R. V. Latimer Case Brief
Tracey Latimer the daughter of Robert Latimer was 12 years old and had cerebral
palsy, Because of this she required around the clock care by her parents. She was
not dying from this but she was in extreme pain. Tracey went through multiple
surgeries. Robert believed that putting his daughter through more surgeries would
be cruel and unjust. As a result of this Robert decided to bring his daughter into the
garage and put her in his car, he then turned the engine on and poisoned her with
carbon monoxide. Tracey’s mother was not involved in this, Latimer denied killing
her at first but he later then confessed for his actions .In the trial R. V Latimer
(1997) Robert was convicted for second degree murder although the Supreme …show more content…
In the resulting second trial, Mr. Latimer was again indicted second degree
murder, however he was sentenced to just a single year in jail instead of the
minimum required ten under the Criminal Code, since in the conditions of the case
10 years was seen as cruel and unusual. The Saskatchewan Court of Appeal later
expanded the sentence to 10 years. Mr. Latimer in the end advanced the case to the
Supreme Court, contending that the sentence was too long as well as that the trial
was uncalled for in light of the fact that the judge chose the guard of need couldn't
be contended despite the fact that this choice came simply after the resistance had
contended it. It was additionally asserted that the judge had deluded the jury into
feeling that they could impact the length of the sentence. Since numerous in the jury
longed for a lighter sentence than that endorsed by the Criminal Code, it has been
contended that the jury may have turned to jury invalidation had they realized that
they couldn't choose the length of the sentence.
The Court first held that not just was the safeguard of need not able to legitimize
Robert Latimer's activities additionally the inapplicability of the guard ought to
palsy, Because of this she required around the clock care by her parents. She was
not dying from this but she was in extreme pain. Tracey went through multiple
surgeries. Robert believed that putting his daughter through more surgeries would
be cruel and unjust. As a result of this Robert decided to bring his daughter into the
garage and put her in his car, he then turned the engine on and poisoned her with
carbon monoxide. Tracey’s mother was not involved in this, Latimer denied killing
her at first but he later then confessed for his actions .In the trial R. V Latimer
(1997) Robert was convicted for second degree murder although the Supreme …show more content…
In the resulting second trial, Mr. Latimer was again indicted second degree
murder, however he was sentenced to just a single year in jail instead of the
minimum required ten under the Criminal Code, since in the conditions of the case
10 years was seen as cruel and unusual. The Saskatchewan Court of Appeal later
expanded the sentence to 10 years. Mr. Latimer in the end advanced the case to the
Supreme Court, contending that the sentence was too long as well as that the trial
was uncalled for in light of the fact that the judge chose the guard of need couldn't
be contended despite the fact that this choice came simply after the resistance had
contended it. It was additionally asserted that the judge had deluded the jury into
feeling that they could impact the length of the sentence. Since numerous in the jury
longed for a lighter sentence than that endorsed by the Criminal Code, it has been
contended that the jury may have turned to jury invalidation had they realized that
they couldn't choose the length of the sentence.
The Court first held that not just was the safeguard of need not able to legitimize
Robert Latimer's activities additionally the inapplicability of the guard ought to