Preview

Recommendations Financial Analysis

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
169 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Recommendations Financial Analysis
Recommendations

In reference to ratios it is concluded that the net profits of both companies, PepsiCo and Coca-Cola, decreased in amount from 2004 to 2005.
These decreases were a direct result of operations expenses shared by each company.
The operating expenses of both companies were higher in 2005 than in the previous year.
For both PepsiCo and Coca-Cola to boost profitability these corporations should focus on reducing operating costs.
PepsiCo experienced a slight increase in current assets from the years in question, but a profound increase in its liabilities.
Furthermore, a 5.8% increase in liabilities housed only a 2% increase of assets.
I recommend that PepsiCo make all efforts to reduce liabilities and avoid taking on any new liabilities while keeping a focus on assets its priority.
In contrast, Coke had a decrease of 4.3% in assets but decreased liabilities as well by 4.9%.
I recommend that Coke continue to reduce liabilities especially when assets are decreasing, but to make valiant efforts to increase net profits which will increase assets as a result.
(Weygandt, Kimmel, & Kieso, 2008)

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    • Examine PepsiCo, Inc.’s Consolidated Balance Sheet on p. A6 in Appendix A of Financial Accounting, especially its Current Assets, Current Liabilities, and Total Assets for years 2005 and 2004.…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cocacola Analysis

    • 1314 Words
    • 5 Pages

    An eyeball assessment of the changes in Coke’s financial statements between 1996 and 2010 show that mainly all accounts are up. The total assets are up from 1996 to 2010 with an increase from $16,161 to $72,921. Also current assets increased 3.6% from 1996 to 2010 with total non-current assets increasing 5%. Revenue nearly doubled from 1996 having only $18,546 to increasing in 2010 to $35,119. The total current liabilities increased over the years from $7,406 to $18,508. The total long term liabilities also show an increase from 1996 having $2,599 to $23,410 in 2010. Also the shareholders equity increased greatly over the years from $6,156 to a total of $31,003 in 2010.…

    • 1314 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Xacc280 Financial Analysis

    • 1828 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Investors and potential investors in these companies will look at and consider a multitude of information before deciding which of these two companies would be a better investment. For instance, most investors will look at each company’s current assets and liabilities amounts. In 2004, Coca-Cola had more than 12 million dollars in current assets, while PepsiCo showed only 8.6 million dollars in their current assets. In 2005, Coca-Cola faced a decrease while PepsiCo had an increase in current assets. PepsiCo recorded 10.4 million dollars in current assets, while Coca-Cola dropped to 10.2 million dollars. Their current liabilities faced similar comparisons. In 2004, Coca-Cola had 11.1 million dollars in current liabilities, and then dropped that number to 9.8 million dollars in 2005. This…

    • 1828 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The first analysis that will help us understand more about these two companies is the Vertical analysis. According to the textbook “ Vertical analysis evaluates financial statement data by expressing each item in a financial statement as a percent of a base amount”(Weygandt and Kimmel 2008 p.699). When you want to complete a vertical analysis you will take the base amount of an item on the financial statement and take an item that makes up part of that item and divide them to find the percentage of the item it is. The first vertical analysis I will perform will calculate what percent of the company’s current assets make up their total assets in both 2004 and 2005 for both companies. The current assets in 2004 for the Pepsi company had $8,639 in…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Review the annual reports for PepsiCo, Inc. and The Coca-Cola Company in Appendixes A B of Financial Accounting . Selecteither PepsiCo, Inc. or The Coca-Cola Company. In your estimation, the company you chose may be financially healthier or weaker.…

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Coca-cola total current assets were 39% and 34.83% in 2004 and 2005. Liquidity of PepsiCo decreased in 2005 and The Coca-cola increased in 2005. The assets of Coca-cola were 62% and 65.17% in 2004 and 2005. The current liabilities of PepsiCo were $6,753.00 and $9,406.00 in 2004 and 2005. The total assets were 24% and 29.65%. The total assets for Coca-cola were 35% and 33.43%. The liabilities of PepsiCo increased while the current debt of Coca-cola decreased. For both companies the total liabilities in 2005 were 55.08% and the total assets were 44.02%. The equity of PepsiCo was 48% of assets in 2004 and assets was 44.92% in 2005. In 2005 PepsiCo shareholder reduces the inventory. In 2005 the shares were 55.59% of assets for Coca-cola but in 2004 it showed shares there were only 51%. The shares for Coca-cola have been more than…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    The income statement of PepsiCo’s COS to sales percentage slightly rose from 43.31% in year 2004. Coca-Cola’s five-year average COS to sales percentage was only 35.26%, much lower than PepsiCo. Coca Cola was able to achieve a higher gross profit margin with lower COS to sales percentage. PepsiCo is the consequence of its tougher pricing…

    • 1756 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    The SEQUEY HORN CASE

    • 1305 Words
    • 6 Pages

    of the company’s lost profits was due to the price decreases and how much was related to other…

    • 1305 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Upon review of the company’s assets, it is apparent that there have been significant changes between 2003 and 2004. Although there was an $80 million dollar increase in inventories and a $217 million dollar increase in net receivables, there were significant decreases in other current assets and the assets from discontinued operations, which took a sizeable bite out of the overall current assets. While they did increase their property, plant and equipment assets, they still suffered a decrease in total assets of $109,000.…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Xacc 280 Final: Coke/Pepsi

    • 1839 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The significance of the trend analyses on net sales and net income is that PepsiCo has been steadily increasing its sales over the past 5 years (for a total increase of $9 billion), since 2001. Clearly, they must have sound marketing and advertising strategies, in order to not just maintain their sales figures, but to maintain a growing increase each year. Up until 2005, they were performing equally admirably at increasing their net income as well. While their net income for 2005 is still an impressive 69.9% higher than in 2001, they went from 3 years of massive increases, to a slight decrease. Since the sales figures increased from 2004-2005, it’s not a question of having a “sales slump”. This means they must have increased expenses dramatically during 2005. We know this because net income is tabulated from the income statement, which consists of revenues and expenses. Logically, if sales have continued to increase, yet net income has fallen slightly, then there must have been a substantial…

    • 1839 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    By analyzing all the above it shows that all though the company had a increase in sales however it could not maintain a similar trend in growth of net income, one assumption being the rise in expenses due to acquisition of new company lachmere.…

    • 830 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cola War

    • 9264 Words
    • 38 Pages

    For over a century, carbonated drink was introduced to mankind. Two major contenders in the industry stand Coca-Cola and PepsiCo. The two soar in the industry as they compete with each other. There were amazing monopolistic behaviors found in their doings. Have you ever wondered why such drink without any redeeming health benefits, but rather sublimely known as one of the causes to sugar and fat related diseases, can be so profitable? By setting the health benefits aside, have you ever wondered why such drinks are so popular yet a lot of competitors are unable to imitate and stand up to beat them? The secret lies…

    • 9264 Words
    • 38 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    MGT330 Final Paper

    • 2291 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Coca-Cola is one of the world’s biggest and most well-known beverage brands. During its heydays when the company was led by CEO Goizueta, Coca-Cola’s stock was on a steady rise. As late as the 1990s, Coca-Cola Co. was one of the most respected companies in America, a master of brand-building and management in the dawning global era (Carvens & Piercy, 2009). Over the last couple of years, however, Coca-Cola’s stocks have been falling and profits have been decreasing from quarter to quarter.…

    • 2291 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Financial Data Analysis

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Between the years 2009 and 2008 there were multiple financial changes to the Patton – Fuller Community Hospital. Using a combination of the balance sheet, statement of revenue and expenses, and also the 2009 hospital’s annual report we are able to see how the years differ in a financial situation. This paper will explain the differences in the finances that had the largest impact on the company as a whole.…

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Compute the following liquidity ratios for 2004 for Coca-Cola and for PepsiCo and comment on the relative liquidity of the two competitors.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays