Preview

Pros And Cons Of Tort Reform

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
624 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pros And Cons Of Tort Reform
Tort Reform Legislation The Seventh Amendment to the United States Constitution provides for the right to a jury trial in certain civil lawsuits. The proponents of tort reform legislation believe that in recent past there have been abuses in the civil justice system that need to be limited. In contrast, the opponents of the legislation believe that access to courts in order to seek remedy when deliberately or negligently harmed is vital for safeguarding individual rights. Opponents also believe that these rights have been under attack by interests of bug businesses over the past few decades. As evident in this seeming controversy, tort reform is associated with various advantages and disadvantages that contribute to differences in opinion. Moreover, there are concerns on whether federal tort reform legislation has gone too far or has been necessary in restraining frivolous and costly lawsuits. …show more content…
Nonetheless, critics have constantly argued that some aspects of contemporary tort law encourage various trivial and unfounded lawsuits. The differences in opinion about tort reform are attributed to its advantages and disadvantages and impact. One of the advantages is that it carries out an important function by making it possible for injured parties to receive compensation (Miller, 2010, p.72). Secondly, tort reform lessens the number of lawsuits by helping to ensure that companies and organizations involved in the case are not subjected to additional punitive damages. Third, as a result of the decrease in the number of lawsuits, judges have more time to focus on other cases. The fourth advantage is that tort reform helps in lessening courts’ expenditures because of the decline in the number of personal injury lawsuits or

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Law/421 Final

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages

    6) Under the U.S. legal system, subject to some exceptions, costs of litigation regarding both the plaintiff and defendant…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Have you ever followed a court case and been astonished at the outcome and the damages awarded in the case? I believe we have all heard about cases where the plaintiff is awarded a very large sum of money for a case that appears not to warrant the award. Most of these scenarios take place in cases where the tort law applies. According to authors Kubasek, Brennan and Browne (2009), tort law is defined as injury that to a person or their property. Tort law is primarily a state law and stipulations can vary. Tort law was put in place to encourage civility, discourage people and companies from private retaliation and to compensate innocent people who are injured due to the wrongful act of a person or company. According to The Legal Environment of Business A Critical Thinking Approach, there are different types of damages awarded in relation to tort cases. These damages are nominal, which is usually awarded when the plaintiff has not suffered serious damage, compensatory, which include general and special damages, and punitive damages. Punitive damages are usually intended to punish defendants and often go beyond simply compensating the plaintiff. (Kubasek et al.,2009)…

    • 3046 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Dodd-Frank Reform The financial crisis of 2008 created one of the most uncertain times in the United States’ economy history. Not only did it affect thousands of businesses, but also consumer’s confidence dropped to levels not seen since the great depression. After the failure to address the issues created by the banks, the economy took a turn for the worse. The only way to move the economy forward was to bailout those banks and businesses that were essential to the US economy.…

    • 1644 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The legal issues presented in this film are as follows: the effects of the media on citizens to ridicule lawsuits such as Stella Liebeck’s, the effects of limiting the amount of money that can be awarded by a jury in damages to the plaintiff otherwise known as caps on damages, such as the case of Colin Gourley, the corporations’ influence and power in judicial elections as well as the extent they will go to as experienced by Oliver Diaz, and the effects of mandatory arbitration in the work place, battled by Jamie Leigh Jones, as well as in consumers’ lives. All of these issues are presented to the viewer in order to prove an overall point of tort reform. Tort reform should be questioned and researched by citizens the film suggests, by encouraging a…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tort Reform Case Study

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “Tort reform is legislature usually passed at the state level which affects the malpractice laws of a state. Tort reform usually includes laws that limit, or cap, the amount of money that patients can receive as an award from a clinician they've sued for malpractice. Additionally, tort reform caps the amount of punitive damages a judge can order the physician to pay” (Santiago 2014)…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Reasearch Tote Case

    • 3071 Words
    • 13 Pages

    The law defines a “frivolous” lawsuit as “presenting no debatable question” to the court. The tort cases Liebeck verses McDonalds and Pearson verses Chung were both highly publicized cases that were coined as “frivolous” lawsuits that have a negative impact on the economy and the way we conduct ourselves in society. According to Phillip Howard, Chairman of Common Goods, a legal reform coalition, Tort claims cost the country hundreds of billions of dollars per year and they are changing our behavior and culture (Pearle, 2007).…

    • 3071 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the society we live in, it has become increasingly popular and more common to sue. Whether we see it in the media, talk about it amongst ourselves, or are actually the ones doing the suing, (or being sued) we deal with lawsuits every day. Now, we've all heard the story about the grandmother who spilled hot coffee on herself and successfully sued McDonald's for nearly $2.9 million, or the man who sued Winnebago and won $1.75 million after crashing his motor home off the freeway. But few of us ever question what these and all the other outrageous rewards for senseless lawsuits do to the economy. Have we ever wondered if they have a negative effect? Have we asked ourselves how they impact us, as consumers? Have we asked how they impact American…

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although this did not cure all issues surrounding the courts and right of the accused, it did make it harder for citizens to be treated cruelly through due process. There are still many court cases today that seem unconstitutional to the eyes of citizens. In some cases, people are discriminated against or profiled based off of stereotypes, which leads to a bias when a jury comes to rule the defendant as innocent or guilty. In other cases in the past, there is not even a jury of peers…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On 7th Amendment

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Martin Luther King Jr. once said “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.” Imagine being put into a situation where someone is in complete and utter control of your future and the severity of it. Now pretend they also are going to make it as severe as possible either because you are from a poor family, you have different religious or political views, or someone bribed them to make it as harsh as possible for you. This obviously is not fair and would cause any rational person to rebel against the system put in place for them; that is exactly what the colonists did when King George III took away the colonists’ right to trial by jury. Colonists knew the importance of the 7th Amendment because it prevented judicial bias and allowed…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tort Reform In Texas

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Before 1975 Texas was considered to be a complete quagmire of judicial mumbo-jumbo. The state’s system of justice allowed for laws to be applied arbitrarily. Enforcement of personal property rights and contracts varied depending on which local court had the case. Moreover, several counties that had bad reputations notwithstanding the court. Judicial outcomes often depended on which attorney was before which judge in which county. Equal enforcement of the state’s laws was simply not a certainty upon which a citizen could rely. In the early most attempts at tort reform in the State of Texas, a well-respected University of Texas Law School professor was asked to spearhead a commission and make recommendations on how to fix the those judicial inequalities.…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Tort Reform

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Tort reform can do nothing but hurt the average person in America who has suffered an injury due to the negligence of another. There are thousands of cases of experiences where babies have suffered brain injury due to medical negligence, workers have lost limbs because of faulty machinery, construction injury occurs as the result of defective equipment, and spinal injury has occurred due to faulty seat belts or defective tires. I could really go on and on with more stories about badly injured consumers who are forced to shoulder the high costs of medical mistakes in order to provide cheaper malpractice insurance for doctors who have made such medical errors. This would sadly take all day, which is hard to believe that this has gone so far. To me it just doesn’t seem right it makes the average American second guess there trip to the doctor or even just to get a cup of coffee. I like to feel safe, and Tort…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Brill Torts Outline

    • 12012 Words
    • 49 Pages

    a. Definition—(1) voluntary acts for the purpose of causing [the essential element of the tort] OR (2) voluntary acts with knowledge to a substantial certainty that [the essential element of the tort] will result.…

    • 12012 Words
    • 49 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jury trial guarantees were strengthened in the 6th, 7th, 8th, and 9th Amendments. These amendments, as well as a few more provide a stronger evidence of liberty being granted by the Constitution to the people. Perhaps the clearest example lies in the words of the very first amendment.…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In my opinion, Tort reform will benefit both the patients and the medical practitioners, but it is more favorable for clinicians and health providers. It will benefit the patients because of its promised to reduced health care cost and better health care access. Tort reform has the potential to attract more physicians to continue their practice. According to the report, through tort reform, patients have greater access to specialists in high-risk fields of medicine, and more emergency room doctors are willing to be on call because their fears of lawsuits have been reduced (Roser, 2012). In the article title “Tort Reform Is Associated with Significant Increases in Texas Physicians Relative to the Texas Population”, states that after Texas Implemented…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Essay On Tort Reform

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages

    It is all about personal viewpoints. All it takes is one misunderstood detail to blow a case out of proportion. Reporters use facts from cases that can be interpreted in many different ways. These humorous and minute details are used to get publicity and are tarnishing the reputation of civil lawsuits. Lawsuits are very beneficial for the relationship between consumers and companies. It lets the companies know what consumers do and do not want from their company. There is a definite need for the tort reform, but no need to get rid of civil lawsuits all together. Putting caps on rewards should be enough. Getting rid of civil lawsuits would only anger the public. Every citizen has the right to speak his or her mind, even if it may seem petty. Being able to speak their mind is important to most people in society these days. If people received less in punitive damages, but were at least able to continue to file lawsuits, then there should not be that big of an issue. With having the tort reform, a large amount of money could be saved. There are a ton of other strategies to help the justice system save money. Taking out civil lawsuit could save money, but would hurt the economy in many other ways. Limiting lawsuits is not the answer to saving the economy…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays