Cited: "Doubt." Law & Order: SVU. WNBC-TV, 2006. Television.
Cited: "Doubt." Law & Order: SVU. WNBC-TV, 2006. Television.
It isn’t arduous to see why some may question the efficiency of trial by jury and whether it should, and is able to, continue to discover innocence or guilt. Regarding the trial of Vicky Pryce, the failure of the jury within the hearing conjured ridicule and disdain from the judge and the media. The case deeply unsettled the trust of many in the system. The eight women and four men were dismissed after illustrating “fundamental deficits of understanding” (Jacobson, Hunter & Kirby, 2015, p. 55). Their profuse questions for the judge were deemed as unintelligent and unnecessary and so a costly re-trial was required. Consequently, this ordeal provoked a stronger desire for the abolition of trial by jury, to be replaced by a single judge as a more…
Jennifer Thomas, a 22-year old college student from Burlington, North Carolina, was raped in her off-campus apartment on July 28, 1984. During the assault, Jennifer studied her rapist’s face and other characteristics in the case that she made it out alive. Thomas was able to escape and ran to a police station and with the help of a detective, she was able to make a composite sketch of the perpetrator. The rapist also managed to rape another woman a few blocks down from Thomas’s apartment. Once the sketch was release to the public, tips came in about a man named Ronald Cotton. Cotton had a record of sexual assault and breaking and entering. A photo spread was done and Jennifer Thomas identified Ronald Cotton…
Wilson, D., & Glater, J. (2006). Files from Duke rape case give details but no answers. Retrieved from http://today.duke.edu/showcase/mmedia/pdf/nytimes825.pdf…
Despite questions to the legitimacy of Sulkowicz’s alleged rape, her thesis project performs its intended purpose of showing exhibiting the need for improved rules and regulations for rapists and the need for more punishment against sexual assault…
On April 3, Victoria Price was called to the stand to testify. She recounted her job-hunting trip to Chattanooga, the fight on the train between the white and the colored, and the rape in which Haywood Patterson was one of her attackers. She claimed that six raped her, and three raped Ruby Bates. Prosecutor Knight’s strategy was mainly to make sure his questions would keep to Victoria’s story, and so it did not change from her first story of the incident. When Samuel S. Leibowitz questioned her, however, it was merciless. His questions suggested his answers. Victoria had claimed that she stayed at Callie Brochie’s boardinghouse in Chattanooga the night before, but that was proved false. There wasn’t such a place. Leibowitz proved that she was an adulterer who had consorted with Jack Tiller, a married man, in the Huntsville freight yards two days before the alleged…
Wrightsman, L. E., Kassin, S.M, Willis, C.E (Ed.). (1987). In the jury box: Controversies in…
As we walked into the jury room, after hearing the case of Commonwealth v. Miller, I had already decided how I would vote and, honestly, I determined I was not going to be swayed. We swiftly chose a foreman by appointing the one, who had been given the jury instructions, to that position. Next, we read the jury instructions out loud, in order to remember and understand the definition of each charge. Debate over the meaning of the instructions ensued for a short amount of time before we dove into determining guilt or innocence. Everyone was given a chance to discuss the case and, personally, I felt comfortable entering the discussion and debating the case. After discussion, we voted and were evenly split among guilty or not guilty. Next, we…
Juror #3 came into this trial with a moral dilemma long before hearing the facts of the case. Given his past experiences, he would feel more inclined to vote guilty as to punish and make an example of this boy so that other kids would think twice. In this case if the jury decided on a guilty verdict, the defendant would be put to death. People might make rash decisions based…
The non-fiction book The Innocent Man by John Grisham is about Ron Williamson and Dennis Fritz who were wrongly conivcted for the murder of Debbie Carter in Ada, Oklahoma in 1986. Grisham argues that Bill Peterson, the prosecuting attorney and his team, did a bad job. Peterson created a website to respond to Grisham’s book defending his position about the event. Most of Peterson’s writings are an attempt to convince us that he had made no mistake on the case. Although Grishm’s point of view is convincing and innocents were harmed, justice was done by getting the right man in the end.…
Teresita went to a fraternity party because she'd heard that this fraternity "really knew how to have fun" and she really needed fun after a disastrous academic week. She knew that some women had been taken advantage of at previous parties, but she put that out of her mind, as she downed one drink after another. Just when things were getting dull, the coolest guy on campus took her by the hand, led her upstairs and talked her into having sex. The next day, Teresita noticed that her vagina was bruised and bleeding. She barely recalled having sex, but knew who was responsible for her condition, and filed rape charges against him with the campus administrator.…
The court said that it the defendant’s overt acts were sufficient to support the inference that he intended to rape the victim:…
Erdely, R.S. (2008). The date-rape ‘doctor’ they could not convict: 10 women charged him with…
Throughout this paper, I will discuss the concept of the ideal rape victim and discuss both sides of this debate, whether it is true or untrue. I will discuss examples as to why it is true that the ideal rape victim works today, beginning from the concept of rape in the 1800 's to discussing myths and stereotypes around rape. The creation of the Rape Shield Laws, and how it played a significant role in the judicial system regarding consent and credibility. As well as draw from examples from Crenshaw regarding intersectionality, to how race plays a factor in rape to Larcombe 's argument about the definition of the ideal…
The story begins with a fifty-two-year-old professor David Lurie claiming that his mind has solved the problem of sexual desire. He describes this to be accomplished through weekly sexual relations with a “honey-brown” prostitute. When his first solution fails, he begins an “affair” with a student thirty years his junior. Throughout the narration of this “affair” it is heavily implied that the woman was at one point raped by her professor. After a complaint was…
What makes these findings most troubling, according to Kassin and Gudjonsson, is the strong correlation between false confession and wrongful conviction. Trial jurors, we are told, are inclined to give disproportionate weight to a confessions, even taking it to outweigh so-called “hard evidence.” As a characteristic example, Kassin and Gudjonsson cite the case of Bruce Godschalk. Even when DNA evidence proved Godschalk could not have been the rapist, the District Attorney of the case refused to release him from prison, stating that “…I trust my detective and his tape-recorded evidence” (Kassin and Gudjonsson, 2005, p. 28). Because of this tendency on the part of jurors and prosecutors, together with the facts listed above…