Preview

Proportionality In Fog Of War

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
552 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Proportionality In Fog Of War
In the film “Fog of War”, one of Robert S. McNamara’s lessons of war was “Proportionality should be a guideline of war.” This means that the ends do not always justify the means; the means used to achieve the end should be reasonable. However, even in the movie, this is not the case. Unlike the other lessons, lesson # 4 has the word “should” in it, meaning that McNamara has not seen this lesson used yet. Proportionality is still not seen in the world today. It was also not used in the past, such as in the 1964 movie Dr. Strangelove. Thus, this lesson has rarely been applied to movies or real life.

In the segment of the movie documenting this lesson, Mr. McNamara talks about how it was not used in the bombings of Japan during the Second World War. In order to cripple Japan in terms of morale and military, the US instituted a vigorous, fierce bombing campaign. US planes would bomb Japan day and night, killing millions of civilians in the process. All of this was done in order to win a war. I believe that this is not proportional. As McNamara questions: should you kill a hundred thousand civilians a night to win a war?
…show more content…
Strangelove, it is clear that neither the Americans nor the Soviets have any regard for proportionality to win a war. The Soviets created a doomsday machine that would wipe out all life from the earth if the Americans were to start a nuclear war. They have taken severe measures to ensure that if they are attacked, they will at least tie—by wiping out the Americans as well as all life on

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    After the end of the Second World War, the world was left with two superpowers with competing ideologies: The United States of America and the Soviet Union. The Americans had come out of the war with a surging economy and served as the flagship for the capitalist nations of the West. The Soviets on the other hand practiced Communism, an ideology that was seen as a great threat to the Western way of life. 1 Though they had been allied at the end of the war, both nations quickly moved to bolster their military and economic infrastructure to prepare for the era of pseudo-colonialism and competition between the two powers they both knew would follow. By 1949, the Soviets would become the world’s second nuclear power, launching most of the world into a full out cold war between the communist East and the capitalist West. Competition between these ideologies meant that each side would fight to protect their influence in foreign nations, to spread their ideologies to new nations, and to protect against the spread of their enemy’s ideology to new nations; a policy the West…

    • 2308 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nike System Effectiveness

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A development that could have been preventable through possible disarmament negotiations after the war, had the US not underestimated the USSR. Considering the aftermath of World War II, the USSR had lost an estimate of 22 million lives and had large decimated areas of land. The US couldn’t possibly see the USSR as a military threat due to the heavy casualties the nation had sustained. In all likeliness, the US may have thought that “nuclear diplomacy” would be enough to quell the USSR if the need arose. A decade later the USSR had displayed its very own jet-bomber called the Mya-4 “Bison”. In 1955, an American air force attache, had observed twice the number of Bisons that were estimated to have been made. This jet-bomber was far more capable of inflicting injury upon the US than the Tu-4, and to further the anxiety of the US, the USSR had detonated its first thermonuclear weapon in…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rob Mcnamara Fog of War

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “Belief and seeing are both often wrong,” this is Robert McNamara’s seventh point from the film. At this point much of the context he is referring to goes back to Vietnam and all the lies and deception surrounding that war. Were we or were we not attacked on August fourth? At the time the American people were told we were indeed attacked by North Vietnam. This makes sense because that is what led us to bomb the hell out the country and get this war started. Later it is confirmed that there was no attack on that day. After the bombing finished and it is now the “fourth quarter and were losing 70-0” according to President Johnson, it was time to send in the Marines for ground war. As President of our country Johnson knew the deceptive effect this would have on the people. He knew American society would be thinking how hard this would hit the Vietnamese, but he also knew in his head the truth of the situation. He knew we didn’t stand a chance over there. He says himself that the people are going to think the bombings were Sunday school stuff compared to what the Marines will do and he replies to that “my answer is yes, but my judgment is no.” This is a prime example of pure deception of society, not to mention the fact that the numbers coming back from the war were all mostly false to our advantage. The people were being lied to by the leaders of their country.…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the Second World War, the United States and the Soviet Union emerged as superpowers and subsequently a period of tension and hostility arose, known as the Cold War. During this time, a new possibility of complete nuclear destruction that would claim the lives of many emerged, therefore “the easing or relaxing of tensions” on both sides was needed, this period would be known as detente. Both countries had been guaranteed mutually assured destruction as they had both managed to stay ahead in the development of nuclear arsenals. By the late 1960s the Soviets had surpassed the United States in intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBM) by 1,300 to 1,054. Although the U.S was still ahead in various categories, it no longer enjoyed the immense nuclear advantage as before. However, neither side was prepared for the risk of a full scale war. Apart from the possibility of a disastrous nuclear war, factors in both the U.S and the Soviet Union also motivated the need for a relaxation of tensions.Both countries were in severe economic crisis due to the arms race and needed to diverge the funds to rebuild the economy. In the United States public opinion in America indicated that the Cold War was 'unjustifiable both economically and morally' due to the ongoing war in Vietnam. All these factors would eventually lead to the establishment of detente.…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Atomic Bomb DBQ

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages

    With the end of World War 2 came the Cold war with many controversies even between former allies. Communist Russia forced control over their section that was gained in the Potsdam conference. They set up many barriers around their portion of East Berlin and eventually around East Germany. America had dropped the Atomic Bomb on Hiroshima and a new technology been revealed as a massive, deadly weapon that could wipe out thousands instantly, it was now an arms race. “Push of a button in Russia, and 35 minutes later much of U.S. could be laid to waste—with power to retaliate limited.” (Document E)…

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Union. All they could muster were relatively hollow threats on an ad hoc basis. It was an approach US Secretary of Defense James Forrestal complained was ‘a patchwork job’. Having formally adopted the concept of the ‘containment’ of Soviet Communism in late November 1948, most policymakers within the Truman administration simply assumed, or perhaps hoped is a better word, that the American atomic monopoly would somehow intimidate the Soviets from breaches of the peace for fear of precipitating an all-out war.…

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    References: Barnes, C. M., & Doty, J. (2010).What does contemporary science say about ethical leadership? Military Review, 90-93.…

    • 3042 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Midway through the 20th century, towards the end of World War II, one of the most feared and important weapons was fabricated. The nuclear bomb, also known as the atomic bomb, was first constructed by the United States, with the initial project starting in August of 1942 (“Nuclear Weapons”). The first atomic bomb was dropped on the Japanese city of Hiroshima by the United States on August 6th, 1945, and on August 9th 1945 a second bomb was dropped on Nagasaki (“Science behind”). By dropping two nuclear bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the United States forced Japan to unconditionally surrender, which ended World War II. After the world saw the power of nuclear weapons, there has been a scramble for countries to obtain…

    • 1681 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    “We have used it against those who attacked us without warning...against those who have starved, and beaten and executed American prisoners…” A good point, made by Truman, in stating that, Japan performed a surprise attack on the US. That tactic killed many innocent soldiers and even some civilians; therefore, we retaliated with a way to shorten this tragedy.…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scare

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The governments of the United States and the Soviet Union have been both wise and spectacularly lucky. No one doubts that the world is safer today because the danger of global thermonuclear war has been greatly diminished. The American and Soviet leaders gradually developed command and control systems that were successful in preventing accidents, unauthorized attacks and other immediate causes of war.…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Jus In Bello Analysis

    • 2273 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Gross ties proportionality to necessity, reasoning that what it is necessary to do can influence what it is proportionate to do. He suggests that proportionality is to be considered by looking at what has historically been necessary to win wars and that this then must be adjusted to asymmetric warfare. Gross argues that “when the weaker side of a conflict has comparatively crude weaponry, it may justifiably claim that this must broaden the scope of proportionality and allow it more collateral harm than the principle traditionally permits.” (Gross 169). This seems to me an incredible take on proportionality, which should be considered differently and apart from the principle of necessity. He is permitting to disregard a crucial principle in conducting a just war because another crucial principle may be satisfied. These two principles are independent of one another and should not be compared to allow or justify one or the other. Gross’s point of allowing non-lethal weapons and thus a broader scope of people being targeted in asymmetric warfare is constantly being stated. His main defense for this argument is that, “the use of non-lethal weapons against civilians reduce harm to civilians: Civilians suffer incapacitating harm to save them from lethal harm” (Gross 150). While this could be true, non-lethal weapons could now allow for proportionate attacks that would have been disproportionate with lethal weapons. By following Gross’s guidelines, we would be creating more war, more suffering, and more harm, to a broader scope of people. It is unnecessary, disproportional, and almost ignoring completing the principle of discrimination. These three humanitarian principles are crucial in conducting a war where the nation leading the counterinsurgency campaign wants it to follow jus in bello principles and international humanitarian laws. Gross not only describes a type of warfare that defies the…

    • 2273 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    During this speech at the United Nations, the U.S. insisted that they will protect its allies by responding to military provocation “at places and with means of our own choosing” (Dulles, 1954). This was a military doctrine and a nuclear strategy in which a state commits itself to retaliate in much greater force in the event of an attack. The policy announcement was further evidence of Eisenhower’s decision to rely heavily on the nation’s nuclear arsenal as the primary means of defense against communist aggression. Even though Eisenhower didn’t personally give the speech, he agreed 100%. This was another proof that Eisenhower’s all-or-nothing strategy threatened to turn the Soviet Union into a smoking, radiating ruin within 2 hours.…

    • 892 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Space Race Research Paper

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages

    you had, the more powerful you were. It was also to see which country was more…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Cold War, which took place from 1949 to 1991 was a very tense time between Soviet Russia and the United States of America (Trueman, What was the Cold War). Both countries were constantly at odds and willing to attack each other with nuclear weapons due to their differences in political, economic and social beliefs.While Soviet Russia believed that communism was the best social, political and economic ideology for the world to follow the United States believed capitalism was the best ideology and that communism was the enemy to democracy. Although the Cold War was a proxy war the differences between Soviet Russia and the United States caused the countries to begin battling for world domination. At this time, the United States considered…

    • 1547 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Soviet Union was very powerful and was a big challenge to America during the Cold War. However, they weren't as powerful as America is today because if they was they would still be around today. Their large military had a lot to do with their downfall this was because they did not have enough weapons or enough technology to support all of their soldiers. So which is why they were not able to defeat America because their technology was not as advanced as America’s was at the time. Even though the Soviet Union had the bigger army it was not enough for them to win the war.This strive for technology was a huge contributor to their collapse. The Soviet Union was constantly trying to keep up with the US technology, and so was spending outrageous amounts of money they didn't have. This led to massive food shortages, and public disdain for the government.…

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics