Research Paper
Accounting Horizons
Vol. 26, No. 1
2012
pp. 21–41
American Accounting Association
DOI: 10.2308/acch-10197
Product Costs as Decision Aids: An Analysis of Alternative Approaches (Part 2)
Ramji Balakrishnan, Eva Labro, and K. Sivaramakrishnan
SYNOPSIS: In the first part of this two-part paper (Balakrishnan et al. 2012), we used a common platform to characterize four popular approaches for computing product costs.
In this part, we compare the approaches along three dimensions: (1) the cost of system implementation and maintenance, (2) the ability to provide decision-relevant data, and
(3) the provision of incentives to manage the demand for resources. As no system clearly dominates, we show how future approaches might blend the best features of current systems. Keywords: ABC; RCA; TDABC; costing systems.
INTRODUCTION
I
n Part 1 of this paper, we developed a common terminology and platform to characterize four well-known approaches for computing product costs as they have evolved over time. In particular, we described traditional volume-based allocation systems, activity-based costing
(ABC) systems, resource consumption accounting (RCA), and time-driven activity-based costing
(TDABC) systems. In this second part, we evaluate these systems on three important dimensions that are particularly relevant when considering the decision-making role for product costs:1
Ramji Balakrishnan is a Professor at The University of Iowa, Eva Labro is an Associate Professor at The
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and K. Sivaramakrishnan is a Professor at Texas A&M
University.
We thank Eddy Cardinaels, B. Douglas Clinton, Gary Cokins, Shane Dikolli, Stephen Hansen, Ella Mae Matsumura,
Karen Sedatole, Michael Shields, Naomi Soderstrom, K. Surysekar, Anton van der Merwe, and Timothy West for comments on earlier versions of this manuscript. Robert Kaplan and two anonymous referees helped us refine our message as well. We are responsible for
Vol. 26, No. 1
2012
pp. 21–41
American Accounting Association
DOI: 10.2308/acch-10197
Product Costs as Decision Aids: An Analysis of Alternative Approaches (Part 2)
Ramji Balakrishnan, Eva Labro, and K. Sivaramakrishnan
SYNOPSIS: In the first part of this two-part paper (Balakrishnan et al. 2012), we used a common platform to characterize four popular approaches for computing product costs.
In this part, we compare the approaches along three dimensions: (1) the cost of system implementation and maintenance, (2) the ability to provide decision-relevant data, and
(3) the provision of incentives to manage the demand for resources. As no system clearly dominates, we show how future approaches might blend the best features of current systems. Keywords: ABC; RCA; TDABC; costing systems.
INTRODUCTION
I
n Part 1 of this paper, we developed a common terminology and platform to characterize four well-known approaches for computing product costs as they have evolved over time. In particular, we described traditional volume-based allocation systems, activity-based costing
(ABC) systems, resource consumption accounting (RCA), and time-driven activity-based costing
(TDABC) systems. In this second part, we evaluate these systems on three important dimensions that are particularly relevant when considering the decision-making role for product costs:1
Ramji Balakrishnan is a Professor at The University of Iowa, Eva Labro is an Associate Professor at The
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and K. Sivaramakrishnan is a Professor at Texas A&M
University.
We thank Eddy Cardinaels, B. Douglas Clinton, Gary Cokins, Shane Dikolli, Stephen Hansen, Ella Mae Matsumura,
Karen Sedatole, Michael Shields, Naomi Soderstrom, K. Surysekar, Anton van der Merwe, and Timothy West for comments on earlier versions of this manuscript. Robert Kaplan and two anonymous referees helped us refine our message as well. We are responsible for
References: Abernethy, M. A., A. M. Lillis, P. Brownell, and P. Carter. 2001. Product diversity and costing system design choice: Field study evidence Al-Omiri, M., and C. Drury. 2007. A survey of factors influencing the choice of product costing systems in U.K Anderson, S., J. Hesford, and M. Young. 2002. Factors influencing the performance of activity-based costing teams: A field study of ABC model development time in the automobile industry. Balakrishnan, R., S. Hansen, and E. Labro. 2011. Evaluating heuristics used when designing product costing systems Balakrishnan, R., E. Labro, and K. Sivaramakrishnan. 2012. Product costs as decision aids: An analysis of alternative approaches (Part 1) Balakrishnan, R., and K. Sivaramakrishnan. 1996. Is assigning capacity costs to individual products necessary for capacity planning? Accounting Horizons 10 (3): 1–11. Balakrishnan, R., and K. Sivaramakrishnan. 2001. Sequential solutions to capacity-planning and pricing decisions Balakrishnan, R., and K. Sivaramakrishnan. 2002. A critical overview of the use of full-cost data for planning and pricing Balakrishnan, R., K. Sivaramakrishnan, and S. Sunder. 2004. A resource granularity framework for measuring opportunity costs Banker, R., G. Potter, and D. Schroeder. 1995. An empirical analysis of manufacturing overhead cost drivers Buchheit, S. 2003. Reporting the cost of capacity. Accounting, Organizations and Society 28 (6): 549–565. Byrne, S., E. Stower, and P. Torry. 2009. Is ABC adoption a success in Australia? Journal of Applied Management Accounting Research 7 (1): 37–52. Cardinaels, E., and E. Labro. 2008. On the determinants of measurement error in costing systems. The Accounting Review 83 (3): 735–756. Christensen, J., and J. Demski. 1997. Product costing in the presence of endogenous sub-cost functions. Clinton, B. D., and D. E. Keys. 2002. Resource consumption accounting: The next generation of cost management systems Cooper, R., and R. Kaplan. 1998. Cost and Effect: Using Integrated Cost Systems to Drive Profitability and Performance Cooper, R., and R. Kaplan. 2000. Design of Cost Management Systems. Cambridge, MA: HBS Press. Cooper, W. W., K. K. Sinha, and R. S. Sullivan. 1992. Measuring complexity in high-technology manufacturing: Indexes for evaluation Cotton, W., S. Jackson, and R. Brown. 2003. Note on a New Zealand replication of the Innes et al., U.K. Datar, S., and M. Gupta. 1994. Aggregation, specification, and measurement errors in product costing. The Accounting Review 69 (October): 567–591. Garrison, R., E. Noreen, and P. Brewer. 2009. Managerial Accounting. 12th edition. New York, NY: McGraw Hill-Irwin. Gosselin, M. 1997. The effect of strategy and organizational structure on the adoption and implementation of activity-based costing Govindarajan, V., and R. Anthony. 1983. How firms use cost data in price decisions. Management Accounting 65 (July): 30–36. Grasso, L. 2005. Are ABC and RCA accounting systems compatible with lean management? Management Accounting Quarterly 7 (1): 12–27. Gupta, M. 1993. Heterogeneity issues in aggregated costing systems. Journal of Management Accounting Research 5: 180–212. Innes, J., F. Mitchel, and D. Sinclair. 2000. Activity-based costing in the U.K.’s largest companies: A comparison of 1994 and 1999 survey results Kaplan, R. S., and S. R. Anderson. 2007a. The innovation of time-driven activity-based costing. Cost Management 21 (2): 5–15. Kaplan, R. S., and S. R. Anderson. 2007b. Time-Driven Activity- Based Costing. Boston, MA: HBS Press. Kiani, R., and M. Sangeladji. 2003. An empirical study about the use of the ABC/ABM models by some of the Fortune 500 largest industrial corporations in the USA Krumwiede, K. R. 1998. ABC: Why it’s tried and how it succeeds. Management Accounting 79 (April): 32–38. Labro, E., and M. Vanhoucke. 2007. A simulation analysis of interactions among errors in costing systems. Labro, E., and M. Vanhoucke. 2008. Diversity in resource consumption patterns and robustness of costing system to errors Lejeune, H., and J. H. Wearden. 2009. Vierordt’s The Experimental Study of the Time Sense (1868) and its legacy McNair, C. J. 2007. Beyond the boundaries: Future trends in cost management. Cost Management 21 (1): 10–21. Merchant, K. A., and M. D. Shields. 1993. When and why to measure costs less accurately to improve decision making Shields, M. 1995. An empirical analysis of firms’ implementation experiences with activity-based costing. Shim, E., and E. Sudit. 1995. How manufacturers price products. Management Accounting 76 (8): 37–39. Tse, M., and M. Gong. 2009. Recognition of idle resources in time-driven activity-based costing and resource consumption accounting models van der Merwe, A., and D. E. Keys. 2002. The case for resource consumption accounting. Strategic Finance 84 (10): 1–6. Webber, S., and B. D. Clinton. 2004. Resource consumption accounting applied: The Clopay case. West, T. D., E. A. Balas, and D. A. West. 1998. Health care policy and treatment costing systems: A field study