Preview

QRB501 Week 5 CAse Study

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
367 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
QRB501 Week 5 CAse Study
Case Study Week 6
Ashley Norris, Stephanie Bagdasarian, Debbie Ritchie, Adam Garrido and Nancy Ignacio
QRB 501
September 8, 2014
Patricia Towne

Capital Budgeting Case
Our company has $250,000 to spend on acquiring either Corporation A or Corporation B. In determining which Corporation would be the better buy we will look at the Net Present Value (year 1 through 5) of both Corporations, determine the Internal Rate of Return, and conduct an analysis of the information gathered.
Net Present Value (NPV)
Net Present Value (NPV) is the sum of income and outgoing cash flows based on the present value of the same entity. If the net present value of the investment is positive an investment should be made otherwise, if net present value is negative an investment should not be made. When net present value is zero, it is considered positive. Higher net present value is desirable for investment.
In this case, investors want to know what corporation is a better investment Corporation A or Corporation B. Calculating year one through five for both companies determined NPV for both corporations. Corporation A NPV= $20,979.21 and Corporation B MPV= $48,035.14. Based on the information provided, Corporation B is the better investment as the company has a higher NPV than Corporation A.
Analysis
Based on a careful analysis of the information assembled, team A recommends the purchase of corporation B. this company has a significantly higher net present value (NPV) at $48035.14 compared to corporation A at $20979.21. Corporation B also has a higher internal rate of return (IRR) at 16.94% compared to corporation A at 13.05%. At first glance of the income statement, it appears corporation A is a better potential value with a slightly higher net income at $79822.41 compared to corporation B at $79670.51. After analysis and considering calculations that factor the time value of money, corporation B is the clear choice. NPV is the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Xacc 280 Final

    • 2014 Words
    • 9 Pages

    We will be comparing two companies; both are strong and have great credibility. Ideally with a solid competitor we want to show differentials and make a solid contrast. In this case we want to compare at least two years of financial data. A great way to exemplify this is to compare Coke to Pepsi. To say which one is better to drink is debatable, but what we are looking at is which is better to invest in. We will analyze the information provided in the appendixes and make a conscience decision as to which company is stronger, therefore a smarter investment choice. After all, I wouldn’t want you to throw your money down the drain.…

    • 2014 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Proposal A is to build a new factory to decide if this would be a feasible move for the company they need to perform a net present value analysis. To do this they will only need to look at the incremental cash flows, which are as follows:…

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    To calculate this decision one took three ratios in examination in order to make this summary. Within the profitability, liquidity, and solvency ratios, are ratios that determine the financial health of the company and it's weakness. All the ratios are important in making such investments but the three main ratios that were compared, from profitability were the current ratios for both companies, for liquidity the ratio used was the return of assets, and lastly from the solvency ratios were the debt to total assets ratio. The current ratio for the Pepsi Company in 2004 to 2005 were arrange from 1.11 percent and 4.14 percent. This ratio tells me that the Pepsi Company had increase in Assets and Liabilities in 2005. Next, I examined the Return of Assets ratio the Pepsi Company has had in 2004 to 2005. In 2004 the company had 23 percent in return of assets and in 2005 they had a 1.93 percent return in assets, this was a huge increase in returns. Lastly I determined the debt to total assets ratio to see how much assets are provided from their creditors, and in 2004 was at 86 percent and in 2005 it was at 73 percent, which shows the decrease in the creditors activities in the assets obtained within the…

    • 1075 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ideal China Case Analysis

    • 732 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Company A has substantial accumulated tax losses and is unlikely to pay taxes n the foreseeable future. Company B pays corporate taxes at a rate of 35 percent and can deprecate the investment for tax purposes using the five- year MARCS tax deprecation schedule. Suppose the opportunity cost of capital is 8 percent. a. Calculate project NVP for each company. b. What is the IRR of the after-tax cash flows for each company? What does comparison of the IRRs suggest is the effective corporate tax…

    • 732 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Finance Week 6

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages

    What is the project’s NPV? (15 pts) Using our formula and double checked with Microsoft Excel, NPV = (1,100,000/1.15) + (1,450,000/1.15)^2 + (1,300,000/1.15)^3 + (950,000/1.15) ^ 4 – 3,000,000 = $450,866.74…

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    b. What do the net present value, internal rate of return, and payback values from your base scenario and the sales variation scenarios above imply for the proposed…

    • 1375 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Finance Pp

    • 6079 Words
    • 25 Pages

    Hiphop wants to select the project that provides the most value over the next four years. What is the net present value (NPV) of the project that creates the most value for the company? a) b) c) d) e) $34,425 $30,283 $29,964 $29,240 $24,537…

    • 6079 Words
    • 25 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mr. Crosby Sanberg is the Manager of Financial Analysis at General Food Corporation. General Foods is currently starting a new product line called Super, which a innovative instant dessert. To produce said product, General Food would use the existing Jell-O agglomerator in manufacturing and must purchase new machinery and equipment costing $120,000 and perform building modifications for $80,000. It is early 1967 and Mr. Sanberg must decide whether or not to go through with the plans to begin the Super Project. Mr Sanberg developed three different options to evaluate the project: incremental basis (considers only incremental revenues, but fails to take into account the forgone opportunity cost of the Jell-O facilities), facilities used basis (incorrectly includes all overhead costs related to the facilities, when only the incremental overhead costs relating to the project should be considered), and fully allocated basis (correctly states overhead costs related to the project, but incorrectly includes overhead costs that are company-wide). Therefore, Mr. Sanberg’s assumptions are incorrect and as consultants, we will provide him with correct analysis.…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Risk Analysis Paper

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages

    While analyzing both potential proposals for investment, it was found that both companies had the potential for relatively the same NPV and IRR when taking into consideration the market research for both proposals. An important risk that would involved for both investment proposals would be the bias that can be created when…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chicago Value Company Case

    • 1136 Words
    • 5 Pages

    What is the project 's NPV? The Net Present Value is $36,955.09 Explain the economic rationale behind the NPV. Economists found much of their analyses on a marketplace where supply and demand are based on the perceptions of present value and scarcity. The Net Present Value (NPV) are calculations used to estimate the value over a lifetime which in this case would be of Chicago Valve 's standard petroleum valve systems. NPV allows decision makers to compare various alternatives on a similar time scale by converting all options to current dollar figures. Could the NPV of this particular project be different for Lone Star Petroleum Company than for one of Chicago Valve 's other potential customers? A project is deemed acceptable if the net present value is positive over the expected lifetime of the project.…

    • 1136 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    One financial goal of financial managers is to maximize the shareholders’ wealth. Therefore, merger and acquisition decisions should be consistent with shareholder wealth maximization, and financial characteristics of the targets to consider in the decision-making process. The net present value method is one of the useful methods that help financial managers to maximize shareholders’ wealth. The capital budgeting decision mergers Acquisitions…

    • 1391 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this situation, there will be three options to choose from. From a strictly financial standpoint, it is better to calculate the net present value of those…

    • 1440 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Finance Homework Ch 10

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages

    d. The net present value method (NPV) is generally regarded by academics as being the best single method for evaluating capital budgeting projects.…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    You work for the 3T company, which expects to earn at least 18 percent on its investments. You have to choose between two similar projects. Your analysts predict that inflation rate will be a stable 3 percent over the next 7 years. Below is the cash flow information for each project. Which of the two projects would you fund if the decision is based only on financial information? Why?…

    • 275 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Finance Value

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The basic definition for the net present value is the capital budgeting to see how successful a company or organization is. This particular technique is really used to make certain investments decisions when it comes to a certain project because it will give the accurate change in the value of the company when it chooses to take on certain objectives. What is meant by this is by estimating the present value of the project and expected profits from the project we can evenly compare the projects financial outlook and a sound decision can be made as to whether the project will be profitable for the company to consider taking on ("Net Present Value," n.d.) For example if Apex were to make an investment of $10,000 for a mission, and the reason we were making the investment in the beginning because we were expecting to get a positive cash flow of $2,000 over the next 4 years, and our base discounted price is 10%. Then if we were to use the NPV chart the answer for year 1 would be $188.20, and for year 2 it would be $3471, and for year 3 it would be $4973.80. The basic formula for NPV would be Y0: $10,000 Y1:$1818.20 Y2:$3471 NPV=$10,000+$1818.20+$3471=$263…

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays