Preview

Public Interest Litigation

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1560 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Public Interest Litigation
Public-Interest Litigation (PIL, or जनहित याचिका) is litigation for the protection of the public interest. In Indian law, Article 32 of the Indian constitution contains a tool which directly joints the public with judiciary. A PIL may be introduced in a court of law by the court itself (suo motu), rather than the aggrieved party or another third party. For the exercise of the court's jurisdiction, it is not necessary for the victim of the violation of his or her rights to personally approach the court. In a PIL, the right to file suit is given to a member of the public by the courts through judicial activism. The member of the public may be a non-governmental organization (NGO), an institution or an individual. The Supreme Court of India, rejecting the criticism of judicial activism, has stated that the judiciary has stepped in to give direction because due to executive inaction, the laws enacted by Parliament and the state legislatures for the poor since independence have not been properly implemented.
In December 1979, Kapila Hingorani of supreme court of India had filed a petition regarding the condition of the prisoners detained in the Bihar jail, whose suits were pending in the court. The special thing about this petiton was that it was not filed by any single prisoner, rather it was filed by various prisoners of the Bihar jail. The case got filed in the Supreme Court before the bench headed by Justice P. N. Bhagwati. This petition was filed by the name of the prisoner, Husnara Khatoon, hence the petition came to be known as Husnara Khatoon Vs State of Bihar. In this case, the Supreme Court upheld that the prisoners should get benefit of free legal aid and fast hearing. Because of this case 40,000 prisoners, whose suits were pending in the court, were released from the jail. There after many cases like this have registered in the supreme court.
The concept of Public Interest Litigation (PIL) is in consonance with the principles enshrined in Article 39A of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Retard

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages

    (d) The case: (12 marks) • What happened in this case? (1 mark) Summarise the facts. PLEASE BE CAREFUL NOT TO SIMPLY RE-WRITE OR RE-STATE THE FACTS. What is required is a BRIEF summary, in your own words. What was the decision in the case? (1 mark) Identify and explain the main legal issue or issues of the case in your own words. (10 marks) NOTE: this part of the question will require students to do some reading and to conduct some independent research beyond the case and beyond the prescribed textbook. Please see the attached Guidelines for this Assignment, as well as the Research Guidance Notes for Assignment 1 on Blackboard to help you with your research.) 3. Please include footnotes AND a bibliography (list of references at the end of your assignment). Please note footnotes and the bibliography will NOT be included in the word limit. NOTE: You should also refer to the Course Outline (section 4) regarding Assessment Format (paragraph 4.3), Assignment Submission Procedure (paragraph 4.4) and penalty for late submission (paragraph 4.5).…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Citizens United Case

    • 1758 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Although corporations are comprised of individuals, it is highly debated if corporations deserve the same rights that the Constitution grants each American citizen. The First Amendment gives each citizen equal opportunity to pursue his or her own ambitions in coalition with their great nation. In the Citizens United v. Federal Election Committee case No. 08-205, the Supreme Court validated the idea of political spending as free speech and abolished the ban on corporate political spending. Corporations are imperative to an industrialized society, but they should not have the right to control political decisions, especially when they are motivated by selfish and monetary reasons. Corporate speech involves individual speech, but it does not have the human voice. The Bill of Rights was drafted to protect the rational freedoms of an actual human voice.…

    • 1758 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Citizens United

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Almost a century ago, back to the time when the modern corporation was created, sprung the Progressive era that flourished with political reforms and social activism. Along with the corporations also came laws that have always prohibited or limited the use of corporate money in elections as a result of Progressive reform’s efforts to eliminate social and political problems, especially corruption. These specific laws have been in place up until January 21, 2010 during the landmark case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, when the Supreme Court ruled with a 5-4 majority that the government may not ban political spending by corporations in candidate elections. As a result, the court also overruled its 1990 case Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce, which upheld restrictions on corporate spending to support or oppose political candidates, and partially overruled the 2003 case McConnell v. Federal Election Commission, which upheld the part of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 that restricted campaign spending by corporations and unions. The case formed when prior to the 2008 primary elections, Citizens United, a nonprofit corporation produced a 90 minute documentary entitled Hillary: The Movie. The movie conveyed opinions about whether Hillary Clinton, a candidate for the Democratic presidential nomination, was fit for the presidency. However, The Movie falls within the definition of "electioneering communications" under the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002, a federal act designed to prevent "big money" from wrongly influencing federal elections-which, as well as other things, prohibits corporate financing of "electioneering communications" and enforces “mandatory disclosure and disclaimer requirements on such communications.” The District Court for the District of Columbia denied Citizens United's preliminary injunction motion to enjoin the Federal Election Commission ("FEC") from enforcing these provisions of the Bipartisan Campaign…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    [ 16 ]. Ankita Rustogi, ‘The Right to Bail under Indian Criminal Procedure Law’ (2009) Social Science Research Network 9. .…

    • 5042 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Country Analysis- India

    • 2413 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Srikrishna, B. N. (2008) "The Indian Legal System," International Journal of Legal Information: Vol. 36: Iss.2, Article 8. Available at: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/ijli/vol36/iss2/8…

    • 2413 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Judicial Redress

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In view of the operations by the courts on a wider canvas of judicial review, a potent weapon was forged by the Supreme Court by way of public interest litigation (PIL) also known as social action litigation. The Supreme Court has ruled that where judicial redress is sought in respect of a legal injury or a legal wrong suffered by persons, who by reason of their poverty or disability are unable to approach the court for enforcement of their fundamental rights, any member of the public, acting bona fide can maintain an action for judicial redress. Thus, the underprivileged and the downtrodden have secured access to court through the agency of a public-spirited person or organization. This weapon was effectively used by the Supreme Court and…

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Public Complaint

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The article descript that the officers of the Dallas Police Department feel the special unit’s regular reviews of dash-cam video from patrol cars are being nitpicky with disciplinary action for minor infractions such as speeding. Within the 11 months of operation, the unit reviewed the dash-cam videos and they found numerous examples of officers exceeding the department’s speed requirements, failing to turn on their lights and sirens or failing to stop at stop signs or red lights during chases or when responding to other emergency calls. Many of these violations were against department policy and they were disciplined.…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Public Law

    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages

    ▪Compensation- One who has caused injury to another must make good the damage whether he was at fault or not. Ethical compensation.…

    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Citizens United

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision stated that corporations, like people, have a right to free speech, and that the spending money in campaigns is a form of expression, so the result was that it took down regulations against corporations spending money on advertisements directly for and against candidates. The court did not act accordingly to Rawls because I will argue that his concept of restrictions and regulations placed on liberties, so that everyone has a fair and equal scheme of liberties is violated. I agree with Rawls that courts decision is wrong because, I do not agree that corporations should have the same rights as people. Moreover, the courts decision ultimately undermines the whole democratic structure that is in place and supports the rule of the rich because those with unlimited spending for campaigns, will be able to buy elections.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Business Law

    • 2605 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Explain the principles of law relevant to that issue with reference to authority (cases and/or legislation)…

    • 2605 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Public Interest

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages

    To claim to hold the public interest is to claim something big. The ambiguity that arises from such a broad concept almost always means that it will have great, and sometimes detrimental, consequences. Because it is a sort of a “je ne sais quoi” (Sorauf – p. 623) of American politics, it is a strong but malleable tool that can be used by anyone who has the audacity to give it a meaning.…

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Case Study: Bachan Singh

    • 3781 Words
    • 16 Pages

    (C.K. Thakker and Lokeshwar Singh Panta, JJ.) Bachan Singh ------------------ Appellant v. Union of India & Ors. -------------- Respondent(s) Civil Appeal No. 3110 of 2004, decided on July 10, 2008 The judgment of the Court was delivered by Lokeshwar Singh Panta, J. Bachan Singh - appellant is aggrieved by the judgment and order dated February 5, 2002 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir at Jammu allowing the LPA (SW) No. 284/97 filed by the respondents herein against the judgment dated November 20, 1996 of the learned Single Judge of the High Court whereby the learned Single Judge allowed SWP No. 14-A/1984 filed by the appellant and quashed the General Court-Martial held against him including confirmation of sentence passed upon him by the General Court-Martial and the appellant is relegated back to the position he had on the date of passing of the order with all the benefits under the Rules. A General Court-Martial (GCM) under the Army Act, 1950 (for short `the Act') was convened by the competent authority on January 4, 1982 under Section 109 of the Act to try the appellant holding the rank of Sepoy in Second Batallion, the Dogra Regiment in the Army. The allegations against the appellant for which he was suspected to be tried by GCM were:"No.3973649A Sep Bachan Singh of 2DOGRA is resident of village Paragwal, Tehsil Akhnoor, District Jammu (J&K) S/o Shri Dharam Singh and step son of Smt. Gyano Devi, second wife of Shri Dharam Singh. Sep. Bachan Singh studied in Govt. Lower High School, Paragwal upto the 9th. He was enrolled in the Army on 11 Oct. 75 to Meerut in the Dogra Regt. He is married to Smt. Veena Kumari D/o Shri Durga Singh resident of Village Chargarwar, Tehsil Jammu, District Jammu (J&K). Sep Bachan Singh proceeded on annual leave w.e.f. 16 Jan 80 to 15 Mar 80 to his home station village Paragwal, Tehsil Akhnoor. Shri Bachan Singh S/o Shri Waryam Singh resident of…

    • 3781 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The economic activities of the individuals and artificial persons are the basis of welfare of any state. It leads to the formation of public and legal relations which come into existence in the process of executing such activities. At the same time it must be admitted that these relations never carried smooth temper as there is always a probability for arising a dispute so far as private interests can be infringed. Most of the conflicts can be settled by the parties on compromise basis but some of them are still remaining unsolved. There are different reasons such as clash of opinions or failure to understand one another. In that case the participant of the conflict, who is of opinion that his rights are infringed, most likely will take prompt action to be rehabilitated by force of the court decision.…

    • 6070 Words
    • 25 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Sabarimala ban case, delineates the complex and delayed justice delivery mechanism in the Supreme Court resulting in the subversion of the very motive of “justice”, as popularly quoted, “justice delayed is Justice denied”.…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Tax Case

    • 3084 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Chief Justice M. Hameedullah Beg., Justice N. L. Untwalia, Justice P. N. Bhagwati, Justice P. S. Kailasam, Justice S. Murtaza Fazal Ali, Justice V. R. Krishna Iyer and Justice Y. V. Chandrachud.…

    • 3084 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays