Research Paper On Norman Rockwell
Lights, camera, paint brush, action! The thrill of creating a story through the lens of a camera and the fine hairs of a paintbrush was the life of Norman Rockwell. Capturing the small-town life of an everyday American scene was Rockwell’s way of creating the world that wasn’t perfect into his own view of a place that was. With the Rockwell creativity of drawing his perspective of an American perfection; Edward Hopper created otherwise. Creating more realistic and expressed his feelings into the paintings, going by one of his favorite art teachers, Robert Henri sayings, “Paint what you feel. Paint what you see. Paint what is real to you.” Norman Rockwell grew up wanting to be an artist as early as fourteen years old . Dropping out of high school at the age of sixteen to pursue his passion, he later attended the National Academy of Design and later transferred to the Art Students league of
…show more content…
His paintings were based on lonely, mysteries painting of everyday subjects. People enjoyed his painting as they “seemed to show life honesty, without trying to make it happier or prettier than it really was”. With the high of being successful during the Great Depression, he began to struggle in the nineteen sixties. New trends like abstract expressionist, took over the what was popular realistic paintings. This artist thought Hopper's style was no longer modern or important (Many things).
With two such amazing American artists it's hard to narrow it down to the main topic “who is the better artist”. With such a simple question, we must not only look how others view to paintings but their techniques and skills.
Hopper when it came to his lighting and technique he would rely on his memory, or sketches rather than paint from direct sight. He would paint “isolated figures, desolate urban scenes, and nineteenth-century Victorian architecture, all in strong contrasts of light and shadow from unusual and unexpected viewpoints”
His paintings were based on lonely, mysteries painting of everyday subjects. People enjoyed his painting as they “seemed to show life honesty, without trying to make it happier or prettier than it really was”. With the high of being successful during the Great Depression, he began to struggle in the nineteen sixties. New trends like abstract expressionist, took over the what was popular realistic paintings. This artist thought Hopper's style was no longer modern or important (Many things).
With two such amazing American artists it's hard to narrow it down to the main topic “who is the better artist”. With such a simple question, we must not only look how others view to paintings but their techniques and skills.
Hopper when it came to his lighting and technique he would rely on his memory, or sketches rather than paint from direct sight. He would paint “isolated figures, desolate urban scenes, and nineteenth-century Victorian architecture, all in strong contrasts of light and shadow from unusual and unexpected viewpoints”