Preview

Ps/537-544 Chapter 4

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
610 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ps/537-544 Chapter 4
Guided Reading 19.2 freedom of religion
On your own paper, answer the following questions as you read Chapter 19, Section 2 (Pgs 537-544)
You do not have to write the question so long as you staple the questions to your answer sheet when finished.
1. What does the Due Process clause of in the 14th Amendment do?
2. What does the Establishment Clause set up?
3. List 3 examples of how the Government has encouraged churches and religion in the U.S.
4. What is a parochial (pear O key al) school?
5. The largest number of Establishment Clause cases involved what?
6. Why was “released time” upheld in Zorach v. Clauson, but not in McCollum v. Board of Education?
7. Which laws were found unconstitutional in Kentucky and Rhode Island?
8. To sum up the rulings, public schools can’t do what? But, individuals can do what?
…show more content…
Explain the law which was ruled unconstitutional in Edwards v. Agullard.
10. List two reasons why some people believe its ok for the gov’t to give aid/money to parochial schools.
11. What 3 conditions must exists for a program giving aid to go to parochial schools to pass the lemon test?
12. Can money be given to religious schools to pay for standardized testing and teacher salaries?
13. Why was the tax deduction in Minnesota upheld?
14. Of the 3 seasonal display cases, what was different about the Allegheny case? (hint: content and location)
15. Why are prayers in the legislature allowed, but prayers in public schools aren’t?
16. Why was it decided that the Ten Commandments displayed at the Texas State Capitol were acceptable?
17. What is the Free Exercise Clause
18. What are the 3 limitations of the Free Exercise Clause?
19. Which court case involved the pledge of allegiance and what was the final

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    DOUGLAS: said the intrusion of the government into the running of non-public schools through grants and other funding creates the entanglement that the Establishment Clause prohibits and that non-secular schools are so thoroughly governed by religion that any amount of public funding supports those doctrines, and is therefore against the constitution.…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    lemon vs kurtzman digest

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Rhode Island's 1969 Salary Supplement Act provides for a 15% salary supplement to be paid to teachers in nonpublic schools at which the average per-pupil expenditure on secular education is below the average in public schools. Eligible teachers must teach only courses offered in the public schools, using only materials used in the public schools, and must agree not to teach courses in religion. A three-judge court found that about 25% of the State's elementary students attended nonpublic schools, about 95% of whom attended Roman Catholic affiliated schools, and that to date about 250 teachers at Roman Catholic schools are the sole beneficiaries under the Act. The court found that the parochial school system was "an integral part of the religious mission of the Catholic Church," and held that the Act fostered "excessive entanglement" between government and religion, thus violating the Establishment Clause. Pennsylvania's Nonpublic Elementary and Secondary Education Act, passed in 1968, authorizes the state Superintendent of Public Instruction to "purchase" certain "secular educational services" from nonpublic schools, directly reimbursing those schools solely for teachers' salaries, textbooks, and instructional materials. Reimbursement is restricted to courses in specific secular subjects, the textbooks and materials must be approved by the Superintendent, and no payment is to be made for any course containing "any subject matter expressing religious teaching, or the morals or forms of worship of any sect." Contracts were made with schools that have more than 20% of all the students in the State, most of which were affiliated with the Roman Catholic Church. The complaint challenging the constitutionality of [p603] the Act alleged that the church-affiliated schools are controlled by religious organizations, have the purpose of propagating and promoting a particular religious faith, and conduct their operations to fulfill that purpose. A…

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The landmark Sheff v. O’Neill Connecticut Supreme Court decision will have a dramatic effect on the state of education in the great state of Connecticut. The de-facto segregation of Connecticut public schools over several years has been a troubling trend that has ultimately led to the decision reached by the court. The low performance of schools in the Hartford area has been a concern of many parents and educators. A child’s education is the most valuable tool a child can receive to prepare themselves for the world. The people of Connecticut must recognize the impact that failing schools can have on the entire state. The people in the Connecticut General Assembly and yourself must act to ensure each child has a chance at fulfilling their God given talents. However, I do not believe the Connecticut Supreme Court was correct in saying that it is the…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At times in schools, there could be disagreements and disputes between the decisions of government and the rights of individuals. Students attend school in order to become well-educated young adults. The schoolteacher’s main objective is to make sure that students are receiving the maximum amount of learning to prepare them for future endeavors. Schools educate students on citizenship and what it means to live in a democracy. Public schools are under the Bill of Rights and the Fourteenth Amendment, which gives citizens protection of their individual liberties from governmental interference. Public school officials must obey the demands of the Constitution. The Supreme Court ruled in the 1943 case West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette…

    • 1428 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Do you think that the decision of separate church and state was a good idea? Why or why not?…

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Nicholson, the “Lemon Test” is used to determine when a law or policy has the effect of establishing religion. The test consists of three prongs: the 1st prong is used to determine the school board’s intent in introducing the statement, the 2nd prong asks whether the action promotes or prohibits religion, and finally the 3rd prong addresses whether an action creates excessive “entanglement” between church and state. The Lemon Test is the logical criteria used by the Supreme Court to Decide Lemon V. Kurtzman, 403 U.S. 602(1971). This case involved laws in Pennsylvania and Rhode Island that permitted public funds to go to church related schools. The funds were allocated to pay teacher’s salaries partial and to provide instructional materials to help educate students and the books that were needed for the classroom. If the states decided to use the public money for parochial school, this created an entanglement between religion and government. Under the ruling of Krutzman v. Lemon, teachers who only taught secular subjects using only materials available in the regular public schools could be eligible to receive public funds and keep their jobs.…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I would like to propose a change to the current Ontarian policy in which catholic schools are a hundred percent governmentally funded, I am proposing that either all religion based schools get funded or none of them should. This policy is clearly biased against other faith-based schools. Ontario is the only province in Canada which funds Catholics schools only among the different religious based schools. Other provinces across the country either partially fund all the faith based schools or none of them altogether (Gillespie). This is a great disadvantage to those parents of other religion who may want to send their children to faith based school because while the parents who chooses to send their children to a catholic school do not have to pay for their child’s tuition, the parents who chooses to send their children to either Islamic, Jewish, Hindu, or another religion have to pay between two hundred to over five hundred dollars a month. All of these parents are required to pay taxes however only the catholic parents are having their children’s education paid for. It is inconceivable how a democratic government does not see the discrimination with funding one region’s school and not other religions’ schools. The Ontarian government argues that funding catholic schools has been rooted in our history (Gillespie), referring to the nineteenth century when most individuals would either be classified as a catholic or a protestant (one school), which is why this law was widely accepted. I argue that the times have changed; Canada has become immensely diverse since the nineteenth century, there are many religions that are now being practiced throughout Canada. It is unconstitutional to grant certain rights to one religion and not others. In conclusion I am proposing that the Ontarian government either grants equal funding to all faith based schools or does not fund any faith based schools, so as to protect and practice equality of…

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Zelman V. Simmons-Harris

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The case of Zelman v. Simmons-Harris is a landmark case that dealt with vouches for schooling and the 1st Amendment. The case was officially decided upon on June 27, 2002, but the case and history dates back to 1995. In 1995, the Ohio Legislature passed into law the Cleveland Scholarship and Tutoring Program as part of the 1995 budget act. The Cleveland Scholarship and Tutoring Program was a pilot program that gave families up $2,250 to support their children’s academics. Aid was given to parents according to financial need, and where the aid was spent depended upon where parents chose to enroll their children. Parents were able to opt out of the public school system with this money if they were a part of a failing school district. It allowed parents to choose the school that their children would attend. (Bodwell, 2003)…

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Clarence Thomas was the Chief Justice when the case came before the court. The decision was five votes for the Board of Education and four votes against them. William Rehnquist, Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy, Clarence Thomas and Stephen Breyer voted majority. John Paul Stevens, Sandra Day O’Connor, David Souter and Ruth Ginsburg voted minority. The court ruled that the policy reasonably served the school districts important interest in detecting and preventing drug use among its students and is constitutional. They said that students in extracurricular activities had a diminished expectation of privacy and that the policy furthered an important interest of the school in preventing drug use among students. The court said the Board of Education’s method of obtaining urine samples and…

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    School Conflict Case Study

    • 3298 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Since public schools are supported by public taxes, some believe that church and state must be kept separate.…

    • 3298 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Prayer in public schools has been overlooked for many years now and should be reconsidered. There are many pros about having prayer in public school and these are just a few. There are also some cons, but the pros always seem to outweigh the cons. “We need kids spending more time on their reading and writing, along with math — not mumbling prayers.” says Roger Simon, Chicago columnist. Although this is a con, the students would never be forced to pray, it is simply an option, an opinion. Bringing it back can be very convenient for the teachers and kids because it makes them feel bona…

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Different School Systems

    • 947 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The first reason against the the funding of Catholic schools is that it goes against our protected Charter of Rights and Freedoms. In charter section 15 it states that “Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and in particular without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, color, religion....”. This means if Catholic schools are funded by the government, why shouldn’t other religious based school be funded as well? The justification of section 15 (2) cannot be…

    • 947 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Informal Fallacies

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages

    We should favor extending federal aid to parochial schools and violating thereby the First Amendment regarding the separation of Church and State. You should let your Congressman know where you stand.…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    formation of malaysia

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Constitution is a document that contains all of the order of rules and regulations constitute an important policy for removing a country's governance and administration. Determining the constitution of the Kingdom,a form of government and the rights of the people.…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Origin of Rice of Ebaloy

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages

    4. What is the rationale of the DepED for its exclusion policy on private schools operating without permit in the NAT administration?…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays