Preview

reflection in archaeology

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
609 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
reflection in archaeology
Hominid and hominin – what’s the difference?
The terms ‘hominid’ and ‘hominin’ are frequently used in human evolution.
New definitions
The most commonly used recent definitions are:
Hominid – the group consisting of all modern and extinct Great Apes (that is, modern humans, chimpanzees, gorillas and orang-utans plus all their immediate ancestors).
Hominin – the group consisting of modern humans, extinct human species and all our immediate ancestors (including members of the genera Homo, Australopithecus, Paranthropus and Ardipithecus).
Previous definitions
Current use of the term ‘hominid’ can be confusing because the definition of this word has changed over time.
The term ‘hominid’ used to have the same meaning that ‘hominin’ now has. It was therefore a very useful term to designate the line leading to modern humans and was used when referring to various members of our human evolutionary tree.
‘Hominid’ has now been assigned a broader meaning and now refers to all Great Apes and their ancestors. This new terminology is being used in many scientific journals already, and it is only a matter of time (but possibly many years) before everyone catches up to using the new term.
The problem for students and teachers is that a lot of texts still use the old system and many internet sites also haven't caught up, even those of many reputable scientific establishments. So students/teachers will need to be aware that 'hominids' can mean two different things depending on how up-to-date a reference is with regard to incorporating these taxonomy/classification changes.
Why have these changes occurred?
‘Hominid’ and ‘hominin’ are derived from names used in the scientific classification of apes (including humans). By international convention, certain word endings are used for specific taxons or levels within this classification. For example, ‘family’ names always end in ‘-idae’ (eg Hominidae), ‘subfamily’ names end in ‘inae’ (eg Homininae) and ‘tribe’ (1) names end

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Lb1 Research Paper

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In 2004 a group of scientists found the partial skeleton of a new human species we had never seen before. Researchers called the remains LB1, also nicknamed the hobbit due to its small size. It was first believed that this new species, Homo floresiensis, was a descendent of Homo erectus that had simply dwarfed over time due to limited access to resources. However, newer studies have highlighted some of the more primitive characteristics of LB1, which lead scientists to believe that the hobbits branched off from the human family tree much earlier than previously thought.…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    | * A creature belonging to the family Hominidae, which includes human and humanlike species. * Australopithecus genus evolved in eastern Africa…

    • 3704 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    ANT 105 Notes

    • 614 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The suborder humans belong to. Includes Ceboidae (New World Monkeys); Cercopithoidea (Old World Monkeys) and Hominoidae (Apes and Humans).…

    • 614 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Study Guide: Hybrid Primates

    • 4125 Words
    • 17 Pages

    The original taxonomy had humans separated form apes, but if you look at the genetic information, the orangutan is more genetically different to apes than humans. A reclassification of the great apes has been proposed. Traditionally, there was pongidae and hominidae (where apes and humans are classified separately). The proposed change is that all of the great apes become classified into hominidae, and then separate them out at different subfamilies and tribes.…

    • 4125 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Instructor: Dr. Joyce Parga; Email: j.parga@utoronto.ca Office hours: Tuesdays & Thursdays 3-4 pm (or by appointment); Office: MW 382 Lecture meeting times and location: Tuesdays 1-3 pm in SW 319 Tutorials (labs): 5 Tuesdays across the semester during your 1-hr tutorial section in MW 329 Tutorial TA: Dejana Nikitovic; Email: dejana.nikitovic@mail.utoronto.ca; Office: MW 343 (Note: Tutorials begin in Week 3 on Tuesday May 21. See Tutorial Schedule at end of syllabus.) Course Description: This course will provide a basic introduction to Evolutionary Anthropology and Archaeology, aimed at students with no background in either field. Prerequisites: None Exclusions: ANT100Y, ANT101H Required Readings: All chapters listed below in the lecture schedule refer to the following course textbook, which is available for purchase from the UTSC bookstore: Lewis, B., Jurmain, R., and Kilgore, L., 2012. Understanding Humans: Introduction to Physical Anthropology and Archaeology, 11th edition. Belmont CA: Wadsworth. You can also purchase the text from the publisher as an e-book. Go to: http://www.nelsonbrain.com/shop/isbn/9781111831776 (On Blackboard, there is a PowerPoint file provided by the publisher about buying the e-book – look under “Course Materials”.) Lecture schedule: Following is a planned list of topics to be covered in lecture; note that topics are subject to change and all topics listed may not be covered, but you are responsible for doing all of the readings. Date 7 May 14 May 21 May Lecture Topic Course Intro /What is Anthropology/Evolution Genetics/Processes of Evolution Non-Human Primates/Primate Behaviour…

    • 1375 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Summary Response In the article “Of Primates and Personhood” written by Ed Yong, demonstrates major developments between primatologist, biologists, and ethicists around the world. These major developments are a pending spanish law that would grant unprecedented protection toward great apes; Also, a recent extension to a swiss law that protects the dignity of organisms, and to redefine the meaning of human rights, and indeed whether such rights are the exclusive domain of humans. Furthermore, the Great Ape Project (GAP) has been established (1993). Not everyone had been comfortable with the GAP’s project, says Yong;…

    • 207 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    * Hominins: Modern humans and all extinct species more closely related to humans than chimps and bonobos…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The issue of the status of Neanderthal man has been hotly contested in the anthropology world. It is the matter of whether Homo Sapiens are the decedents of Neanderthals or whether they are cousins with a common ancestor. If Neanderthals are considered to be a proper descendent to Homo Sapiens, then they can be rightfully classified as Homo Sapiens Neanderthal. If they are truly a separate species, then they should be classified as Homo Neanderthal.…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Groups * Technical term > classification system (groups/a people/stock) * 18th Century * Evaluation/Judgment * Race > groups “strange to the European eye” * Race > the “other” -> groups “other than the European” * 19th Century a) Biology/Genetics * Socio-biology enters the picture * Thinking scientifically about race * Biological determinism b) Hierarchy * Natural Hierarchy of human races c) Race Scientists * Ex#1.…

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since humans and other primates share a variety of characteristics, other primates provide important observations about early humans. Homologies between hominids and other primates enhance to behavior because the physiological and cognitive formations that manage to control human demeanor are likely related to those of other primates than to members of other taxonomic groups. The reality of this broad collection of homologous traits, the commodity of the average evolutionary history of the primates, means that nonhuman primates give beneficial examples for understanding the evolutionary ancestry of hominid morphology and for resolving the basis of human nature.…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This article is about the biological taxonomy term. For the sociological concept, see Social interpretations of race. For the anthropological term, see Race (classification of humans).…

    • 259 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Homo Sapiens sapiens, a scientific term given to human species. They are called so because they are the only surviving species of genus Homo. Humans are also considered as a most intelligent and social species, who tend to live within their society and make their society a better place to live. By their physical and mental power they dominate almost every other species on the planet earth. In order to be dominant,they start killing other species and push most of them to extinction and left many in endanger. As they get tired of fighting with other species, they started to fighting within their people’s to get the highest rank and power in their own community. By doing so, they totally forgot about the real things that that they have with them…

    • 1724 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Biological Race Issues

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Anthropology: The Human Challenge defines race as “the taxonomic category of a subspecies that is not applicable to humans because the division of humans into discrete types does not represent the true nature of human biological variation. In some societies race is an important social category.” (Haviland, Prins, Walrath, McBride, 2014). Although the biological race concept does not pertain to human disparities, race remains a significant cultural and social issue.…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animals. It is a word that is often associated with savagery, wildness, and bestial manners. Scientifically speaking, humans are a part of the Kingdom Animalia; our biological processes are strikingly similar to the rest of the Kingdom. However, nobody really grows up believing they are an animal. People tend to classify themselves as a whole new species, isolating themselves from their biological kingdom and depicting themselves as people, not animals. But how different are we from animals? Throughout time, the evolutionary chasm between humans and animals has grown farther apart, but they originate from the same ancestors - biologically speaking. Ultimately, it seems the distinctions between…

    • 1335 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Human Race Analysis

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages

    What is a race? For many people, a race is defined as the color of your skin, but in fact, this term has a variety of meanings. Some of these come up often in everyday life, as we discuss “the human race.” Other definitions used on government forms, as when Americans record which race they belong to for the U.S. Census. Some meanings are far more technical when for example a “biologist talks about different races of a particular species of plant or animal” (MacEachern 34). The context in which the word race used has an array of definitions, but in the day to day life, we continue to distort the differences between these meanings. One of the most vital tasks of an anthropologist is to examine the biological and cultural variability that is present…

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays