In the excerpt, Surveillance is Necessary the author, Dan White is stating an argument that people who have a different ethnic background are more likely to be shoplifters. I disagree with this argument because anyone can be a shoplifter. It shouldn’t matter what race they are. People would agree with white's argument because in the article “ Racial Profiling- it works” by Anna Amberg, states “it's a rational judgment, based on facts, that helps us make sense of our would.” (Amberg Paragraph 3)…
3. The Supreme Court decided that even though the executive order was on the shady side of the Constitution, it was justified because they were in a time of “emergency and peril”.…
1. One of the most important concepts in government and politics is the concept of legitimacy. It is generally agreed that if a government lacks legitimacy, it cannot govern. a. What is legitimacy? What role does it serve in governance? Illustrate your response with examples. b. When comparing democratic governments with dictatorships, we find that dictators generally have greater difficulty establishing legitimacy than democratic leaders. Why is this the case? Illustrate your response with examples. c. It is often noted that in winning the year 2000 presidential race, George Bush’s victory provided him with a weak case for legitimacy. Why? (If you don’t know this answer off the top of your head, do a quick Google search on the controversies associated with the election.) d. How did the September 11, 2001 attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon greatly strengthen George Bush’s claims for legitimacy?…
Over the past seven years the Bush administration, possibly longer the U.S government has been monitoring the internet and telephone activity of American citizens in secrecy. Many of the American citizens being monitored have not been convicted of any crime and have caused no suspicion of wrong doing. Despite these circumstances these private citizens are being unlawfully monitored by the U.S government without consent. This scandal has caused a split decision in the American society; whether the U.S. government is justified for their actions, when the secret surveillance began, why and how long it will last, also is government monitoring really a method to protect U.S. citizens and how do citizens feel about this scandal, lastly where is the line drawn and what can citizens do to ensure their voice is heard.…
The war on terror presents an unpredictable challenge for the United States. Throughout history, the motivation of man’s self-interest has concluded in the domination of those with little or no power. Habeas Corpus is written in the constitution as a right of the people and should be a safeguard to protect all accused persons, but many presidents have found ways not to enforce the right. In history the writ of habeas corpus has been challenged by many president from Lincoln to most recently Bush with abuse of power by the president. I will exam whether the president goes against the constitution to protect the safety of its citizens in a time of war or is it an abuse of power because the president is the commander and chief. Is the president acting on behalf of the people or is it a personal agenda.…
Take a second to think about that fleeting feeling of being watched. Every second of every minute of every day spent on technology is being recorded and scrutinized, so why is it that the feeling so fleeting? The National Security Agency, or NSA, had such a promising name, but they ultimately slandered and disgraced it with their horrendous violations of privacy. Action must be taken in an effort to abolish the unforgivable acts of domestic surveillance performed every single day by the NSA.…
“Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety”. A famous quote by none other than Benjamin Franklin, and although he did not live to see it, his words would be part of almost every argument considering internet surveillance. This ongoing debate is immense because many different people from all aspects of society use the internet, so everyone is affected by the outcome of the debate. There is no easy solution when it comes to the balance between security and freedom, but in the end the right thing to do is to allow people to not be monitored when surfing the internet as it is a violation of the constitution, very impractical, and morally wrong.…
Staff writer Daniel Wood argues in his article, “LAPD shooting reignites debate: Are police cameras effective?” that body cameras are not a reliable source for justifying crimes. Wood claims that there is much more factors considered in justifying events such as police brutality, and video footage is only one of the many. In other words, Woods addresses today’s controversies of police brutality on African Americans and criticizes body cameras as an imprudent way to justify police brutality.…
There have been many complaints about if body cameras on police officers will work or not. There are two people that have different opinions that other people that think body cameras will stop police brutality against police officers. William N. Grigg, and Joshua Krause these people think body cameras on police officers will not work, and will not stop or decrease the violence from police officers. Grigg’s argument is Their arguments are that the officers from the SDPD forgot to turn on their body cameras while on duty. A crime that happened in April, Officer Neal Browder fatally shot a 31-year-old man named Fridoon Zalbeg Rawshannehad, who had been suspected of carrying a knife. After the shooting, no weapon was found, although Rawshannehad was carrying what has been described as “a shiny looking object.”(San Diego Cops…
“Give a man a mask and he will become his true self.” – Oscar Wilde…
In Obama on Mass Government Surveillance, Then and Now, it states that while Obama was a senator he says "that means no more illegal wiretapping of American citizens...no more ignoring the law when it is inconvenient." (Breslow) Obama then has his administration "collect indiscriminately and in bulk --- regardless of whether they are suspected of any wrongdoing." (Breslow) For those who follow anyone against national security needs to really consider whether or not they are doing so because the person is well-known and influential, or because they actually believe in their rights. Obama does not act as a…
Domestic Surveillance is a withering matter which not many people care about because they think that it does not affect them. However, it is common in the daily lives of American citizens. But the question remains, how much does the U.S. government know about your personal privacy? Face it, it is a fact the United States peers on our personal life more than what you may think, and it does, in fact, appertain every single citizen of our nation. It is hidden, bathed in laws but linked to another.…
Police officers argue that body cameras can deal with privacy issues. Privacy won’t become an issue if some of the police officers actually did their job right. Many of the police departments have been denying to wear body cameras because cameras may prevent people from coming forward as credible witnesses to help assist with investigations, due to fear of public exposure and the fear of someone coming after them to kill them. Technological issues related to the cameras may prevent proper functioning at times and the cops are not able to fix them because they don’t know much about technology. This could be due to a dead battery, damaged components, obstructed lens, and other problems. This could result in personnel missing important witness statements or crucial behavior by officers or citizens. The equipment is expensive as well. Some police departments don’t have the money to buy expensive cameras. The cameras the cops need have to have a lot of storage in them. Plus, cameras need to have long-term batteries so that it won’t die out while on duty. Yes,…
The United States of America is based on freedom and holds capabilities citizens would never have in any other country. Although this is the case, we Americans aware that there is a price for the freedom they were given? “There is no such thing as a free lunch” a saying repeated by many hard-working Americans. Little does the population know that this indeed relates to them as well? Much like any other country, Americans government has kept their civilization in the dark of their true colors. Evidence has surfaced as early as the 1920’s that the government has had surveillance of the population without their knowledge. Extending their surveillance, the government has now invaded on innocent’s…
Many people around the world use social media sites. However, many do not realize that governments are able to use surveillance programs to spy on them. According to Merriam-Webster dictionary, surveillance is the close observation, especially of a suspected spy or criminal and it can be defined as processes of information collection and processing. Surveillance on social media has its positives and negatives and people should know how to use it responsibly, critically and effectively. Surveillance programs endanger the privacy of each Internet user. The reason that surveillance is accepted is because it can help governments find terrorists and can help solve crimes. However, it is a concern for multiple people that there is no law or regulation on how governments are able to use the programs. Moreover, the surveillance programs are sold off the shelf to governments so…
