Preview

Pros And Cons Of The Quarantine Debate

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
265 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pros And Cons Of The Quarantine Debate
In an argument that perhaps dates back to the founding of America, the debate over whether personal liberties or the welfare of the public takes precedent continues to rage on. This debate has taken form in many debates, from the Massachusetts smallpox outbreak in 1901, which sparked argument over whether the state should force people to be vaccinated against the disease to protect the welfare of the public, or if the personal liberty of Massachusetts residents was more important. This debate has emerged again recently as the nation debates what to do with healthcare workers returning from treating Ebola patients in Africa: quarantine them to eliminate the risk of transmission, or allow them to go about their lives? The debate quickly became heated as strict quarantine laws were imposed largely based on the panic and hysteria Ebola brought about after the world witnessed tens of thousands of deaths in Africa and around the world.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    B. For Public Health, there are laws that prevent contagious diseases epidemics or people with potentially dangerous mental diseases.…

    • 1445 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Jessica Tice 10/10/17 Dear Dr. Concerned, In response to your questions about the rights of public health officials, I find that there are a great many details to consider. As I am sure you are aware, the United States Supreme Court decision in 1905 on the Jacobson v. Massachusetts case set a legal precedent in situations such as these. The ruling stated that the Board of Health had the right to require citizens to receive vaccinations in order to control a spreading smallpox epidemic . Legally, this supports the rights of you and your colleagues at the CDC to do what you deem necessary to protect public health, even if it may infringe upon the personal liberties of citizens.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Most importantly, the 1905 Jacobsen v. Massachusetts was a Supreme Court case whereby the Court upheld the ultimate states’ authority to impose compulsory vaccination laws. It articulated that an individual’s freedom should at times be subjected to the states’ police power and subordinated to the collective public welfare. The Court decision in the case elicited numerous questions regarding the state government’s power to safeguard the public's health, as well as the protection of personal liberty as enshrined in the Constitution. The Court also articulated that the states had the authority to protect its citizens from dangers of diseases for their own good, which necessitated the enforcement of the compulsory vacation laws (NCBI, 2005).…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The two articles we are comparing in this discussion are the Baine and Galva articles; both of these articles show a form of support for vaccines and one shows us how much power the government has when it comes down to enforcing medically ordered rules in times of crisis. The Baine article talks more about how parents should not have the power to overrule a doctors decision that a child needs a vaccine; Galva’s article is focused on how the government reacts in times of extreme medical emergencies or global pandemics. Let’s first focus on the Baine article, he believes that parent need to listen to medical advise from doctors because of two main reasons, one they are not only looking out for the child getting the vaccine but also the health…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In times of crisis, the United States has a tendency to limit the Constitutional civil liberties granted to its citizens. This has been the practice since the foundation of the country itself, seen in times of war, famine, depression, or even in times of mass-panic. However, as time progresses, the question of whether or not the restriction of rights granted in the Bill of Rights is, in fact, justified. Alan Brinkley, in both his essay Civil Liberties in Times of Crisis and his book American History: A Survey, explores the history of the suppression of freedoms during troubling times for the country. His conclusion, that the US government goes in excess what the crisis warrants while limiting liberties, is well-supported, using evidence from the “140 years of silence”, World War I, and the Red Scare to argue his…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1984, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommended health care worker to be vaccinated against influenza. According to the ethics principles, health care works are expected to receive the influenza vaccination. This can become an ethical dilemma because it contradicts the human rights to refuse medical care. Also, religious obligation could oppose debate.…

    • 54 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the beginning of the outbreak of influenza know as “the Spanish flu,” Americans were willing to accept public health officials guidance in the early weeks of the crisis. Most looked at the public health officials as hope and a cure to the sickness. As months passed, these officials were not successful in containing the flu. Americans had grown impatient and resistant against their help toward the public.…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arguments Against Anthrax

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages

    With consideration of the First Responder Anthrax Preparedness Act in the U.S. Senate (S. 1915) following passage in the U.S. House of Representatives (H.R. 1300), as well as House consideration of the PREPARE Act (H.R. 3583), it is important to revisit the concerns of first responders as they relate to the threat of anthrax and anthrax vaccination. The health and safety of America's first responders are the reasons for consideration of these bills, which include language to provide emergency responders access to anthrax vaccine in the Strategic National Stockpile.…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Government quarantines during both the flu and the Ebola epidemic show how quareintes can be counter productive, and why politically expedient actions must not be taken if they are not rooted in logic. Furthermore, the British actions taken during the flu epidemic, as well as government negligence and racism, still affect part of Africa…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Ebola

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Ebola is a world issue at this point, as leaders of public health we have the responsibility to make an example of how to handle viral outbreaks. The current ban on visas to those who have been in west Africa is not the way to do this. While some believe that banning these people from entering Canada is the best way to protect our citizens, there are several arguments against the ban. Including that the bans gives incentive for countries to hide viral outbreaks, that this gives incentive for people to travel via les documented means in order to avoid these bans, that these people can not be tracked and helped if they are found to be infected, the several effects that disregarding the WHO, the experts leading world health, can have, and the unjustified reasons for implementation [1]. I will consider both sides.…

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The usage of quarantine increases numerous ethical worries. Countless people believe that quarantine starts an unjustified reduction of personal rights, while others see it as an essential characteristic of infectious disease control. Some ethical thoughts to consider are whether the idea of quarantine is reasonable ethically and it is effective. It is vital to make a strong difference amongst quarantine and separation (Rothstein, 2015). Quarantine is the separation of people unprotected who are not yet indicative for a period of time to regulate whether they will have symptoms. Quarantine can accomplish many goals; it ends the sequence of communication because it is less likely to infect others in social movement. Also, it permits the individuals…

    • 159 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Howard Markel’s book Quarantine he explains how there was a point in time in which immigrants coming into New York were isolated and kept in squalid conditions to help prevent the spread of cholera and typhus. This quarantine gave immigrants limited freedoms and limited rights to certain things due to their predicaments and being put in these isolated regions away from others. Also in the text, Ebola vs. Civil Liberties it states, “Having committed no crime, having done no wrong, you are sentenced to house arrest or banishment. It is unfair. It is well, well un-American. But when an epidemic threatens, we do it because we must.” This quotation deliberately explains why those who are infected during an epidemic are violated. It is a must. Though it may be morally wrong and goes against the American rights and traditions it is only done to protect the public health and the majority citizens and the continuation of the disease…

    • 1072 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethics Of Vaccinations

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The value and ethics of vaccinations is hotly debated, and many parents choose not to vaccinate their children. Older people are at greater risk of contracting diseases. There are many valid reasons to vaccinate. Vaccines aid in preventing disease, saving lives, and keeping the spread of disease at bay.…

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Historical, American’s traditions places high value on individual freedom, on personal liberty, and allowing the individual to "do his or her own thing." This perpetual culture views society as separate independent individuals who are free to pursue their own individual goals and interests without intrusion from others. In this individualistic culture it is difficult, perhaps almost impossible, to convince people that they should sacrifice some of their “individual freedom”, some of their personal goals, and some of their self-interest, for the sake of the common good, the community. This cultural traditions, seems to reinforce the individual who believes their action do not affect others, and that they should not contribute to the community's common good. This should not be the case. In public health, people are connected and what affects one affects communities. An example of how an individual can affect a community even nation(s) is Ebola. When the disease surfaced last year, it not only affected the individual, but also the community (which included family and friends) and other nations. Isolating the individuals infected served as both an individual and population good. Because of isolation, however cruel it may seem it protected high number of the…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I agree that the ethical framework of public health and medical ethics needs to be separated, it is critical to recognize specifically what public health contains. The future of public health as a philosophy does equally to assure the conditions in which individuals can be healthy (Marckmann et.al, 2015). Public health is a organized movement of development to support, protect, increase, and restore the health of people in the whole population. With many broad ideas of the field, many procedures and ideas for public health ethics have proven over the past time span.…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays