Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Proposition 8: Banning Gay Marriage in California

Good Essays
1581 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Proposition 8: Banning Gay Marriage in California
Proposition 8:
Banning Gay Marriage in California

Gay marriage is one of the most controversial issues of our time. It’s splattered all over news shows, radio, and newspapers. Which politicians support legalizing same sex marriage? Who’s against it? Which celebrities are commenting about it this week? One of the most publicized events in the battle about same-sex marriage was Proposition 8. This was a California amendment passed November 4th of 2008, officially eliminating the right of marriage between anyone but a man and woman. Same-sex marriage was legal for 7 months in California. Even though the grandfather clause allowed the marriages issued within that time to stay valid, scores of future couples lost a rare opportunity to marry. (Ballotpedia) Proposition 8 affected the lives of gay people throughout California by depriving couples of legal rights unique to marriage, slowing gay rights progress, and setting a precedent of political inaction. Marriage is considered a celebration, a right of passage, and in most religions, a holy union. It’s the happy ending in fairy tales, the front page of gossip magazines, and the premise for many romantic comedies. The legal benefits, while less glamorous than a cinderella wedding, are an important part of marriage that are often overlooked. According to Lifetips, a gay marriage advocate site, married couples have rights like inheritance, and property rights. Property rights refer to owning houses together, and being able to pay joint mortgages. Another important right that marriage allows is-of-kin, or conservator rights. These rights allow someone to make important medical decisions if their spouse is gravely ill. (Idealaunch) Married couples are also able to gain health insurance from one person’s employer, receive social security, Medicare and obtain disability benefits from ones husband or wife. (Marriage Rights & Benefits) Arguably one of the most important marriage rights is the ability to file for adoption. A single person has the opportunity to file for adoption, but the chance of him or her getting a child is far less than someone who is married. This is especially important to same-sex couples because adoption may be critical if they wish to start a family. While some states like New Jersey and New York ban discrimination against potential adoption candidates for sexual orientation, there are states where this is not the case. Florida for example, allows homosexuals to participate in foster care, but hasn’t allowed gay adoption since the 1977 law that banned it. The federal judge in that case, James King, said “Plaintiffs have not asserted they can demonstrate that homosexual families are equivalently stable, are able to provide proper gender identification, or are no more socially stigmatizing than married heterosexual families.” (Gay Adoption) Certain adoption agencies refuse gay and lesbian singles, along with same-sex couples looking to adopt. Prop 8 supporters felt that the amendment would protect agencies like those from being persecuted for their moral beliefs. (Nancy Polikoff 89) The passing of Proposition 8 not only stripped homosexual couples crucial marriage rights, but further burdened the ability for those couples to start a family.

Before Proposition 8 was introduced, gay marriage was legal, because seven months before, Proposition 22 had been overturned. Proposition 22 was a statute enacted in 2000 where the California Family Code legally defined marriage as a union between a man and a woman. (Claire Snyder 108) However, according to sources, proponents of Prop 8 felt that Prop 22 was not strong in protecting traditional marriage between a man and a woman. Proposition 22 was a statute, subject to judicial interpretation. (About Prop 8) An amendment however, would not be open to interpretation. That fear was proved to be legitimate when in 2004 the California Supreme Court struck down Prop 22 May 15th 2008 in a 4-3 vote. (Candace McCoy 46) Within the first month of gay marriage becoming legal, marriage license applications poured in. According to Professorshouse.com, San Francisco received 4,037 applications after Proposition 22 was overturned. 18,000 marriage ceremonies took place in the seven months before November 2008, when Proposition 8 was passed. 74% of those marriages took place with couples over 35 years old. 69% had a member holding a college degree and most were older and more educated than traditional straight newlyweds. (Statistics) Celebrities like Steven Spielberg, Brad Pitt, Ellen DeGeneres, Molly Ringwald, and P!nk openly supported equal rights for all couples. (California Proposition 8) A new era of tolerance was emerging. All that changed with the Prop 8 amendment in. Actor Colin Firth said “When Proposition 8 passed, I thought, ‘If that can happen now, if something so retrograde can occur in 2008,

maybe we haven’t made much progress at all. To me it was this triumphant day-when America made a very progressive change-and it had this bitter twist. I’m playing a man who is gay and being denied basic human rights in 1962, when a law is being passed to deny the same rights today’”. (Idealaunch) Firth’s feelings were echoed by many throughout the nation. California had been an example of how modernizing old views could be successful. This example, as it turned out, was never fully realized. Kate Kendell, the executive director of the National Center for Lesbian Rights said of why marriage meant so much “It is more than symbolism to say that an entire category or recognition is off limits to one class of people, and the category that is off limits is the one that is most culturally desirable”. Along with being a blow to civil rights movements, Prop 8 was also the invitation proponents of traditional marriage needed again to come forward. Throughout the campaign for Prop 8, different viewpoints on why gay marriage should be banned began to appear. Robb and Robin Wirthlin are a Massachusetts couple who supported the amendment for their children. They were shocked when their 3rd grade son came home from his public school to tell his parents he read “The Prince and the Prince”. A book about gay marriage. “3rd grade is way too young to teach students about homosexuality...or to teach that gay marriage is equal to traditional marriage” Robb said in an interview with a reporter for the Yes on 8 website. (ProtectMarriage) The assumptions that legalizing same-sex marriage would destroy traditional family values was a particularly potent statement for some homosexuals, especially to those who

were parents. Approximately 1/3 of lesbian couples have children, 1/5 of gay couples have children and from the 2000 US census, there are 6-10 million kids with homosexual parents. (Idealaunch) Even with these numbers of gay and lesbian families, Proposition 8 instilled a sense of moral isolation between heterosexual and homosexual parents and families. Sheila Kuehl was the first legislator in California to be openly lesbian. She said “Gay and lesbian people fall in love. We settle down. We commit our lives to one another. We raise our children. We protect them. We try to be good citizens.” (Micheal Mello 214) On November 4th 2008 same-sex marriage was banned in California. Though there has been subsequent political action elsewhere in states like Iowa and Vermont, there has been a significant stall of momentum in California. The current governor, Arnold Schwarzenegger, just recently reaffirmed his opposition to same-sex marriage, saying “I will uphold the decision of the California Supreme Court.” (Marriage Rights) There have also been three lawsuits since Proposition 8 passed. They all sought the invalidation of the amendment, siting that the revocation of the right to marriage was unconstitutional. On November 18th of 2008 the California Supreme Court made a statement saying that they would look into the lawsuits. By May 26th of 2009 the California Supreme Court spoke again, this time to announce that it would uphold Proposition 8. It had been upheld by a 6-1 vote. (Ballotpedia) Upholding the amendment has led to a stagnant political climate surrounding the gay marriage in California. Though

there is another appeal against the Proposition set for 2010, the movement has yet to pick up any true publicity and momentum. Not only is the state government content to stay inactive, but so are citizens. As of 2009, approximately 54% of the citizens oppose gay marriage, while only 33% support it. (Claire Snyder 15) These components all add up to an unsettling complacency with inadequate equal marriage rights in California. 70% of California’s residents showed up on November 4th of 2008 to cast their vote on an issue that would affected many aspects of the lives of gay citizens. (Statistics) Proposition 8 was one of the most powerful legal documents of 2008. The passing of the amendment added fuel to an already fiery debate over gay marriage, and put California into the line of fire. While it was controversial politically, it did more than change the political landscape of California. Prop 8 changed the lives of every gay citizen in California, and indirectly, around the nation. Equal marriage rights are at much greater risk for same-sex couples, and it has slowed the gay civil rights movement in the United States of America. Proposition 8 had many negative effects, but gay activists like popular talk show host Ellen DeGeneres have hope that someday Proposition 8 will be a mistake far in the countries past. “I believe one day a ‘ban on gay marriage’ will sound totally ridiculous. In the meantime, I will continue to speak out for equality for all of us”.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Same sex marriage legalization has been a continue argument for years. It was admitted as legal by California government in June 2008, but it was halted due to the passage of Proposition 8. There is no wonder why people take Proposition 8 as hate towards LGBTI community. Thus, Morse wrote a article in National Review Online to appeal more supporter, and to argue there is no hate toward LGBTI community from Proposition 8. Her rhetorical choices help to increase the probability that there are more readers will support her argument.…

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Prop 8

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages

    California voters voted in Proposition 8, on the November 4, 2008, statewide election. Proposition 8 added a new section to the state Constitution which provides that "Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California." The day after the election, three lawsuits challenging Prop. 8 were filed directly in the California Supreme Court. Proposistion 8 states that marriage the same sex is illegal.…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yes on Prop 8

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Proposition 8 was a huge political issue for voters in California. I voted yes like 52% of California residents to preserve marriage between a woman and a man, and limit marriage to heterosexual couples (Farrell , 2010). Proposition 8 campaign raised over 40 million to ensure Californians voted Yes on Proposition 8 (Khan, 2009). All citizens in California should vote Yes on Proposition 8 so that marriage remains between a woman and a man. Voters opposing this view often describe this issue as civil rights issue and compare it to racism. Voters that oppose Proposition 8 suggest that inequality and discrimination are being condoned by the state of California. There must be boundaries and laws when it comes to marriage. The decision for my choice to vote Yes on Proposition 8 has caused tension and division within my entire family. Voting Yes on Proposition 8 not only preserves marriage between women and men but also sets a limitation on voters and citizens making their own rules about which a person can marry.…

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bcom 275 Article Rebuttal

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages

    According to Laura Brill, the author of the article – It’s time for Prop. 8 opponents to re-engage” (Brill, May 26 2011, Pg 1) published in the OC Register, the majority of the population supports equal marriage rights. “Now, two years later, though a federal court has declared Proposition 8 invalid under the U.S. Constitution, it nonetheless remains in effect. This state of affairs persists even though most people now support equal marriage rights….”…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Prop 8

    • 960 Words
    • 3 Pages

    During the high awareness of proposition 8 SignOnSanDiego.com published two opposing articles regarding the proposition. The first article was titled “Consequences of gay marriage already here” by Charles LiMandri. In this Article LiMandri says “Yes on 8,” he believes in the negative effects of passing the proposition and ultimately disagrees with gay marriage. The second article, “It’s about treating every couple the same” author Harry Mathis feels quit the opposite. Mathis says yes “No on 8,” and speaks to the reader on a very personal level.…

    • 960 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Article Rebuttal Bcom

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “The initiative proponents, however, have appealed. Now the California Supreme Court must decide whether unelected and unaccountable initiative proponents have the power to trump the judgment of the democratically elected attorney general” (Baume, 2011). This statement by the author is a way of classifying or assuming that all the people that supported Proposition 8 are rebels and do not like to adhere to the law. What Baume does not tell you is that 52% of the California voters voted in favor of the clause “Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California” and that portion is now in the state constitution (Pew Research Center, 2011). A federal judge later ruled that the amendment to the state’s constitution was unconstitutional, then that decision was appealed (Yoshino, 2009). This…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hollingsworth V. Perry

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Marissa Bair Mr. Turcotte AP US History 6 December 2012 Hollingsworth v. Perry 1. In February of 2004 the mayor of San Francisco, Gavin Newsom and other city officials began distributing marriage licenses to gay and lesbian couples in the city of San Francisco, California. In March of the same year, the County of San Francisco ordered the halt of marriages, pending court review. On March 29th, the San Francisco Superior Court declared San Francisco’s issuing of same-sex marriage licenses illegal. Multiple state Supreme Court hearings were held on the legality of the same-sex marriages in the spring of 2004. San Francisco filed its own lawsuit against the state of California in order to have its case heard. In August, the state Supreme Court ruled the same-sex marriages performed in San Francisco violated authority and state law. The court deemed all same-sex marriages performed to be null. The next year, in March of 2005, Richard Kramer, the trial judge of In re Marriage Cases (2008) reported that California’s ban on same-sex marriage was unconstitutional. They said marriage was a fundamental right that cannot be discriminated against based on sexual orientation. The next month, California legalized same-sex marriage on June 16th, 2008. Less than five months later, the marriages were stopped by the passing of Proposition 8, which provided that “only marriage between a man and a woman is valid in recognized in California.” This overturned the California Supreme Court’s ruling of In re Marriage Case that same-sex couples have the constitutional right to marry. Same-sex marriages in California…

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    California Proposition 8 (California Marriage Protection Act) was a state-wide ballot proposition passed in the November 4, 2008 state election that made same sex marriage illegal in California. The vote which won by 52% adds exactly 14 words to the California State Constitution, "Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California." To qualify for the ballot, Proposition 8 needed 694,354 valid petition signatures, equal to 8% of the total votes cast for governor in the November 2006 General Election. The initiative proponents submitted 1,120,801 signatures, and on June 2, 2008, the initiative qualified for the November 4, 2008 election ballot through the random sample signature check. The passage of Prop 8 was a major victory for religious conservatives seeking to ban gay marriage in other states, and a crippling setback for the gay rights movement nationwide.…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When it comes to Proposition 8 I would have voted against it all the way. I have often thought what gives anyone the right to take away civil rights from anyone gay or straight. I personally have struggled with this debate on so many different levels it still unbelievable to me that in court in the world would deny civil rights down to such a basic level. The fourteenth Amendment clearly has a double standard attached to it when it comes to Proposition 8. Basically saying that we can’t deny gays and lesbian civil rights within the state, but we can tell you it’s not legal to marry the person you love and are committed to because it’s not the norm of traditional marriage.…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Should sexual preference determine marriages? This is the ongoing debate our generation will have to address. California has been in the epicenters of this debate; as we witnessed voters oppose gay marriage in the elections of 2008. The success of Proposition 8 discriminated against those of homosexual orientation. Proposition 8 adjusted California’s marriage laws to prevent a change in language, favoring the majority of heterosexual America. As California’s constitution in article 1, section 7.5 reads, "Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California" (California Marriage Protection Act). This perception of marriage adopted to be law is built upon gender identity ideals that men and women have to fulfill. Women are to marry that of the opposite gender and sex. Accordingly, the language used to describe marriage was contorted by gender ideals in the fight for Proposition 8. Those for Proposition 8 argued it would restore the definition of marriage. From this perspective, marriage is seen as a tradition that is natural and immutable. To the contrary, the argument against Proposition 8 states, “OUR CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION—the law of our land—SHOULD GUARANTEE THE SAME FREEDOMS AND RIGHTS TO EVERYONE—NO ONE group SHOULD be singled out to BE TREATED DIFFERENTLY” (Official California Legislative Information). Marriage is a right that cannot be exercised by all due to sexual preference. Gay and lesbians are discriminated based on societies resistance to amend the definition of marriage past sexual preference. Additionally, the language used to describe marriage and the roles of individuals, is a major outlining factor behind the issue itself. Analyzing the language used in both arguments allows us to delve further into this question and expose why Proposition 8 should have been abolished. Proposition 8 is simply a resistance to change in language in how we come to define marriage. “Typically, language changes as a result of social political…

    • 1631 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Media Bias

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Same-sex marriage has been an on-going battle for many years. California’s opposition to same-sex marriage, Proposition 8, barely passed in the 2008 election. Same-sex marriage has been a news-worthy topic since 1997 when Hawaii passed a Domestic Partnership policy which triggered other states to change policies as well. This issue started a state-to-state debate of whether same-sex couples should have the same rights that heterosexual, married couples have. This debate between states has reached a Congressional level. The Supreme Court has agreed to hear two cases surrounding this on-going debate. The cases the Court will hear are related to allowable benefits for same-sex partners, and California’s ban on gay marriage.…

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gay marriages have been one of the hottest and controversial topics in our society. There are still problems concerning this issue of homosexuality and gay marriages. Same sex marriages are legal in Hawaii, but in all other states couples must be of the opposite sex to form a marriage. Hawaii’s decision to legalize same sex marriages is considered a milestone victory for gays and may cause a ripple affect for similar action in other states. Those who support gay marriages justify their position by the concept of love. These supporters of gay marriages feel as though gay people are being deprived of their right to love. Many people believe that gay people deserve the right to love and to take that love and form a marriage. These people believe that gays want to feel justified, meaning that as a couple they should be able to define their own marriage for themselves and make their own set of rules. Supports of same-sex marriages feel as though homosexuals are being deprived of their God given right to get married. They believe that arguments against same sex marriages are unconstitutional, and they simply do not justify a ban on same sex marriages. It is not the idea of two people of the same sex getting married that frightens people so much, but it is the thought of change and the fact that the federal government will redefine marriage to allow same sex unions. When people picture the results of same sex marriages, they see images of unstable homes. Everyone would probably agree that homosexuality has changed our society, and legalizing same sex marriages is not likely to be an exception. It would be an injustice to discriminate against a person if he or she were…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gay marriage has been the cause of intense debate in the United States for years. Sexual activity within the same gender was something that was considered normal in Greek and Roman times but in today’s society, there is a great amount of controversy concerning sexual activity between homosexuals and same-sex marriage. A couple of reasons why gay marriage has become so controversial is because of religion, the issue of procreation, and the concern for children who are raised in same sex house-holds. Although there are a great deal of people who find gay marriage to be considered a negative idea, there is also a significant amount of people who are for gay marriage and would like gay marriage to be legal in the United States. According to The Associated Press 3/27/13, a “Pew Research Center poll” that took place in March shows that the number of people in America who approve gay marriage are up to forty-nine percent and there is forty-four percent of people who do not approve (par.6). These percentages show that both sides of opinion come close in number and when there is a great amount of differences in opinion on one given subject, conflict will certainly arise.…

    • 1599 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A proposal for preventing gay marriage rights from being a large topic of debate in the United States.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gay Marriage Rights

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The definition of gay marriage or same sex marriage is when two people of the same gender want to spend the rest of their lives together and want to make it official by getting married.…

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics