carter is portraying . Jimmy Carter appeals to both emotional and logical senses throughout his article on the Arctic Refuge. Setting it up in a style in which, he begins by describing all of the heart melting moments he witnessed during his visits there. Then proceeding to hit the readers with hard facts and statistics; although, only after he has created the emotional attachment. Thus making it effortless for readers to choose his side over the oil drillers. The manner in which he maintains his argument in the article is concrete, and almost impossible to argue; because, he makes it captivating for all
He then proceeds to lay down all of the statistics, only once he has created fervent feeling for this land. He relays the facts in a way that make it coherent to the everyday person, once again making it relatable to the reader. In the article Carter states that “the Arctic Refuge might only provide 1 - 2 % of the oil our country provides each day “ therefore, saying that the amount of oil we would receive is extremely diminutive, compared to the amount of oil America is producing. Thus making the reader realize there are not tangible benefits of drilling for oil in the Arctic Refuge. Consequently making it almost impossible for the reader to not agree with the facts Carter is portraying . Jimmy Carter appeals to both emotional and logical senses throughout his article on the Arctic Refuge. Setting it up in a style in which, he begins by describing all of the heart melting moments he witnessed during his visits there. Then proceeding to hit the readers with hard facts and statistics; although, only after he has created the emotional attachment. Thus making it effortless for readers to choose his side over the oil drillers. The manner in which he maintains his argument in the article is concrete, and almost impossible to argue; because, he makes it captivating for all