NEO-COLONIALISM AND NATIONALISM
Neo-colonialism is a geopolitical practice to influence a country using capitalism, global globalization and cultural imperialism. This practice was predominant as early as 1946 in the Philippines wherein the United States established a neo-colony in the country. It immensely affected the Philippine lifestyle, culture and government. This geopolitical practice unravelled a lot of issues concerning Philippine Independence. Philippine independence was questioned. It was contended that the Philippines should run for and by itself without the interference of the United States. It seemed like Philippines is independent legally but not politically. The colonial past reflects to the Philippines today. Due to the long history of neo-colonialism of United States in the Philippines, it is still evident today. There are several aspects wherein the neo-colonial relationship penetrated the Philippines. It was because of this that the government learned the art of graft and corruption controlled by an oligarch. Nationalism was greatly affected due to neo-colonialism which produced two kinds of nationalistic response: the elitists’ response and the masses’ reaction. These are contradicting guilds; that often result to disputes between them. The elitists’ position as one of the ruling class, usually favour the government because of their own benefit. While on the other hand, the masses protests with how the government is controlled because they are deprived with proper compensation. All in all, neo-colonialism was a great influence to the government that we have today. It is the root cause of the rampant corrupt political practices in the government nowadays. It had been a governmental heirloom of the politicians of the past until now. If only the Filipinos know how to resist and unite in one cause, the colonial past will soon fade, and the Philippines will not only be legally free but the country will be reaching political and spiritual independence once and for all. The independence we all have been waiting for; that one big leap to an economic progress—for a better Philippines for the next generations to live in.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
In the end, the annexation of the Philipines caused unhappiness in the both the Philipines and in the United States. Filipinos wanted idependence and Anti-Imperialist didn't want to take this from them. The United States should not have annexed…
- 366 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The Spanish have been a monarchy enforcing their laws and customs upon their colonies since the fifteenth century, so the United States should come to the aid of the filipino people by assisting in setting up a democratic government. Recently, America assisted in liberated the island nation of Cuba from spanish rule. The Cubans were tired of the unfair taxation inforced by the Spanish, as well as having no say in the way they are governed. If the Cubans felt this way about the Spanish, the Filipino people have similar feelings about the Spanish rule. The Spanish monarchy is a in complete control of the Philippines and as the proponent of democracy it is the American duty to share this wonderful political gift with nations that are deprived of their natural right to choose how their lands are governed. Recently, the United States government has been an ambassador of democracy in the the Dominican Republic. This country attempted to bring itself out of a tyrannical government on their own, but their effort was futile. The United States took over the Dominican’s government for a short period of time to help assist them in establishing a democracy. The United States has the ability to bring the most modern and socially responsible form of government to…
- 651 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The first reason why the United States was right to annex the Philippines is because the Filipinos are not capable of governing themselves. William McKinley makes an excellent point, “That we could not leave them [Philippines] to themselves- they were unfit for self-governing- and they would soon have anarchy and misrule…” (Document C). The Philippines would have messed up if they would govern themselves. Albert J. Beveridge says, “The rule that all just government applies only to those who are capable of self-government,” (Document B). The Filipinos need the United States to help govern them. Both those men were right, the Filipinos were not ready.…
- 655 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
America is a great security for them and have advanced them up to the standards of the rest of the world through the annexation. The Philippine islands have finally gotten what they have wanted for centuries, independence. The Filipinos have lost some roots, but now have the choice to act as they feel and to try and reconnect if they would desire. America brought to them many wonderful factors such as free public education, a sense of freedom in religion, especially for those non Roman Catholic, and a connection with a powerful country to protect them if need be. Smith’s theory applies fairly well for the situation even with such differences in the time of the events.…
- 1216 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Reasons by the United States to take over the Philippines were not very good ones. First…
- 672 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
At the time the decision to annex the Philippines was made, there were other countries waiting and ready to attack and takeover the control that Spain had lost to the Americans. American rule allowed human rights, freedoms and quality of life that would not have been possible had America walked away and allowed the fledgling country try and rule itself. Germany, England, Japan and even Spain would have jumped at the opportunity to take over control of the Philippines and its many resources. Many important and profitable trade routes utilized the Philippines as a gateway to trade their goods and wares. Although it was profitable for the Americans to control this area and have access to the trade routes and resources, they were helping prepare the Filipinos to one day self rule and govern themselves as a free and independent country. Definitely not an opportunity they would…
- 921 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
+ Imperialists see taking possession of Philippines as a right and good thing to do. One the other hand, anti-imperialists believe that Philippines should have their own government.…
- 520 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Many problems were created because of imperialism. Some of those problems were political problems. Henry Cabot Lodge said that the Philippines "have never known liberty"(Doc.6). Many people such as politicians thought that some territories were easily influenced by the concept of imperialism because of many journalists. Henry Lodge's statement is not true because the invasion of our country is the exact opposite of letting liberty into our country. The…
- 535 Words
- 3 Pages
Better Essays -
Expansion into the Philippines meant different things to different leaders. Some leaders believed in expansion for economic reasons while others believed in spreading American idealism. Finally, during a time when America had gained political and economic strength, Spain was oppressing their people and American leaders argued that the U.S. needed to provide humanitarian aid. In this essay, I will exam three instances of motives used to justify expansion into the Philippines.…
- 322 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Imperialism is the total domination of the political, economic, or cultural aspects or a nation. Imperial colonization has been occurring sense the beginning of time. In the political aspect the motives were based on a nation's desire to gain power, to compete with other European countries, to expand territory, to exercise military force, to gain prestige by winning colonies, and to boost national pride and…
- 622 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
There are many different forms of government that exists in the world and one of those is Federal form of government. Federal states are political body described by combination of partially self-governing states or provinces united by a central (federal) government. Federal form of government is a form of government in which sovereign power is formally divided usually by means of a constitution between a central authority and a number of constituent regions (states, colonies, or provinces) so that each region retains some management of its internal affairs. A federal form of government is also a government system in which power is distributed between numerous regional state/provinces governments and a central, national government in rough balance, although the central government may be stronger or weaker, overall, than the regional governments. Central government-within this structure are the government ministries and departments and agencies to which the ministers of government are assigned. Central government also works alongside agencies to help with tax collection.…
- 735 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Graham, J; Bradshaw, C, and Trew, J. (2010). Cultural considerations for social service agencies working with Muslim clients. Social Work. 55(4). pp. 337-346.…
- 306 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
I was surprised when the United States had control over the Philippines afterward. There was no other country that could have the better understanding the Philippines situation than the U.S. that was considering the United States also had fought for their survival from Great Britain. The Philippines had the perfect situation to promote democracy and to provide the example for other nations and colonies. American troops had burn villages, and abused the civilians. I think if I was living during the Philippine war I would’ve felt like I was a small person. Andrew Carnegie was the leader of the expansionist. He said “You seem to have about finished your work of civilizing the Filipinos.” It was about eight thousands of them who completely civilized.…
- 535 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In the late 1800s, the U.S. became an imperialist power, competing to extend their influence throughout the world. The US had a few reasons for becoming an imperialist country. Their desire for economic growth, military expansion, and spreading their values and ideas compelled them to conquer other countries. But not all Americans believed that America should be imperialist. Those who disagreed with the pro-expansionist beliefs were afraid of conflict with other countries, the amount it would cost, and didn’t want to contradict the principles that the United States held. The Philippines is just one example of U.S. annexation. In 1899, the U.S. defeated Spain in the Spanish-American war and acquired Spain’s colonies, which included the Philippines. The U.S. decided to annex the Philippines and sent 70,000 troops to put down a Philippine revolt. The Americans were very divided on the topic of whether or not the U.S. was justified in intervening in the Philippines. Although the U.S. made some positive contributions to Philippine society, their harsh treatment of the Filipinos contradicted its ideals. Therefore, the intervention was not justified.…
- 555 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
To those in government, the lifting of military rule heralded a change. To their perceptions, the Philippines became a new nation and this; former President Marcos called “The New Republic of the Philippines.”…
- 2411 Words
- 10 Pages
Good Essays