Preview

Pro or Con Private Gun Ownership

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
809 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pro or Con Private Gun Ownership
The United States Supreme Court has ruled that gun ownership is a fundamental right of the citizens of the United States. There are some citizens that feel that they can now own any weapon that they want. There are still certain guns that are illegal for the average citizen to own these are weapons that are regulated to the military and some law enforcement. There are Federal rules that must be observed and met prior to a person obtaining a gun. These are safety rules and rules that are meant to keep guns away from children and convicted felons as well as other irresponsible people who could possibly injure or kill another person. All legitimate gun owners understand that guns kill and there should be some form of gun control in order to prevent accidents from happening. Accidents are not the only reason for supporting gun control. Another reason is to prevent criminal’s, felons, the mentally ill, as well as abusers of wives or husbands from having access to weapons that can be used to intimidate or injure another person. Better law enforcement of the current gun laws should be used by the law enforcement agencies. If better law enforcement of current gun laws were done then that would show that law abiding people do not need to feel that they need guns for self-protection. Extreme gun laws as well as gun confiscation are not the answer to the gun problems facing us Better enforcement of present laws are. On June, 28, 2010 The United States Supreme Court handed down a decision by a vote of 5 to 4 that affirmed gun ownership as a fundamental right of the American people. Prior to this decision the cities and states felt that it was their rights and responsibility to be able to control who or what kind of guns the people could own. As in many instances the states only read part of the Constitution, and that part was the part that would..
APA Citation / Ronald Sadowski
Are Their Any Ligitimate Restrictions On Gun Owner. Anti Essays. Retrieved August 6, 2012,
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Chicago Handgun Laws Pros And Cons
    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Chicago Handgun Laws Pros And Cons

    On June 28, 2010, the Supreme Court issued its second major ruling on gun rights in three years, ensuring our federally protected right to keep and bear arms in all 50 states. The ruling states that the right to "keep and bear arms" is incorporated by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and applies to the states. No longer will State or local governments be allowed to ban most Americans from owning most types of handguns. The ruling effectively strikes down Chicago's handgun ban, not unlike the Washington D.C. law that was already ruled to be unconstitutional by the Supreme Court two years ago in D.C. v. Heller. Gun Rights Advocates hailed the decision across the Country as a major victory before the "conservative" majority…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Arguments Against Gun Control
    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Arguments Against Gun Control

    Those against gun control believe in these private protections. The Framers weren't able to predict everything the future would hold including the rapid growth in crime and violence. James Madison, who wrote the Constitution believed in the freedom and liberty of the individual, he discusses the advantages the private individual in America contained at the time with the right to bear arms compared to the many individuals of the nations in Europe. With the increase in violence and crime within the United States today the beliefs of James Madison and the framers become even stronger. In District of Columbia v. Heller (2008) the court recognizes that the government can regulate gun rights but that the Second Amendment does establish an individual right to bear arms. The Court said its decision should not be interpreted to question the right of government to: prohibit felons and the mentally ill from owning weapons, prohibit guns in schools or public buildings, ban certain categories of guns not commonly used for self-defense, and to establish certain other conditions on gun ownership. Thus, the Washington D.C. gun ban was overturned just as many other cities have done since then. If we eliminate this right to bear arms then we…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Gun Control Laws
    • 232 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Pros And Cons Of Gun Control Laws

    Many Americans believe that Gun-Control Laws should be enforced, because “Individuals do not need guns for protection; it is the role of local and federal government to protect the people through law enforcement agencies and the military.” (http://www.StudentNewsDaily.com) All Individuals deserve the right to carry a gun with them at all times, to use for protection. According to the Second Amendment in the Constitution, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” (https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/second_amendment) Obtaining a gun, gives one the sense of feeling safe and protected given any situation. No one knows when they may be “attacked” or in danger, and the protection they need from the government may not always be there to protect them. Every American must learn self-defense and use it when needed, they shouldn’t have to rely and anyone but themselves.…

    • 232 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Mexic Stricter Gun Control Laws In The United States
    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Mexic Stricter Gun Control Laws In The United States

    The role guns play in our society has long been a controversial topic for the past few years in the united states. There are those who believe that guns do not belong in the hands of citizens and there are those who believe that guns are the foundation that protects our rights and liberties stated in the Constitution. There are too many leading factors as to why there should not be any stricter gun control laws. Some of these factors are that they go against our fundamental rights of self defense, give too much power to the government, and could potentially increase crime rates in the united states.…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Should National Government Take Away Gun Rights
    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Should National Government Take Away Gun Rights

    Citizens of the United States have different views on gun control. Some citizens demand it because they think that all the violence will stop. Others think they will be safe if they are armed. Both stances are some what correct and they are both similar. If criminals that people are armed they might not try to rob or mug the citizens or committee crimes. But it also not good to have everyone armed. That's why it should be States rights so the people choose not the Government. This is popular sovereignty, it's government for the people by the people also their individual rights.…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Right To Bear Arms Pros And Cons
    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Right To Bear Arms Pros And Cons

    It has often been seen throughout history that when the United States government impedes on the rights of civilians, people tend to feel as though they are being stripped of their basic rights to life, liberty, and property. These basic rights are inalienable by law, according to the Declaration of Independence, and the government must tread lightly when making decisions in correspondence to them. In recent years laws and bills have been passed by legislation in regards to gun control with the intent of making the U.S. a safer place for all citizens who reside within its borders. However, the right to bear arms is protected by the second amendment and is highly favored by many American citizens making it a highly controversial topic. In the…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Gun Control In America Pros And Cons
    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Gun Control In America Pros And Cons

    The Second Amendment has brought up major arguments in American politics ever since 1876. Was it meant to insure that people in general have arms for personal safety, or was it to insure arms for the military service only? Gun control in America has its pros and cons, but the nation needs to decide which way the government goes on this topic because more school shootings will occur and terrorists can still get there hands on them.…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Gun Control In America
    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Gun Control In America

    Do firearms encourage misconduct? Many Americans choose to believe they do. With gun control being a controversial topic throughout society, it has its consequences. Because gun violence has recently been a prevalent issue, gun control is at the forefront of political leaders’ decision making, however, gun control places law abiding citizens at a disadvantage.…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Research Paper On Gun Control
    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Research Paper On Gun Control

    There is a old saying that guns dont kill people, people kill people. This is a known saying that comes out all the time when this conversation pops up.The media portrays gun control in a positive light, they believe that this is something that would work; I believe that gun control will never work and giving people guns to protect themselves and taking guns from people the public judges or deems unfit is a terrible idea. It is unsafe, and also endangering people's lives and is unfair, plus it is going against the second amendment which many have died to protect.…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Gun Control Pros And Cons
    • 1709 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Gun Control Pros And Cons

    The Second Amendment states, "A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed" (US Const., amend. 2). The amendment was adopted for a number of reasons, ranging from wanting to give U.S. residents the right to protect themselves in case the government waged war against the people, and the right to provide for their families by hunting with firearms, to ensuring their right to defend their homes against invaders. Basically, the second amendment was mainly put in place for our protection. The 2008 Supreme Court decision in District of Columbia v. Heller, upheld that right (No. 7-290. Supreme Ct. of the US. 26 June 2008). The Court 's ruling led to the lifting of a ban on handguns that had existed for 32 years. In an interview with the Washington Post, Lawyer Alan Gura noted that there had been "all sorts of predictions that there would be blood on the streets and carnage and all…

    • 1709 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Stricter Gun Laws In America
    • 1798 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Stricter Gun Laws In America

    Americans have a natural right with the Second amendment. Nelson Lund, a Professor at George Mason University School of Law, once stated how, “The right to self-defense and to the means of defending oneself is a basic natural right that grows out of the right to life and many gun control laws interfere with the ability of law-abiding citizens to defend themselves against violent criminals” (Gun Control - ProCon). People have a right to safety, and a right to defend themselves. Many citizens acknowledge and defend this right. By implements stricter gun laws the only thing being done is taking away some people's ability to defend themselves against others who won't follow any laws put into place. This walks hand in hand with the second amendment, which “protects an individual’s right to own guns” and states that guns are needed for self-defense from threats ranging from local criminals to foreign invaders. Along with the fact that gun ownership deters crime rather than causes more crime (Second Amendment). America was built upon freedom, freedom of religion, freedom of speech, and even the freedom to own guns and protect oneself from whomever may pose a threat. Bad people with guns can only be fought against by good people with the same abilities to have guns. Along with this the Fourteenth Amendment incorporates the fundamental right to keep and bear arms for the purpose of self-defense (Second Amendment). The second amendment is not the only amendment that protects a humans right to bear arms, here are other amendments this country was built upon that protect an american's right to protect…

    • 1798 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How To Take Gun Control Persuasive Essay
    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages

    How To Take Gun Control Persuasive Essay

    My first point is that gun control takes away many people's sense of security. According to the National Rifle Association (NRA), guns are used for self-defense 2.5 million times a year. The police cannot protect everyone all of the time. When a burglar breaks into your home, what would you use to protect yourself? 61% of men and 56% of women surveyed by Pew Research said that stricter gun laws would make it more difficult for people…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    We Need Gun Control Laws In The United States
    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages

    We Need Gun Control Laws In The United States

    Recently, there have been controversy about gun control due to gun crimes. These new laws not only affect people who opposes firearms, but especially for the people that relied on them for protection. Having a gun control law is making things way harder for people to protect them self, have guns to hunt, or to have them for any type of sports that there used in. Many people have been harmed with firearms but it was in the hands of a criminal they should put a law for those that misuse them, but the people using them right should have the rights to use them and they shouldn't have to have them taken because of someone else's mistake. Although many people have been harmed by misused firearms, the government should not pass new gun laws due to our second amendment and because guns provide protection.…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Gun Control Arguments
    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Gun Control Arguments

    They believe the laws that are in place are effective and need to become stricter. “To date, this system [Brady Bill] has prevented more than 200,000 gun purchases by people who had been in mental institutions, been dishonorably discharged from military service, were fugitives, or had a history of domestic abuse" (“Gun control,” World of Health, par. 35). For this reason, opponents argue that more and stricter gun control laws will result in less gun violence. It may be true that gun control laws help reduce gun violence. However, more and stricter gun control laws will reduce one’s Second Amendment rights. “...gun advocates favor freedom, choice and self-responsibility. If someone wishes to be prepared to defend himself, he should be free to do so. No one has the right to deprive others of the means of effective self-defense such as a handgun" (Stossel, par. 3). Not only would more and stricter gun control laws be unconstitutional, they would also be just as ineffective as the ones in place already. It is impossible to stop every single criminal from getting a gun. Gun control advocates often ignore that guns can save lives. “Today there are more than 300 million legally owned guns in America, and there were roughly 350,000 violent crimes involving firearms in 2011. In other words, the number of legal guns in private hands went up by a third, while the number of firearm-related crimes dropped by 74 percent." (Domenech, par. 24). The only thing that will stop gun violence is another person with a gun. More gun control laws are not the answer because criminals do not follow the laws that are in place…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Controversy Of Gun Control
    • 1477 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Controversy Of Gun Control

    The controversy of guns and gun control has been around for decades, and people have been making laws on this topic since 1791. There are multiple positions you can take on this topic, and most of those positions have sufficient evidence and reasoning for why it's good. With all the laws/restrictions on guns today, it's clear guns must have some effect on our nation. The definition of gun control is "laws or policies that regulate the manufacture, sale, transfer, possession, modification, or use of firearms". To summarize, gun control is the laws that let governemnt control the purchase and possesion of firearms. Due to multiple reasons, this idea has spawned much controversy. The first reason some people find it controversial is because they…

    • 1477 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics