Preview

Problem of Evil- Notes

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1650 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Problem of Evil- Notes
John Hick defined evil as “physical pain, mental suffering and moral wickedness” For Hick, the consequence of evil is suffering
NATURAL EVIL
The apparent malfunctioning of the natural world e.g. diseases and natural disasters
MORAL EVIL
The result of human immorality e.g. genocide
THE PROBLEM OF EVIL
The monotheistic God of Christianity, Judaism and Islam assumes the divine qualities of omnipotence, omniscience and omni benevolence. However, the existence of evil and suffering in the world provides a challenge to the loving God of classical theism.
AUGUSTINE
Augustine, in his book ‘Confessions,’ recognised this problem:
“Either God is not able to abolish evil or not willing; if he is not able then he is not all-powerful, if he is not willing then he is not all-good.”
INCONSISTENT TRIAD
The problem of evil can be viewed as an inconsistent triad:
[insert pic]
The three are logically inconsistent. If God is omnipotent, he is aware of the existing evil and suffering and knows how to put a stop to it. If God is omni benevolent he will want to put a stop to it. Yet evil and suffering does exist.
DAVID HUME
The atheist David Hume argued that only three possibilities exist:
I. God is not omnipotent
II. God is not omni benevolent
III. Evil does not exist
Since we have sufficient direct experience to support the existence of evil, if God exists he is either an impotent God or a malicious God; not the God of classical theism. Hume concluded that God therefore does not exist.
ANTONY FLEW
Antony Flew wrote that the biggest challenge to the believer is accepting that the existence of evil and suffering is a major problem that demands an adequate response. The problem faced by monotheists demands a solution, not of qualification; in which the nature of God is arbitrarily changed to suit different circumstances – this concept of God ‘dies the death of a thousand qualifications,’ but by the rational justification of God’s right to allow evil and suffering to
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    John Hick and the Problem of Evil
    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages

    John Hick and the Problem of Evil

    I am writing on John Hick’s piece entitled There Is a Reason Why God Allows Evil. In the selection Hick explains a theodicy, a justification of God’s goodness because of evil, the soul-making view of life in this defense of God’s way in the face of evil. The dilemma of the problem of evil is, if God is perfectly loving he must wish to abolish evil. If evil exists then God cannot be all perfectly loving. Hick’s theodicy, the soul-making view, states that God intentionally placed this evils on earth so that we can over come temptations. God wants humans to go through these test of our convictions so that they can choose good, and they can ultimately undergo spiritual growth. Hick believes that this is not evil but good, and most cannot see though the belief that the world is supposed to be a paradise.…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Summary Of Evil And Omnipotence By J. L. Mackie
    • 172 Words
    • 1 Page

    Summary Of Evil And Omnipotence By J. L. Mackie

    J.L. Mackie’s, “Evil and Omnipotence,” criticizes the debate for the existence of God by arguing that the fundamentals of what a “perfect God” is are inconsistent with one another. The main theological doctrines of what a “perfect God” entails are as followed: God is omnipotent, omnibenevolent, and omniscient. J.L. Mackie rejects this by stating God cannot be omnipotent and omnibenevolent if evil exists. He asserts that the problem of evil proves that either no god exists. Mackie soon reaches the debate question of, “Can a perfect God exist when suffering exists?”…

    • 172 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Freedo Paradox Of Omniquate Analysis
    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Freedo Paradox Of Omniquate Analysis

    The proposed solution to be discussed and Mackie’s response to it is the claim that ‘evil is due to human free will’ and as such it cannot be attributed to God. Evil should instead be attributed to the free actions of individuals, the power of which has been endowed upon them by God. While it is acknowledged that there exists evil in the world, as a result of some human free will, it is claimed that freedom of will is a more valuable good than any resultant evil. Through God allowing such freedom, He has satisfied His ‘wholly good’ requirement.…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    William Rowe Good Vs Evil Summary
    • 1596 Words
    • 7 Pages

    William Rowe Good Vs Evil Summary

    Pramiti Sankar PHIL 100 AD0 3 March 2024 Section 1: Introduction In this paper, I will critique William L. Rowe's argument from the problem of evil against the existence of an omnipotent, omniscient, and wholly good God. Rowe constructs a deductively valid argument that aims to show that the existence of intense suffering in the world provides rational grounds for atheism - the belief that such a theistic God does not exist. While his argument is logically valid, there are ultimately not sufficient grounds to confidently affirm the truth of the first premise because of our inherent human limitations in knowledge, potential ignorance of goods beyond our comprehension, fallibility in evaluating goods versus evils, and the importance of preserving…

    • 1596 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Jenny Wiggins's Essay 'My Proof Of Theism'
    • 1767 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Jenny Wiggins's Essay 'My Proof Of Theism'

    P4: Evil is not due to God but to man’s misuse of the free will that God gave him (McCloskey & Hick, 332 &347).…

    • 1767 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Mccloskey Argumentative Analysis
    • 1881 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Mccloskey Argumentative Analysis

    It goes without question, that human beings will always question the existence of “God”. Whether these questions are formed in support or denial of an omnipresent creator they are important in helping shape our morality. H J McCloskey and his article “On Being and Atheist” is very critical of theists. It thus presents several arguments on how believers are incorrect in their belief in “God”, cosmological and teleological. McCloskey also focus’s on the existence of evil and how one can find comfort in atheism when facing evil.…

    • 1881 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Problem Of Evil Rhetorical Analysis
    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Problem Of Evil Rhetorical Analysis

    Thesis: The conflict behind the idea of evil is why a perfect God would allow evil to exist on earth.…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Problem of EvilSaint Leo University
    • 690 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Problem of EvilSaint Leo University

    The argument of whether God exists is an age-old debate, both sides attempting to prove their viewpoint, but neither having factual proof. Those that argue for the existence of God claim that He is wholly good, omnipotent and omniscient. However, if that were true and God did possess all three of these attributes, how is it that evil exists in the world? There is pain and suffering, crime and natural disasters that occur daily. With that being said, why does evil exist?…

    • 690 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Theology 202 Essay 1
    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Theology 202 Essay 1

    The question of evil is a common hot button topic among atheists and non-Christians who attempt to disprove Christianity. They argue that an omnipotent and omniscient God cannot exist in a world with so much evil. The argument is used by them to try to prove that Christianity is “internally self-contradictory and thereby to be rejected.” Many claim that a benevolent and caring God would certainly not create evil or allow it to flourish in the world that He created. So, the problem of evil is how to explain that there can be a perfect, all-powerful, and all-loving God that exists in a world with so much moral and natural evil.…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Mackie's Argument For The Existence Of Evil
    • 1952 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Mackie's Argument For The Existence Of Evil

    The first standpoint is the evidential argument. Best introduced by Hume, it argues against the existence of God based on observations of the large amount of evil there is in the world relative to good. In Hume’s Argument from Evil, he writes, “all the goods in life united would not make a very happy man, but all the ills united would make a wretch indeed,” (pg. 234). The observations Hume makes of all the underserved suffering that occurs throughout the world paints a picture of evil so great that it appears to even over shadow the presence of good in the world. He argues that for the fact that evil is present in the world, God cannot exist or at least that God does not exist as the current omnipotent and omnibenevolent God that we generally perceive him to be. This is where the second standpoint of the problem of evil becomes clear. If evil exists, then at first impression, is God willing to prevent it but not able to? If so, then that would mean he was impotent. Alternatively, if he were able to but just wasn’t willing to, then that would make him malevolent. Finally, if he is both willing and able, then what is the purpose of all the evil we have in the universe (Epicurus, pg.…

    • 1952 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Sober's Argument For The Existence Of Evil
    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Sober's Argument For The Existence Of Evil

    The argument from evil is a deductively valid argument and states the following premises; One, “If God were to exist, then that being would be an all-powerful, all-knowing, and all-good” (Sober, 119). This first premise is an obvious statement, if there was a God those would be key characteristics that a God is set with. Two, “If an all-powerful, knowing, and good being existed, then there would be no evil” (Sober, 120). The second premise is true in the case that God existed; God would prevent evil since he is all-powerful being. Three, “There is evil” (Sober, 120).The third premise is also a fact, evil occurs whether it be natural or moral .Therefore, there is no God,” (Sober, 120). The conclusion that the existence of God cannot be is credible based on the fact that God would not allow evil.…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    A comparison of Augustinian Theodicy and Irenaean Theodicy
    • 1488 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A comparison of Augustinian Theodicy and Irenaean Theodicy

    The problem of evil is a significant and enduring philosophical and theological debate. A question is often raised and discussed: if God is both all-loving and all-powerful, then how can evils-including natural evil and moral evil---exist in our world? In response to the charge that the evils of the world are incompatible with God's omnipotence and perfect goodness, the word"theodicy" is coined to deal with the problem of evil. Usually it is an attempt to show that it is possible to affirm the omnipotence of God, the love of God, and the reality of evil without contradiction. Two of the most well-known and most frequently discussed theodicies are the Augustinian theodicy and the Irenaean theodicy.…

    • 1488 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Outline The Problem Of Evil
    • 2599 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Outline The Problem Of Evil

    Sometimes obstacles result in ones character being strengthened but other times they can be crushing leading to ones character being diminished and left incompetent so unable to grow and develop further. So it would seem any soul making is subject to an individual's temperament and particular way of dealing with a problem. Therefore this doesn't remove the contradiction, because there's evidence of people suffering and not getting better after it. This produces more problems as shows God to be selecting people who he should know would suffer immensely because of this evil. Irenaeus approach takes the blame off God for human suffering. This is what is needed to solve the problem of evil. He places the blame on human free will therefore avoiding questions of God's nature so in essence removing the contradiction. People accept that suffering is there for a reason and it's part of God's plan for soul…

    • 2599 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Why Does God Allow Evil?
    • 1771 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Why Does God Allow Evil?

    Many people dispute the true intentions of God, himself, since the beginning of mankind. Opposing and concurring arguments can be just as primitive. Regardless of personal perspective on any indefinite theory, it is undeniable that the controversy between good and evil will inevitably exist. Two dominant philosophers discussed in “The Problem of Evil” are Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz and David Hume. Both of these authors discuss interesting motives from both sides of the issue: why and why not God should allow evil.…

    • 1771 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The argument from evil
    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The argument from evil

    will then explain my counter stating that there are times when evil exists when there is no…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics