Preview

Pros And Cons Of North Carolina Primaries

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
482 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pros And Cons Of North Carolina Primaries
The type of primaries that should be operating in North Carolina is an open primary not a closed primary. The reasons North Carolina should operate on an open primary is to enable voters in both parties to vote whoever they favored the most, allowing voters to vote in opposite parties, and reduces stress when going through the voting process since most of the voter ballots will include both parties’ leaders instead having leaders assigned to the voter party. On the side note, North Carolina should not have a law that requires voter I.D. since its violating and discriminate minorities to be able to exercises their right as an American Citizens. It should be easy for American voters to go to the polls and fulfill their duty as an American.
Conducting an open primary during election seasons would benefit the voters the most since it would allow the voters to vote cross parties if they wish. For instance, take a look at this year president elections, if we go back in March when the primaries were going on here in North Carolina. You will notice that the primaries here in North Carolina were a closed primary which means the voters can only
…show more content…
Since operating an open primary would allow the voters to vote for whoever they favor the most. For example, if a republican voter does not like an of the candidates within the voter party, the voter can go vote a candidate in a different party which will cost the other candidates or party a vote. Another reason why open primaries would affect the political parties because it will “loses the ability to stand candidates who offer ideas to the public who express its distinctive values and beliefs” (White). Which it saying that having open primaries would devalue the idea of having political parties as communities of share beliefs and values. Therefore, an open primary would affect the candidates and parties the most than as a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    I feel that the electoral college system needs to be removed from our presidential elections. It causes more harm than good and, makes many voters not vote. There are pros and cons to the system but, there are too many cons for it to continue. Presidential candidates only care about big states “for the win”. Which makes voters think they're small electoral college state is worthless. So in this essay, I will convince you and, tell you the truth behind the Electoral College system.…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When citizens vote and cast their ballot for the candidate that they believe will be fit for president, they are not voting directly for their favored candidate. Instead of a direct popular election, the United States has the Electoral College, a group of elected electors who represent a certain states votes. The Electoral College was established by the constitution to protect minority interests and reduce the possibility of a regional candidate. However, some believe that the advantages of a direct popular vote election, such as its consideration of democratic values, outweigh the disadvantages. While others believe that the Electoral College has been put in place to hinder regional candidates not allow it to happen.…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “In England, at this day, if elections were open to all classes of people, the property of landed proprietors would be insecure.” James Madison expressed in Notes of the Secret Debates of the Federal Convention of 1787. He believed that if elections were available to all classes of people, it would be the downfall of business and governing. But because the government was going to be responsible and in control of the states, it is important to take everybody’s word equally as they are ones being governed.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Every four years, the Electoral College enjoys a fleeting moment of fame. But the impact of the college on presidential elections is far greater and more controversial than its brief life indicates.…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Electoral college is a process that is set up by our founding fathers in the constitution; it is a “compromise between election of the President by a vote in Congress and election of the President by a popular vote of qualified citizens” (U.S Electoral College). Electoral college is an example of indirect democracy; therefore, we do not choose our president directly. Thus, electoral college is not democratic.…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Electoral College, established by the founding fathers in the United States Constitution, is a process whereby a body of electors chosen by voters in each state cast a formal vote to elect the president and vice president. Among many other things established within the Constitution, the Electoral College requires extensive reform. The Constitution itself was merely a framework for the United States government and did not take into account the extent to which society would change between 1787 and 2015. Amidst the several problems constituted by the Electoral College, the four most threatening complications consist of the possibility for the loser of the popular vote to win the electoral vote, the inequality among the distribution of votes according to population, the exclusion of third party victors, and the consequences that arise in case of a tie.…

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Who 's voting for the president? Not you. We live in a society where your vote…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Presidency is a strong idea in America. It elects our highest executive leader, the president. A good strong, experienced president is a viable resource. Just to be clear, a president should be experienced in someway . They should first occupied a spot in government such as a governor or senator. They will have a voice and understanding in politics, know about foreign policies and politics, and they will know their way around the government. Think about, who would want a presidential candidate without any political experience or would they? As history has shown, freshness has ruled. Even today, presidential candidate Donald Trump is winning. He has no political experience, however he has considered by New York Republicans to be governor in October 2013, but he never ran. This is the most controversial question in politics, maybe. Should amateurs be allowed in the oval office?…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Instead, the system should just be modified. The whole winner-take-all system is what should be abolished in order to more accurately reflect the popular will across the nation. It should be replaced by the Congressional District Plan already put in use in Maine and Nebraska. In this new system, Electoral votes are distributed based on congressional district winners plus another two for whoever receives a majority of the state’s votes. This way, just like in Congress, the will of the people and the state are accurately represented in each…

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Growing up as kids we were taught the design of our democracy and the constitutional principles. According to the Webster Dictionary a democracy is “ government in which people choose their leaders by voting, and where they are treated equally and have equal rights.” The definition does not capture what the United States feels it's a democracy. The United States is believe in the democratic ideology is, but is best known as a representative republic. In The Columbia Encyclopedia, Sixth Edition, 2001: "Traditionally a republic is distinguished from a true democracy in that the republic operates through a representative assembly chosen by the citizenry, while in a democracy the populace participates directly in governmental affairs. In actual practice,…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the 2000 election, Al Gore and Ralph Nader split the left wing vote. (Document 5). While Nader only won 3% of the popular vote, the election was so close that 3% more of the popular vote would have put Gore in office. (Document 5). This also happened in the 1912 election, when the Republicans split the vote between the incumbent Roosevelt, and Taft, allowing Wilson to win. The voters know that this will always be the result, so they do not vote for the party that their beliefs align with the closest. Instead, they vote Republican or Democrat to actually have a chance of winning the election. Third party candidates cannot win not only because of our two-party system, but because of our winner-take-all system. If two candidates split the liberal vote, the conservative party will win all the votes in that state. If this trend continues, the conservative party will win the entire election. (Document 6). If the United States based elections on the popular vote instead of the Electoral College, then people would be more likely to vote with the party they agree with most, not the party that is more likely to win. This would make citizens actually want to vote because they have more options and they would feel like their vote actually…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Democratic Debate was really good. I honestly enjoyed watching it time just flew by. After it ended I just wanted to keep watching more. It was so refreshing hearing people talk about the real issues in this country, like the economy, healthcare, education, and corruption. Unlike the Republican Debate which mostly focused on Planned Parenthood, Donald Trump, and Iran.…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The 2016 Presidential Election is slowly approaching its end. Jokes and memes are subtly fading as November draws near and as the primaries wrap up. Seeing that they are finishing up, what are the results so far? Since the first caucus on February 1 until the last primary on June 4, votes are being sent in around the U.S. Oddly, voters aren’t voting for their favored candidates directly, but voting for the candidates’ representatives. What’s happening right now is called the primaries (and caucuses!). The purpose of primaries is to choose delegates to support a certain candidate during national conventions. Delegates basically represent a candidate’s votes at the convention. The two main types of primaries are open or closed. Open primaries…

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    That is why I agree with the Electoral College. I think it is the best and fair way to run the election. The Electoral College has performed over 50 presidential elections. I think that the Founding Fathers were trying to let everyones vote count. It contributes to the cohesiveness of the country by requiring a distribution of popular support to be elected…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The state political parties who choose electors resist change. The officials are not sure how exactly to change the system. It is easier to resist change than it is to start it. The problem with the Automatic Plan is that it is such a small fix of only one problem that it would not be worth the time for such a small change. The problem with the Proportional Plan is that it would undermine the two party system and deflate the president’s victory margin, making it hard to lead (Longley, 1972, 49-56). The Proportional Plan would make it harder to obtain the 270 votes necessary to win, which would raise chances for more elections being decided by the House of Representatives Longley, 1972, 56). The Problem with the District Plan is that it is more likely to get Electoral College deadlock, simply meaning no candidate gets the majority vote and the decision moves to the House of Representatives. The problem with the Direct Vote Plan is that it would deflate the winning margin of the president and make it harder to govern (Longley, 1972, 68). The minor parties would flourish under this system. The candidates would be forced to spend more money on their campaign because they would have to campaign nationwide rather than focusing on swing states only. All of the main alternative plans fix some of the bigger problems but bring in new problems that the old system does not have. There will…

    • 1924 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays