Preview

The Republic, written by Plato

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1071 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Republic, written by Plato
The Republic written by Plato examines many things. It mainly is about the Good life. Plato seems to believe that the perfect life is led only under perfect conditions which is the perfect society. Within the perfect society there would have to be justice. In the Republic it seems that justice is defined many different ways. In this paper I am going to discuss a few. First I am going to discuss the reason why Glaucon and Adeimantus see justice as being a bad thing and it is better to live a

unjust life.

Plato's elder brother Glaucon argues that the just man is only just because of the fear that he will get caught and punished or the fear of having a bad reputations. He explains this decision in the story of the two magic rings. The rings of magic would make a man invisible whenever he turns it on his finger. He believed that each man would act in the same manor. They would both break into houses unseen, and help themselves to whatever they wanted. The just man would no longer feel the need to be just. He would have two lifestyles one, being just in front of the eyes of the society and two being the unjust man invisible unable to get caught. Glaucon say this proves that people are just only because they find it necessary.

Adeimantus another philosopher and Socrates elder brother brought up the fact that we should take a look at the kinds of things people actually say when they get praised justice and condemn injustice. Adeimantus explains by saying that fathers tell there sons to be just because of the good reputations and social prestige that attaches to justice. So it is not justice itself that is recommended, but rather, the respectability that it brings with it. He believes that the son will realize to be just is only worth it if you can get a good reputation. Unless you are truly just the gods will punish you but as we have learned from the poets the gods can be bribed so if you

live the unjust life you can bribe the gods to not punish you. If an unjust

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    In this paper we will show that Glaucon and Thrasymachus' positions on justice are entirely different. We argue that Thrasymachus despite his slippage and confusion between a traditional and immoralist definition of justice, is really intending to illustrate a political system ruled by a rational-minded and exploitative tyrant. On the other hand Glaucon clearly presents justice as a necessary evil originating out of a social contract constructed by the weak of society. He then challenges Socrates to prove to him that the life of a just man is better than the life of an unjust man.…

    • 1831 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What is justice? Today, where it is common for people to only look out for themselves, justice is an extremely important tool. But what exactly is justice? What is right, what is wrong, and who decides that? To find an accurate definition, we as a society should not just focus on one opinion, but the views of many. Similar to how our society is today, the society in The Republic, lived the same, struggling to determine what the correct definition of justice was, and how to pursue the right answer. In the paper, I will be discussing all aspects of Plato’s Republic, including the Philosopher King and his nature, and justice in that time.…

    • 114 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In his philosophy, Plato places a large emphasis on the importance of the idea of justice. This emphasis can be seen especially in his work ‘The Republic’ where, through his main character Socrates, he attempts to define the nature of justice and to justify this definition. One of the methods used by Socrates to strengthen or rather explain his argument on justice is through his famous city-soul analogy, where a comparison between a just city and a just soul/individual is made. Through this analogy, Socrates attempts to explain the nature of justice, how it is the virtue of the soul and is therefore intrinsically valuable to the individual, but it becomes apparent in the analysis and evaluation of the analogy that there may have been several purposes behind it. Inconsistencies within the analogy itself also raise questions to the validity in Plato’s definition and justification of justice.…

    • 1949 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Glaucon vs. Socrates

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Glaucon argues that it is always and only external constraints that keep us from acting unjustly. To emphasize his point, Glaucon uses an example of two men and two magic rings. Both men are given the rings in which make them invisible. Once the just man is in possession of this ring, he is able to act unjustly with no fear of retaliation, the same as the unjust man would. With this, Glaucon states that the “actions of the just would be as the actions of the unjust; they would both come at last to the same point” (526). Therefore, the just man would be no greater than the unjust man. If you are never going to receive punishment, then who truly is living the “good life?” The unjust man who never gets caught or the just one? Glaucon claims that even the most just man would behave unjustly if he had owned such ring. This point proves that people are just only because they are afraid of punishment for being unjust, not because justice is desirable in itself.…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tharasymachus' has been listening to the discussion and has been eagerly waiting to interupt, he is convinced that he alone has the answer of what justice is. He states that justice "is in the interest of the stronger party" and its a virtue only intended for the weaker members of a society. According to Thrasymachus, the just man leads a good life because he is fearful of the repercussions of his actions and the unjust man is not fearful of these repercussions because he is stronger and more intelligent than the average citizen. These traits will allow him to avoid social comeback for his unjust actions. Furthermore, the more unjust a man is the stronger he becomes. Thrasymachus finally states that since the unjust man is living outside the law, he will lead a happier and more fruitful life because he is free from the social constraints of society.…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Plato, Machiavelli

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In Machiavelli's time, as it is today, the States whole reason for being was to serve the citizens. The ruler, therefore, is justified in doing whatever is necessary to maintain the country or state, even if it is unjust. In Plato's time, man served the state. According to the viewed that ethics and politics are the same, or at least co-terminous. There was no distinction between private life and public life, as there is today. Plato argues a ruler can never be unjust. Plato argues against this type of ruler, who rules solely by might. Plato tries to prove that it is always better to be just than unjust ,…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Glaucon and Adeimantus had both observed the prior arguments, but they were unpersuaded either way; specifically, Glaucon chooses a just life as he believes it to be more profitable than an unjust life (347e). However, since neither of these men are persuaded by reason, they want to understand if justice can be truly beautiful; for, their spiritedness makes them yearn for a correlation between justice and pure good. Up until this point these men seem to be teetering between complete commitment to justice, maybe even to the point of martyrdom, and a life appearing to be just in reputation, but unjust and cunning in actions and thoughts respectively. Socrates shatters the glass of idyllic justice by retorting, “they say that doing injustice…

    • 240 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thrasymachus, a famous Sophist philosopher, shared his theory that injustice has greater advantages than justice. He says that injustice is “superior to justice in strength and freedom and autocratic power.” This is because he believes that a just man always has the worst of it. Thrasymachus defines “just” as those who serve the interest of the stronger at the cost of the subject who obeys, and “injustice” as asserting authority over those innocents so that they may please their master, instead of having their own happiness or gaining an advantage. His bases his idea that the unjust are more successful than the just because the more honest of two competitors never comes off with the larger share and always sacrifices more than they need to. “If there is money to be distributed, the dishonest man will get it all.”He states that they miss out on so many advantageous opportunities that only the unjust man could claim. The unjust man can get the better of other people on a interest not to be just.…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Plato's Republic

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In Plato's Republic, Socrates goes to great lengths to explain and differentiate between the ideas of opinion and knowledge. Throughout society, most common men are lovers of sights and sounds. "Lovers of sights and sounds like beautiful sounds, colors, shapes, and everything fashioned out of them, but their thought is unable to see and embrace the nature of the beautiful itself (Republic 476b)." The few who do recognize the beautiful itself are followers of the sight of truth, the philosophers.…

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Socrates Is Not Guilty

    • 1916 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In the book, Plato Republic, Socrates had a discussion with Thrasymachus and Glaucon about justice and unjustice. In this essay, I shall argue that Plato’s solution of the temptation of the ring is successful in a few ways. I will describe Thrasymachus and Glaucon’s idea about justice, and how Socrates discuss with them in terms of the justice of the city, justice of individual soul, his theory of forms and the importance of the knowledge of the good, and the sun analogy and the allegory of the cave.…

    • 1916 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Platos Republic

    • 1792 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Socrates describes a perfect city in Plato’s The Republic. Many questions are asked in the book, such as “What is an ideal city?” Or, “What is justice?” And, “Is justice in the city possible?” Socrates tries to find the real meaning of the word justice. He starts with justice within a single person, and then he tries to take that concept and apply it to the city. Then, to figure out the perfect city, he goes back to the single person to find justice there. He shows that the perfect city needs the people in it to be assigned to their place. People who play their role in the city must be people of justice for the city to have justice.…

    • 1792 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Why Be Moral

    • 1109 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Plato writes in The Republic about a place of ideal perfection, especially in laws, government, and social conditions, called the city. This city has three parts to it, Guardians, Soldiers, and Workers that make it function justly (Rosen, 2005). The analogy that he gives to a just city he also compares to that of a three part person. Plato claims that people have three parts to them- reason, spirit, and appetite (Clark & Poortenga, 2003). If the just city can live and abide by the four virtues of wisdom, courage, moderation, and justice, then so can a just person (Clark & Poortenga, 2003). Justice is defined by Plato as a morality or righteousness. He uses the Greek word Dikaisyne, which ultimately means righteousness. Living a life of righteousness, or a moral life, will bring human happiness (Clark & Poortenga, 2003).…

    • 1109 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle on Justice

    • 2000 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The criticism I am concerned with here challenges the notion that specific justice is a moral virtue. I shall argue that the solution to this challenge is to carefully distinguish between the results arising from mis-distributions of these social goods, the concern of specific distributable justice, and the resulting harm to others. I shall argue that there is an objectively specific unjust feature to these mis-distributions that requires rectificatory justice. In response to the first criticism, I shall argue that this criticism, in effect, fails to do justice to Aristotle's distinction between general and specific justice. In cases where an agent commits an act of general injustice, rectificatory justice is needed to address the resulting imbalance in the distribution pattern of social goods…

    • 2000 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Public Morality

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Plato provides perhaps the most enlightening view of the concept of justice. Indeed, his writings serve as the basis for many of the later philosophers which would follow in his footsteps (Dantzig, 1955). In The Republic he…

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Justice that love gives is a surrender, justice that law gives is a punishment” - Mahatma Gandhi…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays