Preview

Reform Act Of 1867: The Path To Democracy In Britain

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
785 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Reform Act Of 1867: The Path To Democracy In Britain
Democracy is government by the people, for the people. The second reform act of 1867 advanced Britain on its path to democracy although there remained many undemocratic aspects in the governance of Britain.

The 1867 reform bill did many things to increase democracy in Britain. It increased the electorate by a million meaning that one in three adult males were enfranchised. The act also redistributed seats in recognition of the shift from a large rural population to an urban one.
52 seats were abolished and these seats were given to new cities such as Leeds and
Manchester and the larger counties gained MP's as all counties, regardless os size getting 2
MPs was deemed unfair.

Despite the changes which the second reform act
…show more content…
Although there was a lot of seat redistribution in the 1867 reform act with 52 borough seats being abolished, the distribution of seats still did not accurately reflect Britain's population distribution. The counties still had a lower proportion of voters to seats than the boroughs and the south was over represented.

In a democracy all votes are equal and there is one vote per person. This was not the case in
1868 due to the existence of plural voting. 'This meant that people who lived in one constituency and owned a business in another, or who had graduated from one of the universities that possessed their own parliamentary seats, were allowed extra seats'
(Goodlad).
For example Joseph Chamberlain had six votes and it is estimated that half a million people had plural votes in 1880. They were finally abolished in 1948.

Democracy means that the government of the country is carried out by the people or their elected representatives. However the House of Lords had the power to veto legislation passed in the House of Commons. This meant that a non-elected body determined the outcome

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The thirteen colonies in America began early on to develop democratic features. The democracy in colonial America was a work in progress with democratic and undemocratic features. There were undemocratic features in the way people were living. These laws were made to make this world stay at peace together.…

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    * Smith, Kieth. "On Gerrymandering and Its Effects." Web log post. Political Science at University of the Pacific. Pacificpoliticalscience.wordpress.com, 2 Nov. 2011. Web. 04 Mar. 2013. <http://pacificpoliticalscience.wordpress.com/2011/11/02/on-gerrymandering-and-its-effects/>.…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As a result of the American revolution Britain received a tremendous shock to its system with the loss of the thirteen colonies. The war revealed Britain’s limitations and this heightened dissension and escalated political antagonism towards the monarch, George III, and his ministers. At this time the main issues concerning parliament were now representation, parliamentary reform, and government retrenchment.…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In fact, that source 7 Disraeli observes that “the Conservative party can win the smaller [boroughs], of which there are many”: proves that he was considering the impact of the bill on his own party, and having drawn the conclusion that alteration to the franchise would benefit the Conservatives is naturally keen that it should pass. He is clearly aware of the less democratic aspects of the electoral system, (“the ‘working classes’ […] Depend upon [the upper classes] for employment and existence”) and recommending the bill on the grounds that it will allow the conservatives to take advantage of this fact.…

    • 544 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During Colonial America, features of democratic and undemocratic was a work in progress for democracy.…

    • 249 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    • Protest put pressure on the government to create the voting registration Act of 1965 (yes)…

    • 1595 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Reform of the electoral system finally arrived with the 1832 Reform Act, which increased the proportion of eligible voters in England and Wales to 18 per cent of the adult-male population and 12 per cent in Scotland. Although the working classes had high hopes for the Reform Act, they eventually felt betrayed as despite the new legislation, the poor ultimately remained voiceless in the way their country was run. In the years following the Reform Act, the Chartists would begin to plan their campaign to try to effect real electoral change in Britain.…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1850 Britain was extremely far from being known as a democracy. This was due to the fact that the great reform act only extended the power of the vote from wealthy landowning men in 1832 to the wealthy middle class men. This meant that the majority of the population still were unable to vote. For a country to be democratic it entails to have certain circumstances which would include the majority of the population, every adult, having the right to vote for their country. There should also be an equal amount of seats distributed. All elections that take place should be run fairly and be restricted from intimidation and influence. Every adult should also only be entitled to one vote whereas at this time some individuals who went to university could vote in their university constituency as well as when they owned a property. It should be allowed that a person from any background is able to become an MP. By 1918 many of these circumstances had been met although not all. Although improvements had been met in Britain some aspects that would make the country fully become a democracy where not in place, therefore it can be argued that Britain was not fully a democracy by 1918.…

    • 1328 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hout, Eliora van der, and Anthony J. McGann. 2009. Proportional Representation within the Limits of Liberalism Alone. British Journal of Political Science 39:735-54.…

    • 2654 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Voting was done by the people electing a president and a congress from competing political parties.…

    • 1854 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The development of parliament: In 1275 Edward I called his first Parliament. He summoned nobles and churchmen, but also issued orders (known as writs) for the election of two representatives from each county (the knights of the shire) and two from each city or town (the burgesses) to attend.They were called on primarily to listen to and approve the King's plan for a new tax. Over the following years it became an accepted rule that the representatives of those who were going to be most affected by taxation had to give their consent to it in Parliament.…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    By "a democracy" we mean that there should be several certain features present. These features consist of universal adult suffrage, equal constituencies, every adult being able to stand as a candidate, a secret ballot, regular elections, a choice of political parties and freedom of speech/press. There is a debate over when exactly Britain actually became a representative liberal democracy. This essay will show that by 1914 Britain was not yet fully a democracy, but well on its way.…

    • 891 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since most residents of rural America had to travel a significant distance to the county seat in…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1886 Gladstone had proposed a moderate reform bill, it would’ve enfranchised an additional 400,000 men. However it was fiercely opposed by the government. Disraeli in particular feared that extending the franchise challenged the authority of his aristocracy. However, when the conservatives returned to office later in the year, Disraeli decided to press for reform. In fact the reform was even more radical than the first. There are a few reasons to why Disraeli might have done this. Pressure for reform was growing and the liberal bill had heightened expectations even further. If some reform was a possible, it would be better if the conservatives could claim responsibility, therefore possibly winning electoral support of the workers. According to this view Disraeli’s main motive was to “dish the Whigs”. This meant that he opportunistically opposed the 1886 Bill but then introduced a similar measure. This factor was a significant contribution to why the reform bill was passed. As the Tory view explains, reform occurred mainly as a result of competition between the parties; both wanted to determine the terms of any reform, and both wanted to secure the future support of the workers. As much as many mainstream liberals wanted further economic and social reforms, they assumed that once they had enfranchised workers, urban workers in particular, they would probably vote liberal.…

    • 985 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    each election. In 1999 the Parliament was elected by less than 50% of the voters for the first time,…

    • 2816 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays