Preview

Public sphere

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2044 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Public sphere
Outline the key features of Habermas’ public sphere. Discuss how healthy the public sphere is today, with reference to the forces of commerce and politics.
The focus point of this paper is to outline the key features of Jurgen Habermas’ public sphere while discussing how healthy the public sphere is today, with reference to the forces of commerce and politics. Jurgen Habermas’ concept of a public sphere is an area within social life that allows for a public opinion to be formed. First introduced in Habermas’ historical-sociological book that looks at the ‘emergence, transformation and disintegration of the bourgeois public sphere‘1, ‘Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit’ which was translated twenty-seven years later to ‘The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society’ To analyses the concept of the public sphere accurately, an understanding of the transgression of the concept from bourgeois public sphere to the modern day public sphere is imperative. During the eighteen hundreds, the idea of a public sphere was the utilization of public locations. Places such as coffee houses and salons where the bourgeois of society would discuss relevant social topics, that were normally highlighted in newspaper and journals such as The Tatler and The Spectator.
The criteria to be involved in the discussions resulted in inclusivity issues, as early on the only participates were composed of particular segments of the European population normally educated, literate and propertied men. This bourgeois public sphere excluded most of the working class, women and illiterate. Despite the difficulties of accurately researching historic literacy rates, it is thought that during the early years of the public sphere in the 17th century the literacy rate for males in the United Kingdom was roughly thirty percent, and it was much lower for women.2 The majority of the population did not participate in the public sphere until almost two centuries

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the early modern period, not only were women denied the most basic of natural rights in many countries, they were also regarded as intellectually inferior to men. As such, women were not accepted to the same schools as men and thus, women did not receive the same level of education that men had received (PWH, p.504). Marie Le Jars De Gournay…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the 17th century men were seen more independent than women. They were seen as more educated, they had more choices, I were not seen as a second class citizen if they slept around with lots of women and also they were aloud to have affairs with other people after marriage, but if women did so they were seen as scum and were treated like second…

    • 2031 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Obama's Club Summary

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The list is as follows: political socialization; power, authority, legitimacy, and capacity; public opinion; media; political elites; political parties; elections; campaigns; presidential powers; among others. Each of these themes is presented and further elaborated with specific examples within the book. The themes complement the information presented in class by adding more specificity and depth. For example, in class, we briefly discussed power, authority, legitimacy, and capacity. In much the same way, the book showed how the lines between these concepts are often blurred and misunderstood, leading to dissensions and hostilities between the public and the elite. However, the book often offered more nuanced theories and explanations for the development of these overarching motifs, through the use of detailed examples and…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The motivation behind this paper will be to explore Horkheimer and Adorno's evaluation of the enlightenment and Habermas' retort. Horkheimer and Adorno both prominent philosophers of the Frankfurt School of Marxist Critical Theory agree that “myth is already enlightenment, and enlightenment reverts to mythology”. Implying that the liner progression of the enlightenment has really uprooted its original aims. The notion is that by making man the sovereign of nature has really delivered inverse effects on social nature, which emerge in fascism and Stalinism. Habermas then challenges the focus of the enlightenment critiques of the time and the Norms that we have created that digress from the progression of the movement.…

    • 110 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Upper class men held the power in many governments, including England’s, while women were considered to be of a much lower social standing.…

    • 1119 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Contemporary Rhetorical Theory aligns most critically with Habermas’s ideals of the public sphere as it draws from, analyzes, and opens dialogue within civic life (It is important to note that I am not formatting an argument here, but to understand that they are the same. Indeed there are many separations between Habermas, critical theory, and contemporary rhetoric that could be disseminated). Civic life is concerned with community and nation rather than the privatized or institutionalized life. Contemporary Rhetorical Theory is the bridge between understanding human society and human communication, and civic engagement - which aims to develop community. This paper will examine the theory in a mass communication culture, agency, and the debate surrounding rhetorical theory in communication…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “according to Hobbes, is born political society. For the past 300 years, we have told ourselves a story in which humanity is a collection of rational self-seeking individuals; that society is the conflict of interests; that those conflicts are resolved by a central power given legitimacy by a social contract in which individuals recognize that it is in their interest to yield up part of their unfettered freedom; and that governments have emerged as the source of power through which conflicts are mediated.” (Hobbes, T., & Gaskin, J. C. A. (1998). Leviathan. Opposing Viewpoints.)…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wealth in the eighteenth century was unevenly distributed between the classes. The public sphere was not as “public” as the name suggests, for the lower class and women were excluded. The government holding most the wealth and power over the land would impose harsh taxes that kept the rich wealthy and the poor in the lower class. “It is impossible to say what place the two privileged orders ought to occupy in the social order: this is the equivalent of asking what place one wishes to assign to a malignant tumor that torments and undermines the strength of the body of a sick person” (Sieyes.) One could label the lower class as “the sick” due to the constant stream of vile virus they were fed in the form of taxes, inequality, and negligence. The lower class peasants made up the majority of the population while the middle and upper class was made up of literate people that had access to an education and knowledge. The lower class had a disadvantage which was that the majority did not know how to read or write. Peasants were seen as the herd and got…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Though originally an apprentice to Horkheimer and Adorno, Habermas’ was not entirely in agreement with the two theorists when it came to their views on the Enlightenment. He seemed to suggest that his mentors went too far in their examination, and he stressed that they gave scientific reason too much credit, choosing himself to base his arguments in the belief that human life and cognitive processes were stronger than simple scientific reasoning.…

    • 2817 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In contrast to the antique, the Middle Ages were less concerned about the role of citizens in a democracy. Rather than debating the values and pitfalls of civic participation, political philosophers, such as Machiavelli, contemplated the proper form of government and the role of rulers and subjects. However, the renaissance, reformation, and enlightenment revived old ideas of political involvement of the public. While views diverged on the matter, a resurgence of interest in democracy occurred. Themes and topics investigated ranged from the necessity of citizens participation as a protective measure of private property, as pointed out by Bentham, and to attain better outcomes, as put forth by Mill, to citizen apathy, an uniformed, uneducated…

    • 156 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Woman s suffrage

    • 996 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the nineteenth and twentieth centuries women were being oppressed by not being allowed to vote, this made them less “value” as compared to the male gender. The point of view concerning woman suffrage was greatly affected by the gender role and the political standing of the person in question. The female point of view as shown in documents 2, 4, 5, 7, 9 and 10 showed in favour of women’s right to vote and to stand in electoral office. While documents 1, 3, 6, 11 and 13 were against it, these documents were from a male point of view. Another bias in these documents was the political standing of person, generally male, documents like 1, 3, 6, 11, 12 and 13 theses views were very similar to the views of the males, their voting audience.…

    • 996 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    flaws of US democracy

    • 1784 Words
    • 8 Pages

    One of the central components of democracy is supposed to be open discussion and deliberation. In fact, Habermas argued that this is the foundation that a democracy should be built upon. In his writings, he goes in depth about the theory of communicative action, which explores the role of communication. It is used to achieve mutual understanding and he explains that in communicating with others we hope to reach a consensus. Carl Schmitt had the same idea and felt that discussion is a fundamental principle of democracy. Schmitt suggest that the essence of parliament is “public deliberation of argument and counterargument, public debate and public discussion (Schmitt 34)”. When members of parliament come together they should have open minds and be prepared to exchange rational arguments.…

    • 1784 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Habermas is one of the greatest representatives of contemporary modernism, but for him, modernism remains as a project that is incomplete. Only when the structures of inequality that lead to a distorted communication between social groups have been transformed into more humane and egalitarian institutions, can the full promise of modernism be realized. That is when free and open communication between social groups becomes possible in late modern society. He studied the conflicts within modern society, and his theory could be called the “theory of pathology of modernity” because he views modernity as being at a variance with itself (Ritzer, 2008). This statement by Habermas means that the rationality that has begun to characterize the social systems is different and in conflict with the rationality that characterizes the life-world.…

    • 1935 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    A generalist model was put forward by Hegel and Marx. Hegel regards civil society as an integral part of the market, state and legal framework that balances between private and public interests. Marx follows the same conceptualization of civil society, but he suggests that there is no balance between the private-public interests. For Marx, the bourgeois elite controls state and legal system, which automatically leads to the superiority of private interests over the public ones (Alexander 211-38). A minimalist model was elaborated by Gramsci and Habermas. Gramsci separates civil society from market and state. He calls it a site, where hegemony could be challenged and contested and where alternative conceptualizations of the political-economic system could develop. For Gramsci, civil society is a place of struggle over hegemony. Habermas describes civil society in similar terms, but he adds that it can mobilize citizens for social change and counter-hegemony. For Habermas, although civil society is autonomous of state and market, it is a product of interaction between market and state. It is composed of the intimate sphere, the sphere of associations, social movements and communication forms (J. Cohen and Arato 117-176). Irrespective of the position that civil society holds relative to state and market, it is by no means a single actor. Civil society is marked by a high degree of…

    • 4694 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Embodiment

    • 3084 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Brennen, B. (2006). Searching for the Sane Society, Erich Fromm’s Contributions to Social Theory, Javnost the Public. (13) 7- 16.…

    • 3084 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays

Related Topics