Preview

Reeves vs Ch Robinson

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
836 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Reeves vs Ch Robinson
Part I
Reeves v C.H. Robinson Worldwide
2008 525 F.3d 1139
(11th Cir.)

Facts of the case: Ingrid Reeves, a Transportation Sales Representative files an appeal on the summary judgment in favor if C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. on her hostile work environment sexual harassment claims. Reeves was the only female TSR in the C.H. Robinson Birmingham, Alabama branch office. She worked in a workstation pod cubicle and claims that sexually offensive language permeated the air in her pod daily from the Summer of 2001 to the Spring of 2004. In addition to sexually explicit radio programming she was on one occasion exposed to pornographic images. This behavior continued even after several complaints to her co-workers and supervisors.

Issues to be Discussed/Decided by the court: The court has to determine whether daily exposer to language and radio programming that are particularly offensive to women but not directly targeted at the plaintiff are sufficient to satisfy the “based on” and “severe or pervasive” elements of a hostile work claim. Part II
Holding(s): The grounds for a Title VII sexual harassment claim can be either a tangible employment action or the creation of a hostile work environment caused by sexual harassment that is severe or persuasive enough to affect the terms and conditions of work. In order to recover under the hostile work environment theory an employee must show (1) that she belongs to the protected group, (2) she has been subject to unwelcomed sexual harassment, (3)the harassment was based on membership in the protected group, (4) harassment was sufficiently severe or persuasive enough to alter the terms and conditions of employment and create an abusive work environment, and (5) basis for holding the employer liable exists The only element s at issue are the “based on” and “severe and pervasive” elements The issue of “based on” in order to be satisfied the plaintiff must show that similarly situated members of the opposite sex were



Cited: Walsh, David J. Employment Law for Human Resource Practice. Third Edition. http://www.openmarket.org/2009/06/10/eleventh-circuit-grants-rehearing-in-reeves-v-ch-robinson-worldwide-which-gutted-statutory-limits-on-sexual-harassment-claims/l http://www.leagle.com/xmlResult.aspx?xmldoc=20081664525F3d1139_11548.xml&docbase=CSLWAR3-2007-CURR

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The legal case of Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc. is a sex discrimination case under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. “Title VII specifically forbids any employer to … discriminate with respect to compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment in any way that would deprive any individual of employment opportunity due to race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.” (Twomey, 2013, p. 397). In this case, Oncale claimed that he was being discriminated against in his workplace because of his sex. In reading the case online, Oncale was “was forcibly subjected to sex-related, humiliating actions against him … in the presence of the rest…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The facts in the case of Thompson V North American Stainless, LP 562 U.S._ (2011) are fairly straightforward. The petitioner in this case, Eric Thompson, was seemingly fired from his job at North American Stainless (NAS) because his fiancée, Miriam Regalado filed a sexual discrimination charge with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). His suit was filed under Title VII claiming that his dismissal was retaliation for his fiancée’s charge. (Pagnattaro, Cahoy, Magid, Reed, & Shedd, n.d.)…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Title VII of the Civil Rights protects man and women. It means that woman and men are protected against any sort of sexual harassment.…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In trial the District Court found that the supervisors' behavior was discriminatory harassment sufficiently serious to alter the conditions of her employment and constitute an abusive working environment. The Court further held the City liable because the city failed to properly disseminate the sexual harassment policy to all employees and properly enforce this policy. Also, the supervisors represented the City and city management failed to provide any reviews over this section but allowed the supervisors "unchecked authority". The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the decision, finding that the supervisors were harassing Beth Ann outside the scope of their employment, that they were not aided in their actions by the agency relationship, and that the City had no constructive knowledge of the harassment by virtue of its pervasiveness or her immediate supervisor's actual…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mgmt 520 Week 5 Assignment

    • 1552 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Based on the given facts, she was the subject of jokes in her work place as she was being picked on based on her gender. Since she was the only woman in her department, the male employees subject her to cruel and mean jokes on several occasion when other workers placed a sign on a truck that stated "Hardhat Required/Bra Optional”. This is clearly an illustration that she is working in a hostile environment since the repeated jokes made on her gender has created an intimidating place of work. The case of Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson is applicable to Pollard where the Supreme Court ruled that hostile work environment sex discrimination is an actionable wrong under Title VII. The fact that the Vice President of the bank made sexual advances against complainant created a hostile work environment and is a form of a sexual harassment covered by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The severe and pervasive conduct of the vice president who repeated sexually abused on the victim in exchange for sexual favors at the office qualify the acts as punishable under Title VII. Here, the acts of the Teddy’s workers against Pollard constitute Hostile Work Environment (HWE) sexual harassment through the vulgar sexual jokes and…

    • 1552 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sosebee filed her suit to be considered sexual harassment under Title VII. According to the EEOC, sexual harassment is a form of harassment to a person because of that person’s sex, unwelcome sexual advances or offensive remarks about a person’s sex. Sosebee filed under Title VII because she felt as though the reasons for punishments were because of her sex.…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Federal and state governments have enacted laws to protect against discrimination and sexual harassment in the work place yet employers continue to discriminate and violate employee 's right to work in a non-hostile environment. We have chosen Jenson v. Eveleth Taconite Company to examine class action status, discrimination and sexual harassment in the work place. This was the case first sexual harassment lawsuit to receive class action certification in 1988 defining the class “to include: all women who have applied for, or have been employed, in hourly positions...at any time since December 30, 1983” (U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit, 1997).…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title VII, forbids “an employer to … discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual’s … sex.” Civil Rights Act, 1964. In Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson, the court held that “a plaintiff may establish a violation of Title VII by proving that discrimination based on sex has created a hostile or abusive work environment.” Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson (US 1986). A hostile work environment is created when the environment at work creates anxiety so severe as to result in an alteration of the terms and conditions of employment. Hailey Course Pack, p. 140. The burden to prove such an environment was created rests on the plaintiff. The plaintiff must prove that they belong to a protected class; were subject to unwelcomed harassment; the harassment is based on sex, meaning it is not happening to members of the opposite sex; and the harassment alters the conditions of employment. Hailey Course Pack, p. 140. In this case, the court will evaluate whether Black has sufficient evidence to prove her claim of a hostile work environment.…

    • 1852 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    | Dear Mr. Moore, After reviewing this case, I can state that Teddy’s Supplies is definitely liable for the workplace and sexual harassment against Virginia Pollard. According to the facts, it’s indicated that Ms. Pollard (plaintiff) was placed in a ‘hostile’ environment and Mr. Steve King was her supervisor. Although it is not illegal for 1 woman to work with a group of men, it should be carefully determined by the employer if the environment is suitable for males and females to work together. In this case, it was not a good idea for 1 woman to work with male associates. • Workplace environment can by justified by 7 ways: race, gender, national origin, religious, color, age and disability. In this case, Pollard was constantly being harassed by her male colleagues. They played pranks on her by locking her drawers shut, filling the guard shack with trash, locking her out of the guard shack and therefore she was not able to perform her job duty since she was responsible for watching warehouse inventory. Also, Ms. Pollard was put into unnecessary risk of harm when a coworker backed a forklift up to the guard shack and it backfire into her ear. Ms. Pollard could have sustained injuries if the forklift had hit her because it weighted 3 tons and it could have easily injured her eardrums because it is very loud.…

    • 2218 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Williamson V Houston

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The IAD investigation determined that there was no basis for Williamson’s allegations. Williamson sued the City of Houston under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act for hostile work environment sexual harassment and for retaliation against her for reporting the harassment. In a District Court, a jury found the city liable for both sexual harassment and for retaliation. Williamson was awarded back pay and compensatory damages, as well as court costs and attorney’s fees. On appeal to the Fifth Circuit, U.S. Court of Appeals, the City of Houston challenged the judgment on the grounds that it did not have notice of the harassment until April 1992 and that her notification to her supervisor should not have constituted notice to the city. The District Court’s ruling was affirmed by the Appeals Court. 3. Main Issue: Can a supervisor’s knowledge of harassing behavior be imputed to the city to show that the city knew, or should have known, of the harassing behavior and can therefore be held liable for failing to stop the behavior? 4. Court Deciding: United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. 5. Decision: Summary judgment affirming the decision of the District…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Brief Meritor Sav

    • 356 Words
    • 2 Pages

    After being terminated a female bank employee filed an action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.S. §2000e et seq., claiming that she had been sexually harassed by her male supervisor. The US Supreme Court ruled that if the actions of the supervisor were unwelcome, than the respondent had a claim for sexual harassment on the basis of a hostile work environment, even if the sexual acts were voluntary.…

    • 356 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Title Vii Case

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Title VII states that it is an unlawful practice for an employer to fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual’s race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. Mary has now vowed to not hire ANY while males in her department after Paul made a backhand comment about why they downsized 25% of their white male workforce in order to be more HR compliant. Paul now feels that that was a wrong decision and that they should hire more white males. Also, Mary is guilty…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Roberts, B. S., & Mann, R. A. (n.d.). Sexual Harassment in the Workplace: A Primer. Retrieved July 2013, from http://www3.uakron.edu/lawrev/robert1.html…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    I have been a victim of sexual harassment in the workplace. I had experienced degrading comments and physical actions from a male supervisor. After enduring the disrespect and humiliation I protected myself and took action. I did not want to feel like I did not have a voice, let alone a man make me disrespected and inferior to him. I ultimately did not receive the results I wanted; because he was a superior in the company they felt it was just a miscommunication, so nothing was done. I remained at the company regardless of the outcome. In the end I felt empowered that I am a woman, I was able to be strong and stand for what I thought was right for me and for other women in the company. “Under evolving legal standards, sexual harassment is recognized as any unwanted and unwelcome sexual advances that interfere with a person’s ability to perform a job and enjoy the benefits of a job.” (Schaefer, R. T. (2012) “Despite these rulings, it is very difficult legally and emotionally for a person to bring forward a case of sexual harassment (Domino, 1995, Roscigno and Schimdt, 2007). (Schaefer, R. T. (2012)…

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    law class

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. Similarly, Courts of Appeals in sexual harassment cases have properly drawn on standards developed in cases involving racial harassment. See, e.g., Carrero v. New York City Housing Auth., 890 F.2d 569, 577 (CA2 1989) (citing Lopez v. S. B. Thomas, Inc., 831 F.2d 1184, 1189 (CA2 1987), a case of racial harassment, for the proposition that incidents of environmental sexual harassment “must be more than episodic; they must be sufficiently continuous and concerted in order to be deemed pervasive”). Although racial and sexual harassment will often take different forms, and standards my not be entirely interchangeable, we think there is good sense in seeking generally to harmonize the standards of what amounts to actionable harassment.…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays