Research Paper About K-12
Amidst the dogmas pushed through by the government of PNOY, the primer of the K-12 program is possibly the most idealistic program which it is ever happen in the education history. It aims to offer universal kindergarten education, while similarly adding two additional years of schooling at the high school level, taking the Philippines at par with international standards. Critics contend that, since resources are already spread so thin, quality, not quantity, must be the stress. Classrooms may not be enough. Teachers may be inadequate. Textbooks may not be as many as other schools have. Seats may not be sufficient. But the bottom line is that the government is not sleeping. They know what is lacking. They know what is needed. That is why they
…show more content…
A late starting age explains some children only start learning English at age six, which hinders their learning of core subjects imparted in English, such as math and science. Tertiary benefactors say they presently devote two of higher education’s four years teaching skills the secondary system ought to give. Should this responsibility be detached, extra time could be consumed on specializations, which would upsurge the skills of graduates. Filipinos naturally graduate at the age of 19 or 20, amongst the youngest in the …show more content…
No clear strategy has been established, nor have any expenses been calculated, even though a time limit for execution (2016) has been set. The significances of this change are widespread, lacking huge supplementary resources, and it is not clear where the money will be instituted. Supporting children for two extra years will also put larger financial heaviness on families.
Private universities are likewise at risk of being affected. Despite the fact that the public sector takes charge 87% of elementary and high school students, private universities take into account about 80% of tertiary education. If secondary schooling is prolonged, these foundations or institutions will take no additional intake for two years, resulting to a serious decrease in returns. Private schools offering both secondary and higher education will be less affected, but parents will have to pay dues for another two
A late starting age explains some children only start learning English at age six, which hinders their learning of core subjects imparted in English, such as math and science. Tertiary benefactors say they presently devote two of higher education’s four years teaching skills the secondary system ought to give. Should this responsibility be detached, extra time could be consumed on specializations, which would upsurge the skills of graduates. Filipinos naturally graduate at the age of 19 or 20, amongst the youngest in the …show more content…
No clear strategy has been established, nor have any expenses been calculated, even though a time limit for execution (2016) has been set. The significances of this change are widespread, lacking huge supplementary resources, and it is not clear where the money will be instituted. Supporting children for two extra years will also put larger financial heaviness on families.
Private universities are likewise at risk of being affected. Despite the fact that the public sector takes charge 87% of elementary and high school students, private universities take into account about 80% of tertiary education. If secondary schooling is prolonged, these foundations or institutions will take no additional intake for two years, resulting to a serious decrease in returns. Private schools offering both secondary and higher education will be less affected, but parents will have to pay dues for another two