Preview

Reinterpreting the Learning Organization

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
8946 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Reinterpreting the Learning Organization
Reinterpreting the learning organisation
Deb Stewart

Introduction
The concept of the learning organisation (LO) has gone through many combinations and permutations over the last decade in terms of theoretical development and attempts at practical application. The fervent interest in the LO stems from what Senge (1990; Senge et al., 1994) calls the age of globalisation where one source of competitive advantage is the ability and rate at which an organisation can learn and react more quickly than its competitors. Some writers have used the term LO interchangeably with organisational learning (OL) while others have attempted to draw clear distinctions between the two. There appears to be little consensus about what a LO organisation looks like or what OL means. Furthermore there seems little agreement on the relationship between individual learning and collective learning in organisations and how one translates into the other. This paper initially provides a cursory glimpse at the current literature on the LO in the context of learning and OL and in particular the theoretical tensions and dilemmas existing between these concepts. Management theorists have under-utilised the insights and practices from other disciplines such as sociology, philosophy and anthropology. As Burrell (1994) argues:
Sooner or later organisation studies must enter an area where philosophy and social science meet. Organisation studies must also enter intellectual theory where the well-established French and German traditions of social theory meet.

The author Deb Stewart is a Lecturer in the School of Management, Victoria University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. Keywords Learning organization, Organizational learning, Organizational change, Metaphor, Narratives Abstract Examines the theoretical and practical development of the concept of the learning organisation (LO). Some theorists have used the term LO interchangeably with organisational learning, while others have drawn



References: Altman, Y. and Illes, P. (1998), ``Learning, leadership, teams: corporate learning and organisational change ' ', Journal of Management Development, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 44-55. Argyris, C. and Schon, D. (1978), Organisational Learning: A Theory-Action Perspective, Addison Wesley, Reading, MA. Argyris, C. and Schon, D. (1991), Organisational Learning, Addison Wesley, Reading, MA. Argyris, C. and Schon, D. (1996), Organisational Learning II, Theory, Method and Practice, Addison Wesley, Reading, MA. Bateson, G. (1979), Mind and Nature, Dutton, New York, NY. Battersby, D. (1999), ``The learning organisation and CPE: some philosophical considerations ' ', The Learning Organization, Vol. 6 No. 2, pp. 58-62. Bolman, L. and Deal, T. (1997), Reframing Organisations, 2nd ed., Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA. Bourdieu, P. (1990), The Logic of Practice, trans. Richard Nice, Polity Press, Cambridge. 151 Reinterpreting the learning organisation Deb Stewart The Learning Organization Volume 8 . Number 4 . 2001 . 141±152 Bourdieu, P. (1992), Language and Symbolic Power, tr. Gino Raymond and Matthew Adamson, Polity Press, Cambridge. Bourdieu, P. (1993), The Field of Cultural Production, Randal Johnson (Ed.), Polity Press, Cambridge. Bourdieu, P. and Wacquant, L. J. D. (1992), An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology, The University of Chicago Press, Cambridge. Buckler, B. (1998), ``Practical steps towards a learning organisation: applying academic knowledge to improvement and innovation in business process ' ', The Learning Organization, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 15-23. Burgoyne, J. (1995), ``Feeding minds to grow the business ' ', People Management, September, pp. 22-8. Burrell, G. (1994), ``Habermas ' ', Organisational Studies, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 1-19. Calhoun, C., LiPuma, E. and Postone, M. (1993), Bourdieu, Critical Perspectives, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL. Calvert, G., Mobley, S. and Marshall, L. (1994), ``Grasping the learning organisation ' ', Training and Development, June, pp. 39-43. Carr, D. (1991), ``Discussion: Ricoeur on narrative ' ', in Wood, D. (Ed.), On Paul Ricoeur: Narrative and Interpretation, Routledge, London, pp. 160-74. Cresswell, T. (1997), ``Weeds, plagues, and bodily secretions: a geographical interpretation of metaphors of displacement ' ', Annals of the Association of American Geographers, Vol. 87 No. 2, pp. 330-45. Cullen, J. (1999), ``Socially constructed learning: a commentary on the concept of the learning organisation ' ', The Learning Organization, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 45-52. Drummond, G. (1998), ``New theorizing about organisations ' ', Current Topics in Management, No. 3, pp. 93-122. Handy, C. (1997), The Hungry Spirit, Beyond Capitalism, Hutchinson, London. Hawkins, P. (1994), ``The changing view of learning ' ', in Burgoyne, J., Pedler, M. and Boydell, T., Towards the Learning Company: Concepts and Practices, McGraw Hill, London. Ikehara, H. T. (1999), ``Implications of Gestalt theory and practice for the learning organisation ' ', The Learning Organization, Vol. 6 No. 2, pp. 63-9. Kerby, A.P. (1991), Narrative and the Self, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN. Kofman, F. and Senge, P. (1993), ``Communities of commitment: the heart of learning organisations ' ', Organizational Dynamics, No. 2, Autumn. Kolb, D.A. (1984), Experiential Learning, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1980), Metaphors We Live By, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL and London. McHugh, D., Groves, D. and Alker, A. (1998), ``Managing learning: what do we learn from a learning organisation ' ', The Learning Organization, Vol. 5 No. 5, pp. 209-20 MacIntyre, A. (1981), After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory, Duckworth, London. Massey, C. and Walker, R. (1999), ``Aiming for organisational learning: consultants as agents of change ' ', The Learning Organization, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 38-44. Mirvis, P.H. (1996), ``Historical foundations of organisational learning ' ', Journal of Organisational Change Management, Vol. 9 No. 1, pp. 13-31. Morgan, G. (1993), Imaginisation, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA. Morgan, G. (1997), Images of Organisations, 2nd ed., Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA. Overmeer, W. (1997), ``Business integration in a learning organisation: the role of management development ' ', Journal of Management Development, Vol. 16 No. 4, pp. 245-61. Palmer, I. and Dunford, R. (1996), ``Reframing and organisational action: the unexplored link ' ', Journal of Organisational Change Management, Vol. 9 No. 6, pp. 12-25. Revans, R. (1982), The Origins and Growth of Action Learning, Chartwell-Bratt, London. Reynolds, R. and Ablett, A. (1998), ``Transforming the rhetoric of organisational learning to the reality of the learning organisation ' ', The Learning Organization, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 24-35. Rhodes, C. (1996), ``Research organisational change and learning: a narrative approach ' ', The Qualitative Report, Vol. 2 No. 4. Rhodes, C. (1997), ``The legitimisation of learning in organisational change ' ', Journal of Organisational Change Management, Vol. 10 No. 1. Ricoeur, P. (1984), Time and Narrative, Vol. 1, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL. Ricoeur, P. (1985), Time and Narrative, Vol. 2, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL. Rifkin, W. and Fulop, L. (1997), ``A review and case study on learning organisations ' ', The Learning Organization, Vol. 4 No. 4, pp. 135-48. Schafer, R. (1992), Retelling a Life: Narration and Dialogue in Psychoanalysis, HarperCollins, Philadelphia, PA. Senge, P.M. (1990), The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organisation, Doubleday Currency, New York, NY. Senge, P.M., Roberts, C., Ross, T.N., Smith, B.J. and Kleiner, A. (1994), The Fifth Discipline Fieldbook: Strategies and Tools for Building a Learning Organisation, Doubleday/Currency, London. Sievers, B. (1994), Work, Death, and Life Itself. Essays on Management and Organisations, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, New York. Smircich, L. and Morgan, G. (1982), ``Leadership: the management of meaning ' ', Journal of Applied Behavioural Science, Vol. 18 No. 3, pp. 257-73. Smith, P. and Tosey, P. (1999), ``Assessing the learning organisation: part 1 ± theoretical foundations ' ', The Learning Organization, Vol. 6 No. 2, pp. 70-75. Steiner, L. (1998), ``Organisational dilemmas as barriers to learning ' ', The Learning Organization, Vol. 5 No. 4, pp. 193-201. Swain, P. (1999), ``Organisational learning: developing leaders to deal with continuous change ± a strategic human resource perspective ' ', The Learning Organization, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 30-37. Teare, R. and Dealtry, R. (1998), ``Building and sustaining a learning organisation ' ', The Learning Organization, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 47-60. Tran, V. (1998), ``The role of the emotional climate in learning organizations ' ', The Learning Organization, Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 99-103. 152

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Senge, P. M. (2006). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York, NY: Doubleday.…

    • 1945 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    BUSI 610 Group DB Forum 1

    • 2057 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Purhaghshenas, S. H., & Esmatnia, M. (2012). Learning Organizations. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 4(7), 243-249. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1271924293?accountid=12085…

    • 2057 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    According to Peter M. Senge, a learning organization is “an organization where people continually expand their capacity to create the results they truly desire, where new and expansive patterns of thinking are nurtured, where collective aspiration is set free, and where people are continually learning how to learn together”. It is an organization wherein there is continuous expanding of knowledge, people or businesses learning from one another and capacity to create for the betterment of its future. There should be continuous learning because time continues on going, not waiting for anyone, so we are the ones that should adapt to the changes occurring. To not be left behind in the business world, there should be adaptation and innovation, which would be a great competitive advantage. There are different reasons for the success and failure of businesses and one of the possible reasons for failure is that the company has become complacent and thought that they do not need to learn anything anymore, but that is wrong. A company should be ready to adjust to the whole business activity and also in the traditional operations. Senge believes that we are all learners and all we need to have a learning community is to be able to influence people to be committed and capable to learn at all levels.…

    • 2586 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    (TCOs A& B) What is organizational learning? Why is it important for firms to emphasize organizational learning? (Points: 10)…

    • 19747 Words
    • 79 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    eeoc

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Organizational learning theory states that, in order to be competitive in a changing environment, organizations must change their goals and actions to reach those goals. In order for learning to occur, however, the firm must make a conscious decision to change actions in response to a change in circumstances, must consciously link action to outcome, and must remember the outcome.…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Senge, P. M. (2006). The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. New York, NY: Doubleday.…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In today's dynamic and unstable operating conditions of enterprises the ability to innovate is a key factor of survival and success of the organization. Innovations in this case are understood in a broad sense – it means not only to create and offer a new product, but rather the ability of the organization continually develop creative solutions to problems and challenges. In this regard, the role of intangible assets of the organization, especially the knowledge and experience, should be possessed by members of the organization. The concept of "learning organization” forms the approach to management, allowing the most efficient use of data and increasing intangible assets. Why it’s called “learning” organization? Learning involves, on the one hand, self-learning - formation of experience by the individual, but on the other hand - learning is the process of acquiring knowledge from outside. Learning can also be regarded as a “cognition” that includes an analysis of experience, establishing causation and development. To the problems of training and learning in the organization are devoted a lot of modern management concepts and approaches: organizational development, change management, knowledge management, learning by acting. Analysis of these approaches suggests that in relation to the concept of learning organization these approaches serve as methods to make the transition to a learning organization, to create conditions for its occurrence.…

    • 5694 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Tsang EWK. Organizational learning and the learning organization: A dichotomy between descriptive and prescriptive research. Hum Relat. 1997;50(1):73–90.…

    • 1508 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Senge (2006), defines a learning organization as “an organization where people continually expand the capacity to create the results the truly desire, where new and expansive patterns of thinking are nurtured, where collective aspirations are set free, and where people are continually learning to see the whole together”. In other words, an organization will become a learning organization when all members of the organization (management and front-line employees) learn to cooperatively develop, improve on, expand their abilities, and performance through openness and continuous learning based on previous…

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Learning Culture

    • 1575 Words
    • 6 Pages

    2. O’Keeffe, T. 2002. Organizational Learning: a new perspective. Journal of European Industrial Training, 26 (2), pp. 130-141.…

    • 1575 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    In terms of learning organizations, Senge (1990), states that the basic meaning of a learning organization is an organization that is continually expanding its capacity to create its future, and “System thinking”, his fifth…

    • 2314 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Peter Senge described learning organizations as places where “people continually expand their capacity to create the results they truly desire, where new and expansive pattern thinking are nurtured, where collective aspiration is set free, and where people are continually learning to learn together. Each of these disciplines involves a body of theory and techniques that must be practiced in order for mastery to develop” (Senge 1990). The disciplines are systems thinking, personal mastery, mental models, shared vision, and team learning.…

    • 1817 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Danone Case Study

    • 7355 Words
    • 30 Pages

    Garvin, D.A., Edmonson, A.C. and Gino, F., 2008, “Is yours a learning organization”, Harvard Business Review, item 08 -03, p. 3…

    • 7355 Words
    • 30 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    5 Disciplines

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The first discipline is “Shared vision” a common view of what the goal is, Second discipline is “Mental models”, the practice of self-awareness and its effect on the organization. Third is “Personal Mastery” being open, self-aware and reflective while changes occur. Fourth is “Team Learning” collaboration of ideas and fifth is “System thinking” seeing the organization as a machine and every moving part involved in making the machine work. This can influence change per Yoder-Weiss (2015) “a culture that promote employee engagement and participation generate an environment s that embrace change.”(p. 313).…

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays