School Uniforms are a Terrible Idea
Refutation essay- “school uniforms are a terrible idea”
The essay school uniforms are a terrible idea states that. School uniforms fail to achieve the goals for which a school uniform was established suck as to save students money to, to prevent violence, and create a more organized school environment. The essay also states the uniforms restrict student’s freedom of expression. That school uniforms have led to more violence and that since no studies have yet proven that a uniform policy can solve more problems than they create. This is not necessarily true and uniform policies are not nearly as terrible as the essay would like us to believe. The essay states that the intent of school uniforms was to save students money but that instead of saving money they cost more money and that the writers brother’s uniform cost much more that any outfit from a discount store so it concludes that the uniform policy should be discarded but it is based on the assumption that just because his/her brother’s uniform cost more than regular clothing then every uniform must cost more than regular clothing. She/he commits the logical fallacy of false analogy. My school uniform only cost me around twenty dollars when a t-shirt from a store like forever21 cost me thirty-four dollar. She then claims that if every student was required to pay as much as her/his brother then many students would not be able to afford an education and concludes that uniforms are a very bad idea. But this based on the assumption that because his/her brother would not be able to afford school that many other would also not be able to afford an education which is not necessarily true. She/he commits the logical fallacy of false analogy. Many of my friends would be able to afford a uniform when their parents have high paying jobs. In her next argument she/ he call principals who put forth a uniform policy tyrannical and school boards puritanical and say that they are denying poor students constitutional rights.
The essay school uniforms are a terrible idea states that. School uniforms fail to achieve the goals for which a school uniform was established suck as to save students money to, to prevent violence, and create a more organized school environment. The essay also states the uniforms restrict student’s freedom of expression. That school uniforms have led to more violence and that since no studies have yet proven that a uniform policy can solve more problems than they create. This is not necessarily true and uniform policies are not nearly as terrible as the essay would like us to believe. The essay states that the intent of school uniforms was to save students money but that instead of saving money they cost more money and that the writers brother’s uniform cost much more that any outfit from a discount store so it concludes that the uniform policy should be discarded but it is based on the assumption that just because his/her brother’s uniform cost more than regular clothing then every uniform must cost more than regular clothing. She/he commits the logical fallacy of false analogy. My school uniform only cost me around twenty dollars when a t-shirt from a store like forever21 cost me thirty-four dollar. She then claims that if every student was required to pay as much as her/his brother then many students would not be able to afford an education and concludes that uniforms are a very bad idea. But this based on the assumption that because his/her brother would not be able to afford school that many other would also not be able to afford an education which is not necessarily true. She/he commits the logical fallacy of false analogy. Many of my friends would be able to afford a uniform when their parents have high paying jobs. In her next argument she/ he call principals who put forth a uniform policy tyrannical and school boards puritanical and say that they are denying poor students constitutional rights.