Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Reign of Terror

Good Essays
375 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Reign of Terror
After the fall of monarchy, the French revolutionaries faced large popular insurrections and division among the people. In the early days of the revolution, many people still sided with the monarchy which brought on accusations of treason against the new republic. A new stable government was needed to end the chaos, and the Committee of Public Safety was created with Maximilien Robespierre as its leader. He wanted to create a "republic of virtue" in which the government would force the people to become virtuous republicans through a massive reeducation program. And thus began the Reign of Terror which had the purpose to eliminate opposition and to cow citizens into submission. For Robespierre, the Terror was necessary and inevitable to maintain the Republic by revealing the enemy within France. However, the Reign of Terror proved to be a distortion of revolutionary ideals because instead of helping the country to unify and obtain greatness, in essence it victimized its own citizens.

As Robespierre eloquently explained, the main goal of the French Revolution was "the peaceful enjoyment of liberty and equality." (Lualdi, pp. 116). The revolutionaries wanted a fair government that could allow all social classes to enjoy the same rights without making the huge distinction with aristocrats. There was an immense gap between the First Estate and the Third Estate, and the revolutionaries were trying to diminish it. (Hunt, pp. 593). However, the reign of Terror did nothing to promote liberty or equality. Instead, it terrorized the people through executions in the guillotine and desperate measures. Robespierre wanted what was best for the people, and eventually he believed what was best for the people could only be achieved by ruling over them. He wanted control over people's lives and believed that ruling with an iron fist would move the country forward. Robespierre talked about natural virtue in his speech, and emphasized that a nation becomes corrupt when the people lose their character, liberty and virtue. (Lualdi, pp. 117). The irony in this is that he lost his character and the basic ideas of the Revolution in the process of ending with the opposition. He started believing in the equality of the people, but his believes soon turned around. The bottom line of the Reign of Terror is

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Lastly , the introduction to the proposal of a ‘Republic of virtues;angered many people.First, the Republic of virtue angered many people when Robespierre introduc it.that is to say ,the idea of the ‘Republic of virtus’ association with the de-christianization of France during the French Revolution;where the Christianicimos process involved the closing of churches,and the selling of many churches. These were the causes that provoked a…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    He believed France could achieve a “republic of virtue” only through the use of terror. Robespierre was on the chief architects of the Reign of Terror, which lasted from September 1793 to July 1794. In order to try to bring about this change in government, revolutionary courts conducted hasty trials. Robespierre explained that terror was necessary to achieve the goals of the revolution. During the Reign of Terror, about 300,000 people were arrested and seventeen thousand were executed, all suspected of resisting the revolution.…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Even though the Committee of Public Safety led France with almost forty thousand people executed in a reign of terror, they ultimately protected the future of the revolution and its values through their increased legitimacy and their encouragement of fraternity and equality.…

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reign of Terror DBQ

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “The King’s blood flowed and cries of joy from eight thousand armed men struck my ears.” A man that witnessed the guillotining of King Louis XVI was left with this graphic image of a memorable event leading to the Reign of Terror. The Reign of Terror, otherwise known as the French Revolution, was an attempt to form a new government in France. The citizens of France fought against their government and made a new government led by Maximilen de Robespierre. This new government executed large numbers of individuals whom were “enemies” of the Revolution. This government went so far to preserve their vision of liberty and equality. France was violently demanding “Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity”. Was it necessary to murder 30,000 by guillotining them in the middle of town square for everyone to witness? Did the 2,750 people sentenced to death without any evidence deserve their fate? The Reign of Terror was not justified because of the reaction towards external threats, the treatment of internal threats, and the malevolent methods used by this new government to carry-out their vision of a perfect government.…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    DBQ: Reign of Terror

    • 656 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Not only was the Reign of Terror a big part of the French Revolution but it was a very unjustified event, creating sins among the people. They treated the dead as heads and bodies of simple animals rather than thinking of them as once humans. “Carried it mockingly, upside down on a cart, offering it to passers-by to spit on”(59). The people then went against the churches abolishing holidays which were important to many people and their beliefs. They also killed thousands, “many of these people were guillotined”(63). They would cut the heads of criminals and even innocent without trial. The guillotine began very popular through these months, becoming the number one way of killing. “The guillotine became one of the most powerful symbols of the French Revolution… It had a sharp, angled blade, which dropped quickly on a guided track”(65). These months were very gruesome for the people of france and many families, to where no one felt safe. These murders were sins, killed without reason or trial making the Reign of Terror unjustified.…

    • 656 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reign Of Terror Dbq

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Reign Of Terror was an unjustified part of the French Revolution. These hateful and vengeful acts led to an outburst of fear amongst the french people. What once started as a start to a new government led to an unexpected ruling of Maximilien Robespierre. Robespierre was the leader of the Public Safety Committee, and the reason king Louis XVI and many others were executed. He wanted to lead the french people to victory during this revolution, but the power corrupted him. Thus leading to the reign of terror and later his own death by the people.…

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Reign of Terror began because of the growing suspicion of common people supporting the nobles, and the monarchy. The first victim of this historic era was King Louis XVI, and he was most certainly not the last. Nine months later, Queen Marie Antoinette was too executed by the guillotine. The people were bound to their homes in fear of being accused of committing an offence, leading to arrest or death. Police spies were present all over Paris arresting both guilty and innocent, executing them because of pure suspicion. Some individuals were imprisoned or executed for having been wealthy, or talking to other people outside of their homes. (Doc. 6) This event ended with the beheading of Robespierre, one of the founders of the Reign of Terror, because suspicion became too disorderly and was destroying France as a whole. This mark in French history had to occur in order to show the nobles and the monarchs that they ( the people) weren't going back to the old society, where they had no say and were under unruly law. The founders of the revolution had to instill fear to ensure that the government wouldn't revert back what once…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout time, people have overthrown governments for a variety of social, political, and economic reasons. When basic needs aren't met and natural rights aren't protected, people start to question the government's morals and ideals. in the 18th century, the citizens of France were inspired by the Enlightenment ideas of Locke, Voltaire, and Rousseau, as well as the success of the American Revolution. As a reaction to their unfair treatment, the people of the Third Estate rebelled against the government, and eventually, after many deaths and changes of power, the people finally received their much-deserved rights. There were many well-justified causes of the French Revolution, and although many horrible effects presented themselves, the resulting…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He also makes his first demands regarding democratic principles: freedom of opinion, of the press, political equality for all citizens, the abolition of slavery, and of the death penalty. Following the Girondist party’s claim that France should go to war with Austria, he also attempts to oppose himself to this declaration of war, but to no effect. Once the war declared, Robespierre feared the uprise of counter-revolutionists. Following France’s destructive defeats at the beginning of the battle, the revolutionary apprehended a possible military coup d’etat, notably by the Marquis de Lafayette who communicated his urge to abolish the Jacobin Club. Robespierre’s foremost objective was to suppress the monarchy.…

    • 1818 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Was Robespierre Justified

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Terror that Robespierre helped to instate in France was a policy that was known to be horrific. Even though this ideology was violent in nature, Robespierre thought that it was completely justified. Robespierre made very clear that the interests of the Republic were of utmost importance. He described how there were both internal and external forces working to dismantle the Republic, and that the supporters of the Republic should value reason while the Republic's enemies should experience terror. He made a point that terror in this case was not about intense fear as the word's definition implies, but rather stern justice toward those who did not support his policy. This description embodied Robespierre's concept on terror during this time,…

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reign Of Terror DBQ

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Reign of Terror was unjustified because their punishments were inhumane. Even the littlest thing could get you to be killed. If someone didn’t like you or suspected something bad about you, it could get you killed. Many politicians didn’t agree with the ideas of Robespierre, so he had them be decapitated. The town of Lyons didn’t approve of the National Convention’s authority so “revolutionaries destroyed 1600 homes and chopped off 12 heads in five minutes (Doc.C).” It was a cruel way for Robespierre to get rid of them. The reign of Terror also took away the people's freedom. The people couldn’t really do anything without being watched or suspected of doing something against the government.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The ‘Reign of Terror' was the name given to the actions of the ‘Committee of Public Safety' from the years between 1791-1794. Their actions can be justified, but can hold just as much criticism along with it. In my opinion, there could have been better ways to move the revolution along and the ‘Reign of Terror' should have never happened.…

    • 1255 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reign of Terror

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Reign of Terror is the period of the French revolution since September 5, 1793, to July 27 1794. It was a civil and a foreign war, where the government decided to terrify the people of France, and to take harsh consequences against those who were against the revolution, like the nobles and priests. The government forced terror in the hearts of the French. Approximately 40,000 people die during the Terror. About 15% were the nobles and clergy. Another 15% were the middle class. The rest were peasants. The brain of the terror is the Guillotine. It was blade, which dropped fast, and the victim would not feel pain. Dr. Joseph Guillotine created the Guillotine, and it quickly became a symbol of horror in the Reign of Terror. Another method used in the period of Terror was The Breaking Wheel. The Breaking wheel was the famous execution before the Guillotine. The Breaking Wheel was a torture device where they attach a person to the wheel and rotate the wheel were his bones break and the person gets dehydrated. Drowning was also a method used in the French Revolution. Jean-Baptiste Carrier put his victims into vessels with trapdoors for bottoms and to sink them in the Loire River.…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reign of terror

    • 553 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Grace Halleck 1st hour Why was the Reign of Terror not justified? The Reign of Terror was not justified because it was not what the people of France wanted, which was equality. The government was not giving rights or actions they promised either, and both sides of the fight were put in serious danger.…

    • 553 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Committee of Public safety formed to protect the newly formed republic from outside attacks and internal conflicts. Maximilien Robespierre, the leader of the Committee of Public Safety, introduced new legislation and expressed his ideals in a series of speeches. These speeches touched on the nature of public virtue and theory of revolutionary government. Robespierre differentiated a revolutionary government from a constitutional government, saying, “It has nothing in common with arbitrary rule; it is public interest that governs it and not the whims of private individuals” (Hanson 170). From this statement, it is clear that Robespierre’s revolutionary view focused on the importance of public interest instead of solely influential members who make up the first and second estates. The constitution of 1793 motivated the efforts of the committee as they worked to stabilize the economy. Individual freedoms and social equality would flourish under these principles, but Robespierre’s power went to his head. Paranoid that counterrevolutionary traitors would interfere with the government, Robespierre launched the Reign of Terror. The Terror served as an emergency form of government that was meant to scare the citizens into conforming to Robespierre’s ideals. Robespierre’s republic of virtue quickly diminished as men lost the majority of their rights. Because Robespierre executed anyone who expressed an opinion that lead him to believe they were a traitor, the citizens lacked freedom of speech, their opinions, and even their property. All progress towards individual freedom and equality the French government made since overthrowing the monarchy was essentially reversed. Filled with paranoia and fear caused by the Terror, the people wanted to eliminate Robespierre because he had grown to become almost dictator-like. Once the economy stabilized, Robespierre no longer had a purpose,…

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays