Relationship Between Social Capital and Crime in Rural Australia
Abstract
The paper investigates the relationship between social capital and crime in rural Australia. First the paper outlines the conceptualisation of social capital which has informed this research. It suggests two key links between social capital and crime which has led researchers to utilise the latter as a proxy measure of the former and questions the theoretical justification for this by reference to the concepts of bonding, bridging and linking social capital. The paper then provides an overview of key themes within criminological research in rural Australia. Using original empirical data from research undertaken in rural Queensland the paper explores the relationship between social capital and crime within the context of small rural communities, emphasising the role of the local newspaper in influencing local opinion on issues of law and order. The empirical results challenge the established theoretical connection between social capital and crime and suggest that the level of crime cannot be used as a simple proxy for the level of social capital. The results also illustrate the manifestation of the downside of social capital and suggest that the concept of linking social capital plays a critical role in fostering a tolerance of diversity within otherwise cohesive and functional communities.
Keywords: Social capital, crime, rural Australia, small towns, newspaper reporting.
Introduction
In an effort to expand on theory surrounding the concept of social capital, researchers are understandably keen to utilise easily accessible data to measure levels of social capital across time and space. However, several critics have questioned the validity of research findings which, it is argued, have failed to adequately conceptualise the multifaceted nature of social capital. Such studies have subsequently used inappropriate or inadequate tools for its measurement thus undermining the value of the concept (Mohan & Mohan, 2002; Stone, 2001; Woolcock,
The paper investigates the relationship between social capital and crime in rural Australia. First the paper outlines the conceptualisation of social capital which has informed this research. It suggests two key links between social capital and crime which has led researchers to utilise the latter as a proxy measure of the former and questions the theoretical justification for this by reference to the concepts of bonding, bridging and linking social capital. The paper then provides an overview of key themes within criminological research in rural Australia. Using original empirical data from research undertaken in rural Queensland the paper explores the relationship between social capital and crime within the context of small rural communities, emphasising the role of the local newspaper in influencing local opinion on issues of law and order. The empirical results challenge the established theoretical connection between social capital and crime and suggest that the level of crime cannot be used as a simple proxy for the level of social capital. The results also illustrate the manifestation of the downside of social capital and suggest that the concept of linking social capital plays a critical role in fostering a tolerance of diversity within otherwise cohesive and functional communities.
Keywords: Social capital, crime, rural Australia, small towns, newspaper reporting.
Introduction
In an effort to expand on theory surrounding the concept of social capital, researchers are understandably keen to utilise easily accessible data to measure levels of social capital across time and space. However, several critics have questioned the validity of research findings which, it is argued, have failed to adequately conceptualise the multifaceted nature of social capital. Such studies have subsequently used inappropriate or inadequate tools for its measurement thus undermining the value of the concept (Mohan & Mohan, 2002; Stone, 2001; Woolcock,
References: Alston, M. (2002). Social capital in rural Australia. Rural Society, 12(2), 93-104. Alston, M Banfield, E. (1958). The moral basis of a backward society. New York: Free Press. Barclay, E Barnett, C., & Mencken, F. C. (2002). Social disorganization theory and the contextual nature of crime in non-metropolitan counties. Rural Sociology, 67(3), 372-393. Bourdieu, P Bubolz, M. (2001). Family as source, user, and builder of social capital. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 30, 129-131. Carcach, C Castle, E. N. (2002). Social capital: An interdisciplinary concept. Rural Sociology, 67(3), 331-349. Coleman, A Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95-S120. Coleman, J Cox, E., & Caldwell, P. (2000). Making policy social. In I. Winter (Ed.), Social capital and public policy in Australia, (pp. 43-73). Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies. Cunneen, C Cunneen, C., & Robb, T. (1987). Criminal justice in north-west New South Wales. Sydney: NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research. Dempsey, K Dupre, M. E., & Mackey, D. A. (2001). Crime in the public mind: Letters to the editor as a measure of crime salience. Journal of Criminal Justice and Popular Culture, 8(1), 1-24. Durkheim, E Falk, I., & Kilpatrick, S. (2000). What is social capital? A study of interaction in a rural community. Sociologia Ruralis, 40(1), 87-110. Frank, R Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. Harmondsworth: Penguin. Fukuyama, F Graber, D. (1980). Crime news and the public. New York: Praeger Publishers. Graycar, A Hogg, R., & Carrington, K. (2003). Violence, spatiality and other rurals. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 36(3), 293-319. Jobes, P Kawachi, I., Kennedy, B. P., & Wilkinson, R. G. (1999). Crime: Social disorganization and relative deprivation. Social Science and Health, 48(6), 719-731. Kennedy, B Kennedy, B. P., Kawachi, I., Prothrow-Smith, D., Lochner, K., & Gupta, V. (1998b). Social capital, income inequality, and firearm violent crime. Social Science and Medicine, 47(1), 7-17. Knack, S Knack, S., & Keefer, P. (1997). Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross-country investigation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(4), 1251-1288. La Macchia, G Macgregor, C. J., & Cary, J. (2002). Social/Human Capital Rapid Appraisal Model (SCRAM): A method of remotely assessing social and human capacity in Australian rural communities. Rural Society, 12(2), 105-122. Macmillan, R Mohan, G., & Mohan, J. (2002). Placing social capital. Progress in Human Geography, 26(2), 191-210. Narayan, D., & Pritchett, L Newton, K. (1997). Social capital and democracy. American Behavioral Scientist, 40(5), 575-586. O 'Connor, M., & Gray, D Onyx, J., & Bullen, P. (2000). Sources of social capital. In I. Winter (Ed.), Social capital and public policy in Australia (pp. 105-135). Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies. Portes, A., & Landolt, P Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Putnam, R Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster. Putnam, R Queensland Office of Economic and Statistical Research (2003). Small area crime profiles. Retrieved October 15, 2003 from Queensland Treasury. www.oesr.qld.gov.au.