Preview

Pros And Cons Of Military Intervention

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1112 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pros And Cons Of Military Intervention
proclaims western beliefs and medicine superior to Liberian culture. This again feeds into the issue of lack of trust: and trust between those giving and receiving aid is a significantly large issues because it keeps the provision of aid and communication network efficient. Without trust humanitarian work cannot suffice.

Another place we can look for the negative consequences of politicizing a humanitarian issue is in the situations of non-consensual military intervention. Politicizing intervention can have significant negative consequence on the stability and security of a state. In many instances sovereign states will intervene in other sovereign states, without consent, if they believe there is a humanitarian crisis at hand. From an outside …show more content…
A modern example one can look at is the recent war in Afghanistan. The war an intervention by the US military that came along with a strong agenda to bring democracy and economic development to the middle east. Issues arose from Vast majority of the resistance in Afghanistan that was ant-western and anti-American based. Critiquing the American military approach to this one can see that intervening a sovereign nation with a military is no way to gain the trust or connection with all local actors that will enable real development and change. Instead when humanitarian work is politicized such as in this case many people will be resistant and the overall impact will be negative. Another s negative consequences of military intervention as a politicized form of humanitarianism can result from the actual deaths and damages caused when armed military are involved. A good piece of evidence to support this is an article Thomas Geist detailing Saudi Arabian And US forces air strikes over Yemen. The purpose behind the air strikes was a politically motivated action in order to “stabilize” the Middle East; A goal to promote humanitarianism by spreading political stability and then in turn promote development in Yemen. This air strike is a string of many air strikes on Yemen by Saudi Arabia that has …show more content…
It is simply human nature to act in one’s view of what’s right and what’s wrong and that posses a major problem when trying to remain neutral is significantly difficult conflicts and challenges. In many scenarios there are tough decisions to be made in regards to taking political stance or politicizing action in humanitarian conflicts. A great example to begin with is from the article by Tom Daschile discussing the current crisis in Ukraine. The piece covers that the Russian government is providing economic assistance and aid to pro-Russian separatist in Ukraine, while the Ukrainian military is outmanned and out of money. The dilemma this piece brings about is questioning whether or not the US and European Union should intervene or financially aid the Ukrainian forces. Is there a right to intervene between conflicts of state governments of two sovereign states? Will the US appear as imperialist if they intervene and support a pro-Ukrainian side for the country? The idea of going in to Ukraine to “save” the Ukrainian people from Russia posses an issue to picking sides and consent against the pro-separatist in Ukraine who want to become part of Russia. The crisis in Ukraine does not appear in the same nature as many other humanitarian crises
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    SOC 300 Week 4 Assignment 1 The Effects Of War And Peace On Foreign Aid Strayer Latest
    • 290 Words
    • 1 Page

    SOC 300 Week 4 Assignment 1 The Effects Of War And Peace On Foreign Aid Strayer Latest

    SOC 300 - Strayer. Tags: and Human Capital, Health Care, soc 300, soc 300 strayer, SOC 300 WK 4 Assignment 1 - The Effects of War and Peace on Foreign Aid, SOC 300 WK 9 Assignment 2 - Lending Institutions, soc300, Sociology of Developing Countries, strayer university.…

    • 290 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of The US Invasion
    • 151 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Pros And Cons Of The US Invasion

    While most Americans call the war the, “American-Mexican War”, the other side would call it, “The U.S. Invasion”. If it is God’s reasoning to expand the U.S. territory as far as possible, then is it also his reasoning to murder those upon their own land? It is not only unjustified to take the land from the Mexicans, however to become inhuman enough to kill those while doing so is unspeakable. There was no need for any more conflict at that time, so to start a war was not ideal for anyone. Would a war be more beneficial or cost efficient than a compromise or a buyout? The Mexicans had only simple ideas of allowing outsiders into their land to increase population. In the words of General Francisco Mejia, “The right of conquest has always been…

    • 151 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Ww2: Isolationist vs. Interventionist
    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Ww2: Isolationist vs. Interventionist

    As a citizen of the United States, I strongly believe that it is best that we should get involved in the raging war in Europe. If this action is taken, the United States won’t appeal to many European countries as useful or any help whatsoever as well as backstabbing them. If others fail, we fail because we are all dependent on each other internationally. If we choose to intervene, we will help make peace. Another result in isolating ourselves from the war is rather than going to the war, the war will come to us and we won’t be prepared for the disasters that lie ahead. The benefits will outweigh the consequences if the United States chooses wisely to intervene during this world war.…

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of War Waging In Iraq
    • 2621 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of War Waging In Iraq

    The war waging in Iraq is the biggest argument in the United States today. There are two sides to this argument, as there is any every case. Either you are a supporter of the war, or you don’t support the war. Though you can’t be in the middle because this issue is far to important no to care about. In the spring of 2003, President George Bush declared war against Saddam Hussein regime in Iraq. President Bush strongly believed that Saddam either had or was harboring weapons of mass destruction. He gave Saddam a forty-eight hour deadline to remove them. Saddam did nothing. In result, we invaded Iraq. It took only weeks for the most powerful army in the world to take over this weak country. Then the hunt for the weapons of mass destruction began. Come to find out, no weapons were found. Only a few rockets filled with nerve agents. Later on, Saddam was found hiding in a hole under a house outside a small village. Since then, the Americans have been trying to run this country. Although most of the Iraqi’s are glad we have taken out Saddam, there is a small half that is not, and has been making the rebuilding process very difficult. I am very much for the war and I hope to further solidify my…

    • 2621 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Bombing Libya
    • 976 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of Bombing Libya

    “Colonel Qaddafi is not the only, and perhaps not even the biggest, present backer of terrorism.” (Bombing Libya. The need for action). “Unless this weeks bombing causes him to stop sponsoring terrorists, the time will come when it will be right to use more force and, if necessary, to overthrow him.” (Bombing Libya.…

    • 976 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Bombing Iraq
    • 151 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Pros And Cons Of Bombing Iraq

    The Islamic State is a terrorist group that should be stopped. They have hurt and continue to hurt a lot of people, but there isn’t much that the U.S. could do that has not been done yet. In my opinion, the fastest way to end with a problem is to get rid of it completely. One way to achieve that is by using nuclear weapons. Bombing Iraq to swipe the Islamic State could be an infinitive answer, but like everything there are some pros and cons to this method. To be more exact there are more negative effects to this method. First of all, Isis is not just in one place, but it’s spread all over the region. That means the U.S. would have to use many bombs. That would be extremely expensive and ineffective. Also, we would also be killing innocent…

    • 151 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Copy Of WW2 Big Ideas And Essential Questions
    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Copy Of WW2 Big Ideas And Essential Questions

    1. War changes a society. Societies make good and bad decisions in a time of war.Political decisions have…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of The Iraq War
    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of The Iraq War

    The United States has been at war since its creation in 1776. It has battled confrontation 222 out of 239 years, just about 93% of its continuance. Notably, one of the most crucial wars is the “War on Terror”. Beginning in March of 2003, this war initially served the purpose of getting rid of the country’s leader Saddam Hussein to prevent his use of suspected stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction. While this war was strategically justified the real war between Iraq and the U.S. began long before what is officially recognized. The United States of America should not have invaded Iraq as it promoted the illegal exercise of government power and democracy, encouraged continuous genocide and violence, and empowered an extreme capitalist regime.…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of The US Invasion Of Iraq
    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of The US Invasion Of Iraq

    Our heroes are out there fighting for America. But exactly what are they fighting for, because it seems like our own government is hiding information from us. They say that it’s to protect us. Is it really? A government that we call one of our own and one that we trust has deceived us. For the families who are losing their sons, daughters, mothers, and fathers, etc.,who are in the war, are just told that they should be proud of their protector protecting the United States of America. After the soldiers die, the only remembrance of the fallen is the burial. Only families remember their deaths while the government moves on with their business and they say that they care for our people. To me the United States should have never gone to war with…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Just War Theory: The War In Iraq
    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Just War Theory: The War In Iraq

    Comparative justice. In the case of the Iraq War, the negatives far outweigh any positives. We are still trying to repair the damage, and have not only caused unnecessary civilian casualties, but have…

    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    American Intervention Research Paper
    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages

    American Intervention Research Paper

    Although there may be probable cause for intervention, we still shouldn’t interfere until explicitly asked or told to by the Security Council. As seen in previous readings, often intervention fails meet the nation building effort we put in. Therefore if we go in with the actual humanitarian reasons we claim to have, we will always succeed. However, we always have these underlying motivations and goals that we never seem to be able to reach.…

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    HS HST MWS2 S2 03 04 GA
    • 316 Words
    • 1 Page

    HS HST MWS2 S2 03 04 GA

    In my opinion the U.S getting involved with Chile was a good thing. With the help of the U.S CIA they helped the women who marched for the food shortages. The CIA also urged the Chilean military to take action. When they did on September 11, 1973 when they surrounded Allende with tanks while the Chilean air force dropped bombs on the building where Allende was at he refused to surrender and died. The United States will gain popularity from this and it will be in our history books for years to come. If the United States did not intervenient the president of Salvador would have made a communist country and would be like Cuba. If the United States had not got involved there would have been a food shortage and lots of people would have died of starvation mostly children and women. The United States helped turn a democracy into a dictatorship. But it was an anticommunist dictatorship, so for years the united states looked the other way.…

    • 316 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Internationalism In World War I
    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Internationalism In World War I

    In recent history, an international community has proved to be anything but international, nor a community. Internationalism is the prime cause of conflict, as it has caused localized issues to be expanded into worldwide wars, therefore it should only be pursued to the extent of regional communication. Key examples are both world wars, as well as current day conflicts and human rights infringements in Middle Eastern countries. World War 1 was not initially a worldwide war, but a conflict between two neighbouring countries with numerous allies. By extension, World War 2 was started due to failures of internationalism at the end of the first world war, which then resulted in one of, if not the, largest genocide in recent history. Furthermore,…

    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Vietnam War
    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Vietnam War

    One of the most critical outcomes of armed conflict is the impact on societies. Armed conflict has far-reaching effects and substantially impacts societies. Below is a list of conflicts the United States fought after 1918.…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Analysis Of Jack Snyder's One World, Rival Theories
    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Analysis Of Jack Snyder's One World, Rival Theories

    The year of 2014 has proven to be that no president gets a free pass when it comes to difficult international decisions. Over the last term and a half, the Obama administration really has been picking up the disruptions of the Middle East right where Bush left them while simultaneously being dealt with more issues of diplomacy. The occurrences involving Ukraine and Syria have, in opinion, shown the current administrations true colors. It is the prime example of the realism ideology and the contrast between “hard” and “soft” power. In both situations, Obama has shown great reluctance in putting to use the American military. Although tens of thousands Syrians have been murdered and Ukraine has been under direct attack from Russia, present administration has moved from the “hard power” that killed Osama bin Laden and essentially ended the war in Iraq to a potential isolationist. However, as some could argue, like Stephan M. Walt, “foreign policy is not philanthropy.” Unless allies have direct benefits for the United States, perhaps the nation has no business jumping to the rescue (Walt). In other words, America is once again bringing focus back to the home front and has the potential of taking a more realist approach to foreign policy than ever before. If the nation truly does not want to look out for the interest of fellow democratic states simply because it…

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More

Related Topics