Quality Research on Children's Play
Johan Meire Childhood & Society Research Centre Nieuwelaan 63, 1860 Meise, BELGIUM Tel.: ++ 32 2 272 07 53 - E-mail: jmeire@k-s.be
Qualitative research on children´s play:
A review of recent literature This presentation is a review of the recent, English-language (mostly peer reviewed) qualitative research on children’s play. It focuses on the place play has in children’s experience and giving sense to the world. Thus, it will leave aside the large and important body of research on the effect or outcomes (benefits and possible harmful consequences) of play which however tells us little on why children like to play so much and in particular on why they play so intensively, on why they are so much absorbed by play. A much more elaborate version of the review will appear in the new edited ICCP book on children’s play. Here, I will focus on just some of the recent contributions and trends in the field; I will not consider methodologies, although the recent turn to visual methods (especially photography) as complementing the very diverse observational methods, should certainly be mentioned in this context (Burke, 2005; Kernan, 2005). In reviewing research on children’s play in the field of folklore, Ackerley (2003, 11) notes a “trend away from the consideration of what children play, to the investigation of why and how these folklore traditions are kept alive”. The comprehensive collections of children’s games “have given way to greater consideration of the conditions under which such play occurs”. This is not only true for studies of ‘child lore’, but for qualitative studies of children’s play in general. Recent research has started to give us a more detailed and more nuanced view of ‘how’ children play – the research on play and gender is a good illustration of this –, while research on children’s own experiences and sense-giving complement the longer established instrumental perspective on ‘why’ children (should) play. This is also related to a somewhat more
Qualitative research on children´s play:
A review of recent literature This presentation is a review of the recent, English-language (mostly peer reviewed) qualitative research on children’s play. It focuses on the place play has in children’s experience and giving sense to the world. Thus, it will leave aside the large and important body of research on the effect or outcomes (benefits and possible harmful consequences) of play which however tells us little on why children like to play so much and in particular on why they play so intensively, on why they are so much absorbed by play. A much more elaborate version of the review will appear in the new edited ICCP book on children’s play. Here, I will focus on just some of the recent contributions and trends in the field; I will not consider methodologies, although the recent turn to visual methods (especially photography) as complementing the very diverse observational methods, should certainly be mentioned in this context (Burke, 2005; Kernan, 2005). In reviewing research on children’s play in the field of folklore, Ackerley (2003, 11) notes a “trend away from the consideration of what children play, to the investigation of why and how these folklore traditions are kept alive”. The comprehensive collections of children’s games “have given way to greater consideration of the conditions under which such play occurs”. This is not only true for studies of ‘child lore’, but for qualitative studies of children’s play in general. Recent research has started to give us a more detailed and more nuanced view of ‘how’ children play – the research on play and gender is a good illustration of this –, while research on children’s own experiences and sense-giving complement the longer established instrumental perspective on ‘why’ children (should) play. This is also related to a somewhat more
References: Ackerley, J. 2002. Playground rhymes keep up with the times. Play and Folklore 42, 4-8. Ackerley, J. 2003. Gender differences in the folklore play of children in primary school playgrounds. Play and Folklore 44, 2-15. Armitage, M. 2004. Hide and seek – where do children spend their time after school? Paper presented at The Second European Conference Child in the City, London, 20-22 October 2004. Arluke, A. 2002. Animal abuse as dirty play. Symbolic Interaction 25, 405-430. Aydt, H. & Corsaro, W. A. 2003. Differences in children’s construction of gender across culture. American Behavioral Scientist 46, 1306-1325. Bai, L. 2005. Children at play: A childhood beyond the Confucian shadow. Childhood 12, 932. Baylina Ferré, M., Ortiz Guitart, A. & Prats Ferret, M. 2006. Children and playgrounds in Mediterranean cities. Children’s Geographies 4, 173-183. Blackford, H. 2004. Playground panopticism. Ring-around-the-children, a pocketful of women. Childhood 11, 227-249. Blatchford, P., Baines, E. & Pellegrini, A. 2003. The social context of school playground games: Sex and ethnic differences, and changes over time after entry to junior school. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 21, 481-505. Blinkert, B. 2004. Quality of the city for children: Chaos and order. Children, Youth and Environments 14 (2), 99-112. Burke, C. 2005. “Play in focus”: Children researching their own spaces and places for play. Children, Youth and Environments 15 (1): 27-53. Corsaro, W. A. 2005. The sociology of childhood. Second edition. Thousand Oaks: Sage. Daschütz, P. 2006. Spare time in the city: A comparison of activity space and leisure mobility of children and adolescents in a park and an inner-city quarter in Vienna. Paper presented at the Third European Conference Child in the City, Stuttgart, 16-18 October 2006. Duran, M. & Zierkiewicz, E. 2004. Fortune-telling games played by Croatian and Polish girls. Paper presented at the 23rd ICCP World Play Conference, ‘Play and Education’, Cracow, 15-17 September 2004. Evaldsson, A.-C. 2003. Throwing like a girl? Situating gender differences in physicality across game contexts. Childhood 10, 475-497. Evaldsson, A.-C. & Corsaro, W. A. 1998. Play and games in the peer cultures of preschool and preadolescent children. An interpretative approach. Childhood 5, 377-402. Factor, J. 2004. Tree stumps, manhole covers and rubbish-tins: The invisible play-lines of a primary school playground. Childhood 11, 142-154. Farver, J. A. M. & Lee-Shin, Y. 2000. Acculturation and Korean-American children’s social and play behaviour. Social Development 9, 316-336. Fjortoft, I. 2004. Landscape as playscape: The effects of natural environments on children’s play and motor development. Children, Youth and Environments 14 (2), 21-44. Goodwin, M. H. 2001. Organizing participation in cross-sex jump rope: Situating gender differences within longitudinal studies of activities. Research on Language and Social Interaction 34, 75-106. 12 Goodwin, M. H. 2002a. Building power asymmetries in girls’ interaction. Discourse & Society 13, 715-730. Goodwin, M.H. 2002b. Exclusion in girls’ peer groups: Ethnographic analysis of language practices on the playground. Human Development 45, 392-415. Harker, C. 2005. Playing and affective time-spaces. Children’s Geographies 3, 47-62. Karsten, L. 2003. Children’s use of public space. The gendered world of the playground. Childhood 10, 457-473. Kernan, Margaret. 2005. Using digital photography to listen to young children’s perspectives of their outdoor play experiences in early childhood education settings. Paper presented at the Childhoods 2005 International Conference, Oslo, 29 June – 3 July 2005. Lindquist, G. 2001. Elusive play and its relations to power. Focaal – European Journal of Anthropology 37, 13-23. Lindstrand, P. 2005. Playground and outdoor play – A literature review. Stockholm: Stockholm International Toy Research Centre. Moore, V. A. 2002. The collaborative emergence of race in children’s play: A case study of two summer camps. Social Problems 49, 58-78. Pellegrini, A. & Blatchford, P. 2002. The developmental and educational significance of recess in schools. EarlyReport Newsletter 29 (1). Pellegrini, A. D., Blatchford, P., Kato, K. & Baines, E. 2004. A short-term longitudinal study of children’s playground games in primary school: Implications for adjustment to school and social adjustment in the USA and the UK. Social Development 13, 107-123. Rasmussen, Kim. 2004. Places for children – children’s places. Childhood 11, 155-173. Riley, J. G. & Jones, R. B. 2005. Investigating gender differences in recess play. PlayRights XXVI (1): 18-21. Rossie, J.-P. 2005. Toys, play, culture and society. An anthropological approach with reference to North Africa and the Sahara. Stockholm: Stockholm International Toy Research Centre. Stone, S. J. & Lozon, C. 2004. The cognitive and social values of play in the learning contexts of mixed-aged children. Paper presented at the 23rd ICCP World Play Conference, ‘Play and Education’, Cracow, 15-17 September 2004. Sutton-Smith, B. 1997. The ambiguity of play. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press. Thomson, S. 2005. ‘Territorialising’ the primary school playground: Deconstructing the geography of playtime. Children’s Geographies 3, 67-78. Thorne, B. 1993. Gender play. Girls and boys in school. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press. Valentine, G. 2004. Public space and the culture of childhood. London: Ashgate. 13