Ratifying The Constitution Essay
Ratification of U.S. Constitution In 1787 when the U.S. government was frail under the Articles of Confederation there was a debate on whether to ratify the U.S. Constitution. Those who supported the ratification were the Federalists, and those who opposed were known as the Anti- Federalists. Federalists believed in the idea of a strong central government while on the other hand Anti- federalists wanted their own states to have the right to set their own laws. The federalists group in which James Madison was advocated with, composed essays known as The Federalist Papers along with Alexander Hamilton and John Jay in which Madison wrote Federalist Number 10. Therefore, Madison imposes that factionalism could be potentially dangerous for the country, and the nation would benefit from a representational democracy. Madison wrote, “A republic, by which I mean a government in which the scheme of representation takes
…show more content…
Henry revealed their belief that the act of ratifying the constitution would eventually create a monarchy. Henry addressed, “I need not take much pains to show that the principles of this system are extremely pernicious, impolitic, and dangerous. Is this a monarchy, like England a compact between prince and people, with checks on the former to secure the liberty of the latter?” Patrick Henry spread his message on how unsafe the Anti-Federalists felt, believing their public liberty would be taken away with the ratification.
In my opinion, I believe that I would choose to be on the federalist side if I were to be living at that period. I think ratifying the Constitution would be the most ethical choice because it forms a more unified nation. A strong centralized government is what would keep a country stable, for I do not see how the country could be unified if each state were to have their own rights creating
Henry revealed their belief that the act of ratifying the constitution would eventually create a monarchy. Henry addressed, “I need not take much pains to show that the principles of this system are extremely pernicious, impolitic, and dangerous. Is this a monarchy, like England a compact between prince and people, with checks on the former to secure the liberty of the latter?” Patrick Henry spread his message on how unsafe the Anti-Federalists felt, believing their public liberty would be taken away with the ratification.
In my opinion, I believe that I would choose to be on the federalist side if I were to be living at that period. I think ratifying the Constitution would be the most ethical choice because it forms a more unified nation. A strong centralized government is what would keep a country stable, for I do not see how the country could be unified if each state were to have their own rights creating