The relationship between the two main characters of Nora and Helmer in "A Dolls House" are established through the diologue and stage directions which take place in Act One. The relationship between the characters is quite simplistic, derived from the 1870s time period in which it is set. Helmer, the husband is the head of the household and is the most important in the family status, he controls the families lifestyle according to his own views. This is depicted through Helmer's actions and diologue towards Nora.Nora has respect for her husband and "goes cautiously to her husbands door and listens" rather than disturb him to find out if he his home. She also listens to his advice and tries to include him in her everyday chores "Come see what vie bought". Helmer treats her as a child calling her "scatter brain" and "my lost squirrel" giving the impression of ownership, and that she is in 'his' household for his enjoyment. Throughout the scene Helmer continues to use pet names such as "feather brain" and "sulking squirrel" which undermine Nora's authority in their relationship and emphasis his power over her. When Nora arrives home from shopping in town Helmer asks "has featherbrain been out wasting money again", making Nora appear as a foolish girl who has no knowledge of money and that she spends it unknowingly, which shows Hemler's perception of her. Helmer's controlling relationship is also shown through their discussion of money early on in Act 1. Although both have conflicting ideas on spending money at christmas time, Nora eventually gives in to his opinion "very well if you say so". This emphasizes how she adapts to suit his point of view even though she disagrees with the idea herself. She obeys and changes her own opinions to match Helmer's showing that she has no way to stand up to defend her own beliefs in the relationship, meaning that her own views are forgotten and ignored. Helmer believes he is superior and that he must "protect her" as she is so delicate and unexperienced that he must decide all of the aspects of her life without consulting her, he appears to dictate his opinions to her "no debts, no borrowing", his views soon become the reality and laws of the household as Nora replies to him that she "would never do anything you didn't like" . Helmer's protective and controlling nature lead to his ideas being imposed on Nora through their relationship despite her beliefs, leaving no room for confliction. Which causes Noras' deception from Helmer, rather than telling him the truth which he will not accept, she decides to hide information from him. This means that although they are married, their relationship is not very deep and meaningful, since Helmer doesn't consult the details of their lifestyle with Nora, which means she cannot express her ideas and show her traits through their lifestyle and therefore she has no knowledge of law or the world around her. This is highlighted when Helmer asks Nora what she wants as a present, rather than giving her a surprise. Showing that he has no knowledge of her interests as their duties to the family are completely separate. However Helmer seems to be infatuated by her in the play as he "follows her" around the kitchen and talks to her, showing that he is in love with her. Helmer depicts her as a lover and yet he is unable to consult with her the issues of their married life, leaving her no concerns and no knowledge of law or the world around her. Which leads to the deterioration of their relationship as Nora discovers she needs to express herself and therefore seeks to escape the stifling confines of his opinions.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Henrik Ibsen uses connecting themes such as the uncovering of Torvald’s true nature, his real characterization of Nora and the inevitable hampering of Nora’s rightful individualistic growth in order to show this moral justification. In the beginning, Nora’s fondness for Torvald knew no limits and she sought to do whatever was possible without due regard for herself to please him. She believes being the source of entertainment, indulgence, and appeasement for Torvald allows for her own source of contentment. Although Torvald commands a certain sentimental affection towards Nora, the source for most of these feelings however come solely from the appreciation of her alluring outwardly complexion. Nora’s intricate emotions and intelligence take a back seat in Torvalds mind to the more important plastic image that she is mandated to portray. Perfect examples of this dynamic throughout the whole story…
- 1095 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Also in A Doll’s House, you will find that things are not always what they seem. One of the main examples of this, is the various sides of Nora that she uncovers throughout the course of the play. She goes from being told, “Nora, you’re just a child” [pg.951 Ibsen] by Mrs. Linde, to an untypical Victorian woman. She appears to be a spendthrift to Torvald, when really she is paying off a debt she owes to…
- 605 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Ibsen uses the symbolism of nicknames to represent how Nora’s façade influences how Torvald treats her because her true personality is…
- 607 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Nora Helmer is considered a childish young woman in the play. She lets her husband control her; she acts as if she doesn’t have a mind of her own When she around her husband she acts like she is afraid of him. Every time he tells her to do something like a little puppet she does it. She doesn’t have money of her own so she have to ask him for it .He is always being sarcastic towards her. The only reason he treats her like a child is because she lets him. Since he is the man of the house she follows his rules and order like she is one of his children. Nora let her husband tells her what to do, what to eat and what clothes to were. While her husband to busy controlling her, he doesn’t realized that Nora has a little conniving mind of her own.…
- 284 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
A Doll’s House has several high points that lead up to what I’ve considered the most defining moment. When Torvald finally reads the letter Krogstad (a fellow schoolmate and an employee at the bank) wrote revealing that it was not from Nora’s father that she borrowed money, but from him, what follows was totally unexpected by me. It seems that the situation of her husband falling ill and the decisions she had to make in regards to that, forced her to grow. In the end, Nora makes a decision that she doesn’t want to be married to her husband Torvald any longer, and she tells him so. The line, “We’ve been married for eight years. Doesn’t it occur to you that this is the first time the two of us, you and I, husband and wife, have had a serious conversation?” (Isben 1879 p. 590) says Nora, licks at where she is going with this conversation between the two of them.…
- 815 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays -
A Dollhouse begins with an ordinary couple who seems neither to be extraordinary or plain. They have money, a nice house, and a family. Nora has money spending problems which is probably to overcompensate for her underlying feelings of misery, and Torbert is a loving husband but has no respect for Nora’s opinions and intellect because she is a women. With realism…
- 1555 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
Nora and Torvald are a married couple and been taking on many challenges in their relationship.Torvald basically takes care of and provides for Nova and their children. During their conversation in Act 3 it talks about how she was been transferred from her father’s hands to torvald hands. Nora feels like torvald is treating her like a poor women from hand to mouth. This means that he is treating her like she can’t do for herself. Torvald is taking over her life and when her father was alive he did the same that’s why her life consist of nothing. Torvald is very physically controlling, treats Nora like she’s a child and doesn't trust her with money. The expression Nora used as “ doll child” and “doll wife” is that her life was controlled by her husband and father. By expression her feelings she tells torvald how she feels. She says, “You and Papa have committed a great sin against me. It is your fault that I have made nothing of my life.”. She doesn’t have anything to fall back on besides what her husband gives her. She can’t do anything on her own without getting an approval from Torvald.…
- 592 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
A Doll’s House is centered mostly on the social injustices that women must face. According to Novelguide.com, Helmer sides with society instead of his wife when he is made aware of her crime. Instead of taking the…
- 243 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
Joan Templeton writes that Nora’s character in, A Doll’s House was like two different personalities. The obedient and playful Nora portrayed in Acts 1 and 2 could never have become the Nora that was portrayed in Act 3. Joan is not at all convinced by Nora’s character and states that this play has been “largely discredited by critics, directors and actresses.” Joan’s reaction to this play was quite the opposite from Marvin. (Templeton)…
- 320 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
At the beginning of the play, Nora seems completely at ease and demonstrates many childlike aspects. Her relationship with Torvaldis comparable with a father and daughter as Torvald addresses Nora with a range of childish nicknames, such as “skylark” and “featherhead”. However, we are given the impression that Nora does not seem to find this patronizing, as she responds affectionately to her husband’s teasing, for example, “Yes!” when Torvald calls “Is it my little squirrel bustling about?”. Ibsen’s use of stage directions also portray Nora’s obedience towards Torvald, as they present Nora as quiet and timid when in the presence of her husband, “playing with his coat buttons” and “without raising her eyes to his” as though she is a shy pet, waiting for orders. Due to Victorian standards of marriage, Nora is expected to serve her husband’s every need whilst keeping quiet about her own, much like a loyal pet.This means that sheneeds his permission for everythingas a woman in the Victorian era is not trusted to make decisions by herself as she is expected to make mistakes. Women were looked down upon and treated as accessories while men were treated like kings.…
- 1174 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
Early on it is made very evident through the conversation with husband that she is meant to be the face of their marriage. Ibsen introduces the fact that Nora is not allowed sweets; something that seems strange in this day and age, but in the 19th century was not uncommon. It shows the power a husband had over his wife in that time as well as the submissive behavior women adopted in order to have a proper marriage.…
- 1507 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
In “A Doll’s House” Torvald Helmer and Nora start out to seem as a happy married couple with three young children. In the beginning Nora is seen as woman who cares about her children and her husband but someone who also cares greatly about money. Torvald is seen as a man who is important in the society. Nora was portrayed as a very caring wife when it is revealed that she borrowed money illegally from Krogstad to fund the trip to Italy to try and save her husband life because he was sick. Once Krogstad begins to try and blackmail her Nora tries everything in her power to prevent Torvald from discovering the truth so that his pride and reputation would not be hurt or challenged. When Torvald finally discovers the truth about his wife Nora borrowing the money illegally, he was told that the money was from Nora’s father; he became enraged and insulted her by saying things such as “I won’t let you bring up the children” and “Now you’ve destroyed all my happiness. You’ve ruined my whole future.” (Ibsen). After Torvald discovers that Krogstad returned the contract, which Nora forged with her father’s signature, he is filled with happiness and tries to dismiss all the insults that he said to Nora. Nora snapped inside and decided to leave Torvald, she declared that she was going to “stand completely on my own, if I’m going to understand myself and everything around me.” (Ibsen). After she finished talking finally and explaining herself she left her husband, three children, and everything he had given her behind.…
- 893 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Nora Helmer- Seems happy in the beginning of the play. Teasing Torwald, speaking that she is so excited that his job is giving him more money and loves their family and friends. She is just like a doll, pampered, perfect and pretty. Torwald refers to her as a “silly girl”. She understands the business details related to the debt she has accumulated by taking out a loan to preserve Torvald’s health says that she is brave and intelligent and shows how she is courageous by breaking the law for her husband.…
- 667 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Responders are immediately aware that the relationship between Helmer and his wife Nora imposes a barrier to Nora fulfilling this need. Throughout the play, we see Helmer degrading and belittling Nora through the chastising tone of “little featherbrain” and belittling terms of endearment such as “my little lark” and “my little squirrel”, a pattern successfully captured by Brian Johnston in 1932 when he claimed that “Nora herself actually is the creation of Torvald’s aesthetic imagination”. We become immediately aware that with the repetition of “my” and the references to animals, Ibsen portrays Nora as a possession of Helmer rather than an individual or person. We can also see by Helmer’s repetition of “little” to portray Nora that he judges her as his inferior. This is further reinforced in the opening scenes of the play, when Helmer objectifies Nora with the repetition of the word “it”. Here, we can see the social injustice where he denies her human identity, suggesting her role in his life is an object for his use. Reflecting the problematic values and customs of its nineteenth century context, Johnston further explains that “It is the very ordinariness of the pair … that makes the play’s analysis of marriage so disturbing”, because the issues here clearly reflect a view of marriage…
- 3188 Words
- 8 Pages
Better Essays -
A Doll’s House by Henrik Ibsen was first performed in 1879 when European society strictly enforced male supremacy over women. The play consists of a middle class couple, Torvald and Nora Helmer, who seem to have the perfect marriage, three children, and a pending respectable income with the husband’s recent promotion to bank manager. Torvald treats Nora like a doll, manicuring and manipulating her looks and actions. Although his controlling demeanor is concealed by innocent nicknames and monetary allowances, the affects of his domination over his wife are eventually exposed. At the end of the play, Nora leaves in a haze of anguish after her husband fails to defend her when she is accused of legal fraud in a loan she had taken to save Torvald’s life. Some people say that Nora was right to leave and flee the control of her demeaning husband to seek her individuality, but many argue the contrary when considering what she left behind, what she could have demanded and changed at home, and what she would face as an independent woman defending herself in a 19th century, male biased society. Although some may assertively argue that Nora was right to leave her home, others suggest the she was not right to leave considering the abandonment of her children, the responsibility she could have demanded from her husband, and the prejudice against independent women in her society.…
- 1908 Words
- 8 Pages
Better Essays