Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Reactions on Reaction Paper

Satisfactory Essays
769 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Reactions on Reaction Paper
Reaction on Reaction Paper

The first thing that came to my mind when I have heard about Reaction paper is “What exactly is it?” and before I get an understanding of that, I resisted that change. But later, when I have studied about it and understood its purpose, I have started thinking “Why people avoid change at the first look without an analysis?” The general human tendency is to live in a comfortable zone in which he has lived for quite some time. He draws a circle, thinks that circle is his whole world. Any small change to that particular circle causes lot of discomfort to him and the first thing he does is to resist the change. The reaction can be a positive one or negative one and it depends on four parameters Attitude, Pre-experience, Knowledge and Mindset of the person who is exposed to that particular situation. I am going to explore a little more about all these parameters in this reaction paper.

Attitude of a person has roots in the environment he has been brought up. There can be two types of attitude: positive and negative. If he has seen all the negative reactions from the people surrounding him, he will react in a negative way to whatever he faces. The same is applicable even to positive attitude. It takes lot of effort and time to change the attitude of the person. For example, a positive attitude person, when hears about Reaction paper, thinks that “This is something different from what I have seen till now. It looks very interesting and let me try it out” and negative attitude person thinks “Why is this reaction paper? Why do we have to change the traditional system? Anyways it won’t bring much change in my thinking”. When we talk about attitude, remember that it comes without any thought process. It is just the impulse effect.

Pre-experience is another parameter which highly influences the resistance to change. If the person has faced similar situation in the past and his positive attitude has not brought him any fruitful results, he will immediately react to the change. He won’t be doing an analysis what exactly happened in the past situation and how exactly the new situation is different from that. The moment he brings in the pros and cons of the both situations, he will be in a good position to analyse the situation. But for this, he should have faced the similar situations with different outcomes because of different attitudes. If he has seen the same outcome even with different approaches, then he is bound to react in a negative way to the situation.

Mindset as a factor depends on mood of the person at that moment. If the person has been tired for the complete day, he won’t be in a position to accept the change. This is applicable to sad/fear/angry moods. When he is in any of the moods as mentioned above, negative matter is generated in the brain and that affects his mindset to the situation. In contrast, if the person is in a joyous mood, he readily accept the change at that moment even without analysis as joy/happiness produces positive matter in the brain.

Complete knowledge of the situation is also another factor which affects the reaction/action. Depending on the amount of knowledge, person’s perception of the situation changes. If he has the complete knowledge of the situation, he will react in a positive way. One example can be policy communication in the Organization. When the employer communicates well about the change through workshops, fun events and drives the need for it, then it takes very less time for the employees to get adjusted to the change. In contrast to that, if you just talk about change without giving the knowledge about why it is required, why now etc, then employees are tend to react in a negative way to the change.

In brief, if the person can control all the four factors mentioned above, he takes the change process in positive way.

If I have to link it with one of the Teachings from the class, I will say that my question of “Why people avoid change at the first look without an analysis?” is the problem statement and the theory I searched for is people reactions to the change. I identified four variables to identify the cause for the reaction. Finally, I have developed my own theory of “Reasons for the reaction of the person to a situation and ways to control it”

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    References: Egan, R. W. (2004). Change and resistance, Help for the practitioner of change, Retrieved from (http://bluehawk.monmouth.edu/glosoft/papers/Egan_HICSS-38_2005.pdf…

    • 1827 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Identify the potential sources of resistance to change and develop strategies to manage resistance to change.…

    • 601 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    issues on resistance to change and examine their relationship to one of the objectives of…

    • 4334 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Socialization Paper

    • 460 Words
    • 1 Page

    person, place, thing, or event. There are many various factors that contribute to attitude. Attitude…

    • 460 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    An attitude can be defined as a “predisposition to act in a certain way towards some aspect of one’s environment, including other people” Mednick et al, (1975). Many theories have been put forward to predict attitude change, Argyle (1994). However, attitudes are extremely difficult to define and can’t be directly seen or measured, so behaviour is inferred from what people say or do. An attitude is the subjective evaluation of objects, people, events, ideas, activities and feelings. This evaluation is normally of a positive or negative nature and is based normally on experiences which you have conflicting feelings towards. Attitudes have a past, present and future, to which behaviour develops in a sequence. Many believe there are three components…

    • 3084 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reaction Paper

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Elizabeth Bishop’s “The Hanging of the Mouse”, places animals in the roles of humans in reference to an execution. The writer uses animals to replace humans to possibly convey a message or point of view towards the death penalty. In the story, the mouse is being executed for what we believe is some sort of crime. It isn’t clear whether or not the mouse actually committed a crime, but we are led to believe that an act occurred in which caused the mouse to be executed on this particular day.…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Schuler, A. J. (2003) Overcoming Resistance to Change: Top Ten Reasons for Change Resistance. (Schuler Solutions, Inc., Virginia). Retrieved from http://www.schulersolutions.com…

    • 2356 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The resistance can be implicit (or covert) or explicit (or overt). Resistance to change can be classified into individual resistance and organizational resistance. Individuals resist change because they consider it as a threat to their habits, security and economic conditions. Organizational resistance occurs mainly because of structural inertia, group inertia, and fear of losing power, expertise or control over resources.…

    • 23155 Words
    • 93 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    According to Robbins and Judge (2007), resistance to change is derived from two sources: individuality and organizational. Resistance resulting from an individual is due to the perceptions and personalities of people in the workplace. For example, change may cause insecurity in people and resistance because change threatens and alters their perception of job security (Robbins & Judge, 2007). Organizational resistance is linked to the formulation of the organizational structure. Structural inertia (e.g. formalized regulations) would be an example of an organizational source of resistance. These sources of resistance to organizational changes can be difficult to detect because of the way in which they present themselves. Robbins and Judge (2007) noted that, “resistance can be overt, implicit, immediate, or deferred” (p. 647).…

    • 1583 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    To identify the key elements of the resistanceto change described in this situation, one may make use of the six Change Approaches of Kotter and Schlesinger.[1]The model prevents, minimizes or descreases resistance to change in organizations. According to Kotter and Schlesinger (1979), there are four reasons that why people resist change, three of which are applicable to this case:…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Problems at Perrier

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages

    be a clearer definition of the key elements of the resistance to change and we will have also…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This research focuses on resistance to change from two perspectives. The first is the relation between the defense mechanisms of the individual and the intention to resist change. The second is the relation between interaction between the change agent and change recipient and resistance to change, i.e. the contribution of the change agent to resistance. A web-based questionnaire was used to gather quantitative data from 179 employees within several organizations in the Netherlands. The questionnaire consists of three parts. The first two parts are a retest of Bovey and Hede (2001) on the relation between defense mechanisms and the behavioral intention to resist change. The third part was a new developed scale based on the theory of Ford, Ford and d’Amelio (2008) on the role of the change agent in the occurrence of resistance. First, the reliability of the new scale to measure the contribution of the change agent was tested. After that, the relation between defense mechanisms, the contribution of the change agent and resistance to change was tested statistically. The results show that the scale on the contribution of the change agent is reliable. From the factor analysis several subscales were created, with keywords that are mostly in line with the concepts…

    • 28934 Words
    • 116 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    An early researcher on the topic, Alvin Zander (1950) defined resistance to change as “behavior which is intended to protect an individual from the effects of real or imagined change”, as cited in an article from the Journal of Applied Behavioral Science (Dent & Goldberg, 1999, p. 34). Individuals can begin to sense that their security or position might be threatened by change, and will naturally rush to defend the status quo. Organizational change has the potential to breed uncertainty and confrontation in employees, which can make it difficult or even impossible to put organizational improvements into practice, and any management’s capacity for achieving maximum benefits from change will depend in part on how successful they are in constructing and sustaining a climate that diminishes resistance behavior and promotes acceptance and support (Folger & Skarlicki, 1999, p. 25).…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the nowadays dynamic business world, change is import and crucial for any organization to survive and thriving. The quote on the front page is basically summarizing the importance of change. However it is not simple to implement change within an organization. Resistance to change is one of the biggest obstacles of implementing change within an organization. There are a few reasons why people resist changing and they are fear of the unknown and cultural differences. In order to understand about resistance to change, in this paper we will analyze the definition of resistance to change, why there is a need for change and how does resistance to change occurs. Also we will take a look at some implications that manager can use to overcome resistance to change.…

    • 1398 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    reaction paper

    • 1737 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The topic I choose to react on is the concept of CSR. The topic explains what exactly Corporate Social Responsibility is. It explains that in applying Corporate Social Responsibility it focuses the importance of keeping or looking out for the best interests not just for the shareholders but the whole society as well. The company’s business operations must take in consideration of the interests of the stakeholders. The report also tackles why the need for the CSR arises, its impact and benefits to the company itself and to the society, its core characteristics, the ISO standards- what it is for, the pyramid of CSR namely: economic responsibility, legal responsibility, ethical responsibility and philanthropic responsibility and the arguments that arises in applying CSR. Issues about the actions of companies regarding how they abuse the use of natural resources in their conduct of their operations, how they overlook the employee’s interests and don’t take into considerations the customer’s wellbeing in their products just to earn their money is very prevalent nowadays. Hence, the concept of corporate social responsibility arises and become important aspect in conducting business.…

    • 1737 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics