Preview

Rationalism - Descartes, Spinoza and Leibniz

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1718 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Rationalism - Descartes, Spinoza and Leibniz
Rationalism is the principle that maintains that through reason alone we can gain at least some positive knowledge of the world. The three major rationalists, Rene Descartes, Baruch Spinoza and Gottfried Welhelm Leibniz, used this idea in order to defy skepticism and expose the true nature of reality. However, each philosopher is frequently in disagreement. The idea for ‘God’, and what constitutes substance, matter and reality are the four key structural beliefs that aid each rationalist in the forming of their arguments. Yet, it is these four concepts and the arguments behind them that cause the inconsistency found in rationalism. The idea that reason can provide positive solutions to the various questions put forth is made doubtful through their disparity. Thus, it is through the contradiction of the major rationalist that the viability of rationalism is undermined.

Questions such as; are my senses trust-worthy? What is my essential nature? All pertain to the major question of what constitutes as substance? This issue is the first fundamental conflict between the three philosophers. As Descartes was the first to touch on this problem, I will deal with him primarily. Descartes method of doubt, found in Meditations, was to doubt everything. He did not trust his senses, as they were prone to mistakes. He presented the idea that, as dreams can be so clear and vivid he doubted we could know whether we are dreaming or not. He also stated that we could not know whether our whole concept of reality was real as it could be fabricated by an evil demon. Then, it seems, everything must remain in doubt, not so for Descartes. He found that there is one thing that you can never be deceived on and that is; ‘you cannot doubt that you are doubting.’ You cannot be deceived that you are conscious or not as the very act of thinking you are conscious, is a conscious act. ‘Cogito Ergo Sum.’ I think therefore I am. Thus the mind becomes a core substance for Descartes.

Yet in

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    One burning and enduring problem in philosophy to which we have given considerable examination is the question of the existence of God--the superlative being that philosophers have defined and dealt with for centuries. After reading the classic arguments of St. Anselm and St. Thomas Aquinas, the contentious assertions of Ernest Nagel, and the compelling eyewitness accounts of Julian of Norwich, I have been introduced to some of the most revered and referenced arguments for and against God's existence that have been put into text. All of them are well-thought and well-articulated arguments, but they have their holes. The question of God's true existence, therefore, is still not definitively answered and put to rest; the intensity of this debate probably never will mitigate. Many theologians and academics honestly admit that no matter what any philosopher may assert regarding this topic, whether or not a certain person believes in God's existence is a question of faith and nothing more.…

    • 1537 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the course of time, many philosophers, dogmatic religions and even individual human beings themselves have tried to prove the existence of God. The recurrent question that constantly arises is whether or not you can prove the existence of God solely by rational thinking alone. To that, the answer is no. It is not possible to prove the existence of God solely by rational thinking as you also need to incorporate aspects of faith, but rational thinking helps solidify your beliefs pertaining to God and leaves the answers we cannot conceive rationally up to faith. You cannot understand something outside of your existence rationally because you cannot experience it or see it; you can only theorize, believe and trust in it. You will never be able to reason what you have no knowledge of. In this essay, I will argue that in…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Rationalists are right to claim that knowledge is a priori and depends primarily on reason. Discuss.…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stuart, M., (1999). Descartes Extended Substance. New Essay on the Rationalists. Oxford: Oxford University Press.…

    • 1927 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Substance Dualism

    • 1770 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In order to truly understand Descartes’ argument of substance dualism, it is important to understand the methodological, reductionist approach that he employs to build his theory. In the First Meditation, Descartes sets the basis for his ontological search for truth by rejecting all of his previous beliefs, experiences, and memories in order to begin from a clean, uninfluenced position. He says, “I have no senses. Body, shape, extension,…

    • 1770 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Kant vs Aristotle

    • 1314 Words
    • 6 Pages

    During the 17th and 18th century two philosophers, Plato and Aristotle, arose carving for themselves a trench in the philosophical world. We can see the biggest distinction between the two in their theories of how we know things exist. The traditions of Plato and Aristotle have been dubbed rationalism and empiricism respectively. Under these traditions many well known philosophers have formed their own theories of God, existence and the material world. Through these individual theories I will show how each fits into the category of either Rationalist or Imperialist. The Plutonian philosophers to be discussed will include Descartes, Spinoza, and Leibniz. And the Aristotelian philosophers will include Locke, Berkeley and Hume.…

    • 1314 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rationalism Exam

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Rationalism is the part of philosophy that our foundation for knowledge is found within reason.…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    But, all of these sensory responses are purely physical. So, another explanation was needed in order to describe that which in not physical such as thoughts, emotion, pleasure, and pain. And the result of this was Descartes ' substance dualism theory. Because things such as pleasure, pain, thoughts, and emotion do not occur physically, but rather in the mind, his conclusion was that they are two separate things. His main reasoning for this is clearly stated when he says "I saw that while I could pretend that I had no body and that there was no world and no place for me to be in, I could not for all that pretend that I did not exist. I saw on the contrary that from the mere face that I thought of doubting the truth of other things, it followed quite evidently and certainly that I existed..." (Stevenson 86). In this, he explains that it was possible for him to doubt the existence of his body, without doubting his own existence as a thinking being. Therefore his existence as a thinking being must…

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    When Descartes decided to tear down his beliefs and start fresh, he needed a foundation upon which to build his ideology. When judging what reality is, God must be considered. He/she must be taken out of a religious concept and proven to exist, exist in a way in which we cannot be deceived into only thinking is real. The proof of the existence of God in this way forms the backbone of Descartes’ further forays into proving what is reality.…

    • 1354 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    To further understand this, we have to understand how each man came to these beliefs. Descartes came to the conclusion that he could not trust his senses due to the fact that they weren't totally reliable via a chain of reasoning that held nothing as automatically 'true'. In spite of the fact that his senses were not completely reliable, the fact that they did sense something was proof enough that material existed because that is what his physical senses were limited to.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes and Skepticism

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This essay will explain Descartes argument of the existence of God with specific reference to the Third Meditation discussed in the class handout- ‘Descartes and the problem of Skepticism’.…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes Belief in God

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In his groundbreaking work, Meditations on First Philosophy, the French philosopher Rene Descartes lays the groundwork for many philosophical principles by attempting to “establish a bold and lasting knowledge” (171)1. The foundations for knowledge Descartes established would go on to influence a plethora of other philosophers and philosophical works. Descartes argues in his meditations first from the point of view of complete skepticism, using skepticism as a tool in order to discover what is real. Through this method, Descartes explains the existence of man as a “thinking thing,” the capacity for human error, the overall trustworthiness of our senses, the existence of a physical world, the mind and body as separate entities, and the existence of an infinitely perfect God. Descartes uses a variety of premises to help back up his idea of a prefect God. The main idea concluded from these premises is that man alone could not have come up with the idea of infinite perfection, so the idea of God comes from God himself, thus proving his existence. Although his argument for the existence of God is the least strong of his philosophical arguments, I agree with Descartes because humans alone could not grasp the idea of infinity or an infinitely perfect being. I intend examine and defend Descartes’ explanation of the existence of God, propose valid counter-arguments and my own answers to those objections.…

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Descartes vs Hume

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages

    René Descartes realized that many of the things that he have accepted as the truth was false opinions, and consequentially the principles that were built upon them. He wanted to start anew by try to find out “the truth”, and then build upon that, because the foundation of science requires absolute certainty. In his attempt to find “the truth,” he started to criticize all of the things he had formally believed: applying the method of doubts, and then remove from the foundation what he found to be doubtable or deducible. He did this as he believed as his doubt increase, certainty decrease and vice versa. By the end of Meditation I, he was in a state called “Abyss,” where he was skeptical of all things and decided that the empirical world was presented to him by an evil demon He then reasoned that for him to be deceived by the demon, he must exist as something, a mind or a thinking thing…

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    I believe that when we start believing in God is from birth. We are taught about god from day one until the day we die. My belief and I tell everybody that will listen to me that God is for real he created us and he takes care of us throughout our lives. When we start going to church at a young age and start to learn more about the bible we gather information on what God has done for us. This gains knowledge on what we are taught and gives us the facts of his existence and we should spread the word to people that did not have the privilege of going to church at the young age. These are the people that are hard to get to believe because they do not have the knowledge of God. The first question I will ask them is tell my why you do not believe in god. Their answer is usually no one has ever seen him. And my response is who do you think created us. This question usually makes them to stop and think for a minute and they seem to believe me more and more.…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    It seems that no matter the circumstances under which a culture and society develops its people instinctively develop a method, or a reason, for their existence. This aspect of human beings to long for a reason or purpose to life is distinct to human beings opposed to other living creatures of the earth. For thousands of years philosophers have argued and explored what the nature of existence is, and even questioned whether or not they existed themselves. In researching the philosophies of Rene Descartes, Lao tzu, Rhazes, and Lame Deer I have discovered a variety of explanations of the nature of existence. Although the theories of these four philosophers may vary greatly, I have found even more interesting the similarities present between them. Separated greatly by space and time these philosophers have developed distinct and unique purposes to existence that share some intriguing and extraordinary similarities as well as differences. The purpose and meaning of the search for truth of these four philosophers can be most simply categorized by the differences between rationalism and empiricism.…

    • 1550 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays