Henry David Thoreau proved to be a man of strong beliefs, which he explained in his essay “Where I Lived and What I Lived For”, asking questions that he wanted the audience to ponder, such as, “Why should we live in such a hurry and waste life?” His goal in writing the essay, which is an excerpt from a grand collection of essays, was to convey his idea of the way that man should expand his knowledge for the sake of simply bettering himself and to disassociate himself from the technology to enjoy the nature that has been gifted to us. If men in the twenty-first century were to comply with the scheme that Thoreau examined in his essay, the economy and community would be at risk due to failure to communicate, so the philosophy would damage the aspects of life that man has become dependant on. Thoreau presented the philosophy that we blindly misuse the endowments of daily life in a frantic attempt to save time, although we never savor the time we have. He …show more content…
As a consequence, there would cease to be personal relationships with the people who live around you, which isolates you in occasion of disasters. Still without disasters, there would be people who are unable to support themselves in society of self-reliant standards, which would eradicate an entire group of people far beyond the means of natural selection. Given that speculation, Thoreau’s ideology would not be feasible in twenty first century communities.
Thoreau’s values of life would, however, be possible to live by for individuals who could sustain a secluded lifestyle. People who have become malcontent with the accepted standard could benefit from living based on his philosophy, because in today’s society the media pays lip service to individualism, but does not act on it. Thoreau exclaims “devote days and nights