Pros And Cons Of Anthropological Dualism
This paper will delve into Christians Anthropological Dualism and Materialism/Physicalism, finding the positive and negative aspects of both viewpoints. Christian Dualism is the true anthropological viewpoint available, and this paper will bring out the common pitfalls of materialism. This subject is important in today’s society because many atheists do not believe in life after death, affirming that there is nothing in the world apart from the physical body despite the abundance of evidence present. Materialism, while it does have some advantages, is clearly inferior to Dualism, specifically Christian Dualism, as the most plausible explanation for the current state of the humans. While Materialism is embraced by much of the scientific and academic community of this world, Christian Dualism is the more correct view on anthropological dualism, and if this is correct, it has life changing implications for humans living today.
Materialism by definition is the thought “brain events cause mental events and some mental events cause brain events” in a measurable and quantifiable fashion. Thomas Hobbes famously stated in his book Leviathan that “I can explain all …show more content…
While an appeal to popularity is never a strong argument in philosophy, C.S. Lewis in The Problem of Pain makes an interesting observation that is worth noting:
If the universe is so bad… how on earth did human beings ever come to attribute it to the activity of a wise and good Creator? Men are fools, perhaps, but hardly so foolish as that. The direct inference from black to white, from evil flower to virtuous root, from senseless work to a workman infinitely wise, staggers belief… The spectacle of the universe as revealed by experience can never have been the ground of religion: it must always have been something in spite of which religion, acquired from a different source, was
Materialism by definition is the thought “brain events cause mental events and some mental events cause brain events” in a measurable and quantifiable fashion. Thomas Hobbes famously stated in his book Leviathan that “I can explain all …show more content…
While an appeal to popularity is never a strong argument in philosophy, C.S. Lewis in The Problem of Pain makes an interesting observation that is worth noting:
If the universe is so bad… how on earth did human beings ever come to attribute it to the activity of a wise and good Creator? Men are fools, perhaps, but hardly so foolish as that. The direct inference from black to white, from evil flower to virtuous root, from senseless work to a workman infinitely wise, staggers belief… The spectacle of the universe as revealed by experience can never have been the ground of religion: it must always have been something in spite of which religion, acquired from a different source, was