Preview

Psychology - Forensic Investigation

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
744 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Psychology - Forensic Investigation
COGNITIVE INTERVIEW
MILNE & BULL (2006): Crucial to any criminal investigation is information provided by witnesses & victims of crime. * Information is the lifeblood of investigations and it is the ability of investigators to obtain useful & accurate information from witnesses that is most crucial. * Police officers are tasked with the gathering of witness/victim info by way of an interview. * Thus, an officer’s ability to conduct an effective interview is a significant component of any investigation & one which is likely to influence both quality & quantity of info gained. * In attempting to improve eyewitness testimony, researchers have concentrated on improving interview methods.
COGNITVE INTERVIEW * To date the most systematic method of improving eyewitness memory is a technique known as COGNITIVE INTERVIEW, developed by Geiselman & Fisher. * Multidisciplinary forensic interview technique concerned exclusively with retrieval of info from memory. * Memon (2000): described as “ one of the most exciting developments in psychology in the last 10 years” * - In the early 1980s in response to requests by American police Investigators & other legal professionals for a method of improving witness memory Ed. Geiselman & Ron.Fisher developed CI procedure.
GEISELMAN & FISHER: Argued that a successful technique for improving Testimony should have 3 characteristics: 1. Reliably increase accurate recall 2. Technique is used, confidence should be related to accuracy 3. Practical, applied value; possible train police officers to use it & for it to be successful in real-life forensic investigations.
Initially presented in 1984, the CI Procedure evolved over several years with further refinements & enhancements being reported in subsequent papers. The initial procedure is referred to as CI & the latter as Enhanced CI.
ORIGINAL COGNITIVE INTERVIEW * Based on original

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Where there are suspicions that a crime may have taken place, the police should be contacted immediately and physical, forensic and other evidence should be preserved.…

    • 38861 Words
    • 156 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    R V Fraser Case Study

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages

    When a crime is reported to police, they have to gather enough information to make an arrest and sustain charges to be proven in court, beyond reasonable doubt.…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    team c week 4 summary

    • 406 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Team c will review slides 48 to 142 of the Eyewitness Evidence: A Guide for Law Enforcement slide show on the National Criminal Justice Reference Service website. The team will discuss the best practices to be used by police when conducting suspect identifications.…

    • 406 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unit1 Forensics

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages

    8.) They need to have as much information as possible about the place because they should be aware of all the materials around the scene that could affect the crime scene. They should be aware of all the surroundings in that area.…

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    2. Photographs would be most useful to crime investigators because they can refer back to what was at the crime scene and what everything looked like and where it was.…

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. It is important to use proper methods while collecting evidence from a crime scene because evidence is extremely important in solving a crime, and improper collection could corrupt the entire investigation. Evidence may become contaminated if proper methods are not used, which could severely effect analysis outcomes. Additionally, specific procedures must be followed for evidence to be used in a court room. Therefore, it is extremely important to gather evidence with proper methods in order for that evidence to be useful in a court of law.…

    • 625 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The information gathered is from the interviewer and the family’s perspectives, other interested parties and records from the police.…

    • 2505 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Osterburg, J. W., & Ward, R. H. (2014). Criminal Investigation: A method for reconstructing the past.…

    • 308 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1.06 Review

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. Why do you think it is so important to use proper methods when collecting evidence from a crime scene?…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This further illustrates that police officers can use multiple tactics other than simple questioning such as deception, a list of narratives, and open-ended questions. Suspects might admit that committing the crime for multiple reasons including mental illness, desire for attention, and to protect loved ones. Corroborated and nonpublic facts are based on police not disclosing facts to the public and how the confessions can be contaminated through the police or expert evidence can all lead to false confessions (Garrett,…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Courtroom Matrix

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages

    | To tell the police and the prosecution everything that he or she knows from the incident.…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Explain how such strategies are related to memory research. Define the term eye witness testimony Explain some of the factors that affect the accuracy of EWT. Describe the impact of misleading information…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The author David Simon writes an informative article on the topic of a homicide unit in Baltimore. He writes this to let the citizens of Baltimore know how interrogation works. His book, Homicide: A Year on the Killing Streets gives us a very detailed view on this. Homicide detectives work hard to get information out of suspects. They like to give their suspects a false hope of becoming free if they give up the info. They call this hope an imaginary window, an escape hatch in which they might be able to crawl out of. When done correctly the detectives can get all the information they need from the person. The guiltiest person is constantly the first person looking for an out; after all, if you’re not guilty what are you scared of? The interrogation is closely related to a performance, it that helps the detectives get “common ground” with his suspects when non-exist. When a suspect gets comfortable, he/she is more likely to talk. This “performance” is highly important because in Baltimore, a…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Picking Cotton

    • 1915 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In the case of Jennifer Thompson, she prepared for the fight and was determined not to be murdered by her rapist. As she cleared her mind, Jennifer tried to memorize every facial feature or distinct markings on her rapist. She wanted to make sure she encoded everything she was seeing and hearing from her assailant, but what happens when other factors alter your memories. Things such as unconscious transference, weapon focus, cross race bias or how the eye witness was questioned can play a big factor on how memories are recalled from the eye witness. These factors played a big role in Ronald Cotton’s sentencing and cost him 11 agonizing years in prison. Many believe that once we encode something in our minds it is there for ever and there is nothing that can alter or change our memory of the event, but we are wrong. Like in the case of Jennifer Thompson, she was so positive that Ronald Cotton was her assailant, she had identified him in a photo line up after describing him to a Forensic Sketch artist, and again identified him in a line up. During these two occasions, the officer’s in the case gave Jennifer assured her that she was doing great. This gave Jennifer more reassurance and confidence that she had chosen the right man, but she had not. Previous studies on post identification feedback show that “witnesses who received confirming feedback (versus no feedback) as having paid more attention, having had a better view, being better able to identify strangers, and being more confident at the time of the identification.” (Douglass et. al., 2010, p. 287). Thus Jennifer’s second and third time around identifying Ronald Cotton as her rapist…

    • 1915 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Kamira, J. (2002). Revisiting the Interview - Cognitive Interviewing and Communication for General Duties Police. (In Print.)…

    • 2876 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays