Research
TQM CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS FOR CONSTRUCTION FIRMS
Bhimaraya A. Metri*
Received: 8. 12. 2004. Preliminary communication
Accepted: 18. 10. 2005 UDC: 658.56:624
The construction industry has lagged behind other industries in implementing reform through total quality management. It has not followed the manufacturing industry in the implementation of TQM. The success of the total quality management (TQM) philosophy in manufacturing and other industries is forcing construction organizations to adopt TQM. This paper first outlines the imperatives of quality and its initiatives in the construction industry and then analyzes the critical success factors (CSFs) of the fourteen most prominent total quality management (TQM) frameworks. Based on the comprehensive analysis and examination of existing TQM frameworks and literature, the paper proposes the 10 critical success factors (CSFs) of TQM for construction industry. Finally, it describes the CSFs from the construction industry perspective.
1. INTRODUCTION
The construction industry of any country is the backbone of its infrastructure and economy. Though it is a major contributor to the economy of any country, it faces the problems of high fragmentation, instability, low productivity, poor quality and lack of standards. Abd. Majid and McCaffer (1998) further established that most countries are dealing with the same common problems despite the differences in their economies. Due to the above mentioned quality problems, construction clients are not satisfied with the performance achieved on many of their projects (Kometa & Olomolaiye 1997). Kometa & Olomolaiye (1997) state that despite many efforts, apart from time and cost overruns, unsatisfied clients and other difficulties continue to plague the industry. Thus the reputation of the construction industry is ill suited for meeting the competitive challenges of today’s fast changing market (Torbica & Stroh 1999), where the
Bhimaraya A. Metri*
Received: 8. 12. 2004. Preliminary communication
Accepted: 18. 10. 2005 UDC: 658.56:624
The construction industry has lagged behind other industries in implementing reform through total quality management. It has not followed the manufacturing industry in the implementation of TQM. The success of the total quality management (TQM) philosophy in manufacturing and other industries is forcing construction organizations to adopt TQM. This paper first outlines the imperatives of quality and its initiatives in the construction industry and then analyzes the critical success factors (CSFs) of the fourteen most prominent total quality management (TQM) frameworks. Based on the comprehensive analysis and examination of existing TQM frameworks and literature, the paper proposes the 10 critical success factors (CSFs) of TQM for construction industry. Finally, it describes the CSFs from the construction industry perspective.
1. INTRODUCTION
The construction industry of any country is the backbone of its infrastructure and economy. Though it is a major contributor to the economy of any country, it faces the problems of high fragmentation, instability, low productivity, poor quality and lack of standards. Abd. Majid and McCaffer (1998) further established that most countries are dealing with the same common problems despite the differences in their economies. Due to the above mentioned quality problems, construction clients are not satisfied with the performance achieved on many of their projects (Kometa & Olomolaiye 1997). Kometa & Olomolaiye (1997) state that despite many efforts, apart from time and cost overruns, unsatisfied clients and other difficulties continue to plague the industry. Thus the reputation of the construction industry is ill suited for meeting the competitive challenges of today’s fast changing market (Torbica & Stroh 1999), where the
References: 1. Abd. Majid, and McCaffer, R. (1998). Factors of non excusable delays that influence contractor 's performance. J. Management in Engineering, Vol.14, No. 3, pp. 42-49. 2. Ahire, S.L., Golhar, D.Y.and Waller, M. A. (1996). Development and validation of TQM implementation constructs. Decision Sciences, Vol. 27, No.1, pp. 23-56. 3. Ahire, S.L., and Ravichandran, T. (2001). An innovation diffusion model of TQM implementation. J. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 48, No. 4, pp.445-464. 4. Ambroz, M. (2004). Total quality system as a product of the empowered corporate culture. The TQM Magazine, Vol. 16. No. 2, pp. 93-104. 5. Ang, C. L., Davies, M. and Finlay, P N.( 2000). Measures to assess the impact of information technology on quality management, International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 42-65. 6. Arditi, D., and Gunayadin, H.M. (1998). Factors that affect process quality, in the life cycle of building projects. J. Construction Engineering and Management, Vol.124, No. 3, pp. 194-203. 7. Babbar, S. and Aspelin, D. (1994). J. TQM it is as easy as ABC. The TQM magazine, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 32-38. 8. Black, S. And Porter, L. (1996). Identification of critical factors of TQM. Decision Sciences, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 1-21. 9. Burati, J. L., Mathews, F. M., and Kalidindi, S. N. (1992). Quality management organisations and techniques. J. Construction Engineering and Management, Vol.118, No. 1, pp 112-118. 10. Belle, R. A. (2000). Benchmarking and enhancing best practices in engineering and construction sector. J. Management in Engineering, Vol.16, No.1, pp. 40-47. 11. Butch, K., and Rivers, D. (2001). TQM: Role of leadership and culture. J. Leadership and Organization Development, Vol. 22, No. 8, pp. 365-371. 12. Chan, E. H. W and Tse, R. Y. C. (2003). Cultural considerations in inter national construction contracts. J. Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 129, No. 4, pp. 375-381. 13. Culp, G., Smith, A., and Abbott, J. (1993). “Implementing TQM in consulting engineering firm.” J. Management in Engineering, Vol.9, No. 4, pp. 340-356. 14. Deming Prize (2004). Guide for Deming application prize – 2004. http://www.juse.or.jp 15 16. Federley, M O., and Chase, G.W. (1993). Applying total quality management to design and construction. J. Management in Engineering, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 357-364. 17. Flynn, B., Schoeder, R. and Sakibaba, S. S. (1994). A framework for quality management research and associated measurement instrument. Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 339-366. 18. Jabnoun, J., and Anwar, S. A. (2002). TQM and national culture: a contingency model. J. Productivity, Vol. 42, No. 4, pp. 591-596. 19. Jenner, R. A., Hebert, L., Appell, A., and Baack, J. (1998). Using quality management for cultural transformation of Chinese state enterprises: a case study. J. Quality Management, Vol. 3. No. 2, pp. 193-210. 20. Kiwus, C. H., and Williams, T. P. (2001). Application of TQM to environmental construction. J. Management in Engineering, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 176-183. 21. Kometa, T. S., and Olomolaiye, P. O. (1997). Factors influencing construction client 's decisions to build. J. Management in Engineering, Vol.13. No. 2, pp. 77-86. 22. Laszlo, G. P.(1998). Implementing a quality management program-3 Cs of success: commitment, culture, cost. The TQM Magazine, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp.281-287. 23. Lewis, D. (1996). The organizational culture saga - from OD to TQM: a critical review of the literature. Part 2 - applications. J. Leadership and Organization Development, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 9-16. 24. Mallon, J. C., and Mulligan, D. E. (1993). Quality function development-A system for meeting customer needs. J. Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 119, No. 3, pp. 516-531. 25. Manley, J. E. (1998). Symbol, ritual, and doctrine: the cultural ‘tool kit of TQM. J. Quality Management, Vol. 3. No. 2, pp. 175-191. 26. MBNQA (2004). Baldrige national quality program - 2004. http://quality.nist.gov 27 28. Nwabueze, U. (2001). How the mighty have fallen: the naked truth about TQM. Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol.16, No. 9, pp. 504-513. 29. Oakland, J.S. (1993). Total Quality Management: The Route to Improving Performance. Butterworth-Hienman Limited, Oxford, pp. 128 – 157. 30. Perry, C. (1997). Total quality management and reconceptualising management in Africa. J. International Business Review, Vol. 6. No. 3, pp. 233-243. 31. Pheng, L. S., and Wei, V. A. (1996). Framework for implementing TQM in construction. The TQM Magazine, Vol. 8, No. 5, pp. 39-46. 32. Roney, J. (1997). Cultural implications of implementing TQM in Poland. J. World Business, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp.152-158. 33. Rosenfed, Y., Warszawski, A., Laufer, A. (1992). Using quality circles to raise productivity and quality of work life. J. Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 118, No.1, pp. 17-33. 34. Saraph, J. V., George Benson, P., and Shroeder, R. G. (1989). An instrument for measuring the critical factors of quality management. Decision sciences, Vol. 20, No.4, pp. 811-829. 35. Schneider, W.E. (1994). The Reengineering Alternative: A Plan for Making Your Current Culture Work. McGraw-Hill/Irwin, New York, NY. 36. Sinclair, J., and Collins, D. (1994). Towards a Quality Culture? Int. J. Quality and Reliability Management, Vol. 11 No. 5, pp. 19-29. 37. Thiagarajan, T., Zairi, M. and Dale, B.G. (2001). A proposed model of TQM implementation based on an empirical study of Malaysian industry. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 289-306. 38. Torbica, Z. M., and Stroh, R.C. (1999). Impact of total quality management on home buyer satisfaction. J. Construction Engineering and Management, Vol.125, No. 3, pp 198-203. 39. Waldman, D. A., and Gopalakrishnan, M. (1996). Operational, organizational, and human resource factors predictive of customer perceptions of service quality. J. Quality Management Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 91-107. 40. Youssef, M. A., and Zairi, M. (1995). Benchmarking critical factors for TQM part-II – empirical results from different parts of the world. J. Benchmarking for Quality Management and Technology, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 3-19. 41. Zhang, Z., Waszink, A. and Wijngaard, J. (2000). An instrument for measuring TQM implementation for Chinese manufacturing companies. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, Vol. 17, No. 7, pp. 730-755. * Dr. Bhimaraya A. Metri, Ph.D., India Management Development Institute, P.O. Box No. 60, Mehrauli Road, Sukhrali, Gurgaon 122 001, India, Phone: + 91-124-5013050-59, 2349831-36, 2340153, 2340173 Ext 345, Fax: +91-124-2340147, E-mail: metri@mdi.ac.in