Public Policy in Bangladesh
Chapter One: Introduction
1.1 Background of the Study
Increasing global competition is changing the environment facing most companies today. As trade barriers fall and transaction costs decline, new global competitors are entering previously more isolated domestic markets. In response to this intensified competitive pressure, local companies are pushed to enhance performance by innovating and adopting process and product improvements. This domestic sector dynamic leads to higher productivity, which, in turn, can create sustainable competitive advantages for companies, as well as being the most important driver of job creation and per-capita income growth for the economy (Baily et al., 2005). Higher productivity is the synonym of improved competitiveness. Enterprises are competitive when their productivity of labor and all production factors grow consistently, which situation allows them to reduce the unit costs of their output, etc., but also affect other enterprises at the national and international levels. Higher productivity provides funding for an organization’s expansion plans. In the short term, citizens benefit from the better and cheaper products available on the market, and in the medium term from growing employment. Another effect is constant growth in wages in real terms. As a result, a country’s living standard goes up when its productivity growth (in macro-terms) is sustained. Therefore, an enterprise plays the primary role in generating revenues and employment, and contributes to a lasting and balanced economic and social development (Wysokińska, 2003). 1.2 Conceptualization
Increasing global competition is changing the environment facing most companies today. As trade barriers fall and transaction costs decline, new global competitors are entering previously more isolated domestic markets. In response to this intensified competitive pressure, local companies are pushed to enhance performance by innovating and adopting process and product
1.1 Background of the Study
Increasing global competition is changing the environment facing most companies today. As trade barriers fall and transaction costs decline, new global competitors are entering previously more isolated domestic markets. In response to this intensified competitive pressure, local companies are pushed to enhance performance by innovating and adopting process and product improvements. This domestic sector dynamic leads to higher productivity, which, in turn, can create sustainable competitive advantages for companies, as well as being the most important driver of job creation and per-capita income growth for the economy (Baily et al., 2005). Higher productivity is the synonym of improved competitiveness. Enterprises are competitive when their productivity of labor and all production factors grow consistently, which situation allows them to reduce the unit costs of their output, etc., but also affect other enterprises at the national and international levels. Higher productivity provides funding for an organization’s expansion plans. In the short term, citizens benefit from the better and cheaper products available on the market, and in the medium term from growing employment. Another effect is constant growth in wages in real terms. As a result, a country’s living standard goes up when its productivity growth (in macro-terms) is sustained. Therefore, an enterprise plays the primary role in generating revenues and employment, and contributes to a lasting and balanced economic and social development (Wysokińska, 2003). 1.2 Conceptualization
Increasing global competition is changing the environment facing most companies today. As trade barriers fall and transaction costs decline, new global competitors are entering previously more isolated domestic markets. In response to this intensified competitive pressure, local companies are pushed to enhance performance by innovating and adopting process and product
References: Aghion, P. and Howitt, P. (1992). A Model of Growth through Creative Destruction, Econometrica, vol. 2, pp. 323–351. Aghion, P., Harris, C., Howitt, P. and Vickers, J. (2001). Competition, Imitation and Growth with Step-by-Step Innovation, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 68, pp. 467–492. Brad,S. and D.B.A. (2003) Building Organizational Competencies for Competitive Advantages, Business Credit, 105 (2), 16-17. Baily, M.N., Farrell, D., Greenberg, E., Henrich, J.D., Jinjo, N., Jolles, M. and Remes, J.(2005). Increasing Global Competition and Labor Productivity: Lessons from the US Automotive Industry, Mckinsey Global Institute. Barseghyan, L. (2008). Entry Costs and Cross-Country Differences in Productivity and Output, Journal of Economic Growth, vol. 13, pp. 145–167. Carpinetti, L.C.R., Gerolamo, M.C. and Dorta, M. (2000). A Conceptual Framework for Deployment of Strategy-Related Continuous Improvements, The TQM Magazine, Vol. 12 No. 5, 340-9. Christopher, Martin (1998). Logistics and Supply Chain Management: Strategies for Reducing Cost and Improving Service, Second-Edition, Financial Times Prentice Hall. Cincera, M., and Galgau, O. (2005). Impact of Market Entry and Exit on EU Productivity and Growth Performance, Economic Papers, no. 222, European Economy, European Commission, Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs. Cole, H., Ohanian, L., Riascos, A. and Schmitz, J. (2005). Latin America in the Rearview Mirror, Journal of Monetary Economics, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 69–107. Fleury, A. and Fleury, M.T. 2003. Competitive strategies and core competencies: perspectives for the internationalization of industry in Brazil, Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 14(1), 16-25 Goldman,L., Nagel, R Griffith, R. and Harrison, R. (2004). The Link Between Product Market Reform and Macroeconomic Performance, no. 209. Hayes, R.H. and Wheelwright, S.C. (1984). Restoring Our Competitive Edge, Competing Through Manufacturing, Wiley, New York, NY. Kaplan, D., Piedra, E. and Seira, E. (2007). Entry regulations and Business Sgtart-Ups: Evidence from Mexico, Policy Research Working Paper. Lau, R.S.M. (2002). Competitive Factors and Their Relative Importance in the US Electronics and Computer Industries, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 22 (1), 125-35. Lee, Y.C. (2003). Total manufacturing information system: a conceptual model of a strategic tool for competitive advantage, Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 14/2,114-122. Leong, G.K., Snyder, D.L. and Ward, P.T. (1990). Research in the process and content of manufacturing strategy, Omega, 18 (2), 109-122. Loayza, N., Oviedo, and Serven, L. (2002). The Role of Policy and Institutions for Productivity and Firm Dynamics: Evidence from Micro and Industry Data, Working Papers, NO. 329, OECD Economics Department. Madu, C. (1999). Reliability and Quality Interface, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 16:7, 691-698. Madu, C. (2000). Competing Through Maintenance Strategies, International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 17:9, 937-948. Michael, P. (1985). Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. Free Press, New York. Nicoletti, G. and Scarpetta, S. (2003). Regulation, Productivity and Growth, Economic Policy, vol. 36, no. 18, pp. 11–72. Nickell, S. (1996). Competition and Corporate Performance, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 104, pp. 724–746. Ospina,S. and Schiffbauer, M (2010). Competition and Firm Productivity: Evidence from Firm-Level Data, Working Paper, WP/10/67, International Monetary Fund (IMF), IMF Institute. Phusavat, K Romer, P. (1986). Increasing Returns and Long-run Growth, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 94, no. 5, pp. 1002–1037. Syverson, C. (2011). What Determines Productivity?, Journal of Economic Literature, 49(2), 326-365. Schiantarelli, F Srivastava, V. (1996). Liberalization, Productivity and Competition (Delhi: Oxford University Press). Schroeder, R.G., Anderso, J. C. and Cleveland, G. (1986). The Content of Manufacturing Strategy: An Empirical Study, Journal of Operations Management, 6 (4), 405-15. Wheelwright, S.C. (1984). Manufacturing Strategy: Defining the Missing Link, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 5, 77-91. Ward, P., Duray, G.K., Leong, G.K. and Sum, C. (1995). Business environment, operations strategy, and performance: an empirical study of Singapore manufacturers, Journal of Operations Management, 13, 99-115. Wysokińska, Z. (2003). Competitiveness and Its Relationships with Productivity and Sustainable Development, Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe, Vol. 11, No. 3 (42)