Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

pro life abortion paper

Good Essays
501 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
pro life abortion paper
Writing Assignment 5 In Judith Thomson’s article on abortion, Judith states that she is “pro-life” when it comes to abortion. Argument like this is called “slippery slope arguments”. By this, she means that once you start to defend this topic, there is no stopping. She says that it would be arbitrary to draw the line on when a fetus becomes a human being. There are many differences between a “pro- choice” position on abortion and a “pro- life” position. People who are “pro- choice”, then they believe that it is the woman’s decision if she wants to have a child and carry it for nine months. If someone is “pro- life”, then they are against anyone getting an abortion. They believe that the fetus has the same rights as a human being. The argument the “pro- life” people strongly believe is that every undeveloped human is sacred and must be protected by the government. The “pro- choice” people argue that when a humans personhood cannot be proven in pregnancies, then the government does not have the right to prevent a woman her right to decide whether or not she wants to continue with the pregnancy. Her article focuses on where to draw the line on when a person becomes a human being, is it right when you are conceived, or when you are born, or at a certain stage in the womb. In her article, she says that once the fetus is conceived, it is a person, and starts to grow humanlike qualities in the mother. Judith says that it would be arbitrary to choose a point in the pregnancy on when the fetus becomes a human being. She says that the fetus is a human being from the moment of conception. When Judith Thomson brings up the unconscious violinist who needs your kidneys to extract poison from his blood. Now because you have been kidnaped and are now attached into the violinist for nine months, and if you unplug yourself, you will kill the violinist. But when the nine months are up, you are free to go, and the violinist will be perfectly okay. Judith says that, “[a]ll persons have a right to life, and the violinists is a person. Granted you have a right to decide what happens in and to your body, but a person's right to life outweighs your right to decide what happens in and to your body.” By her saying this she is asking whose life is more important and who has the final say in what to do. Are you acting immoral by detaching yourself from this violinist? Or are you acting charitable by keeping him attached? In conclusion, she says that every person and every fetus has every right to life. She says that the mother does have the right to decide on what happens to her body, but the right to life out ways what will happen to the mothers body, so abortion is wrong and should not be performed.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    or them felt they were ending a life. They are wise enough to know how they…

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    When a fetus gains moral status, or when the fetus becomes a person, is an unclear point that…

    • 1337 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The goal of Judith Jarvis Thomson in her defense of abortion is to sway the ideas of those who are against abortion by challenging the arguments they give for thinking so. She begins by stating a premise. “For the sake of the argument” a human embryo is a person. This premise is one of the arguments most opponents of abortion use, but as she points out, isn’t much of an argument at all. These people spend a lot of their time dwelling on the fact that the fetus is a person and hardly any time explaining how the fetus being a person has anything to with abortion being impermissible. In the same breath, she states that those who agree with abortion spend a lot of their time saying the fetus is in fact not a person. Either way, no argument is really formed. No reasons are given. For sake of challenging an actual argument, she is disregarding this issue. With this premise out of the way, she addresses the basic argument the pro-choice campaign believes. “Every person has a right to life. So the fetus has a right to life. No doubt the mother has a right to decide what shall happen in and to her body; everyone would grant that. But surely a person’s right to life is stronger and more stringent than the mother’s right to decide what happens in and to her body, and so outweighs it. So the fetus may not be killed; an abortion may not be performed.” The remainder of her paper is a series of analogies meant to challenge the basic argument mention above. When looking at the analogies separately, they are in no way related to the abortion topic, but the conclusions drawn from each can be applied. Because these examples aren’t directly related to the debate, our emotions won’t necessarily be involved and we can clearly think about what is the “right” thing to do for each specific scenario.…

    • 1957 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mary Anne Warren Thesis

    • 1518 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Mary Anne Warren in the chapter “On the Moral and Legal Status of Abortion and Postscript on Infanticide” discusses her views on pro-abortion. Warren explains how a fetus has not reached enough development to be considered a person. In order for a being to be considered a person they must have a list of five traits. The first is “consciousness”, specifically the facility to feel emotions externally and internally, such as pain. The second is “reasoning”, the capability to finding solutions to any difficult insistences, or situations. “Self-motivated activity” is the third trait, it consists of “activity which is relatively independent of either genetic or direct external control” (pp). The fourth trait is communication, “by whatever means, messages with an indefinite variety of types, that is, not just with an indefinite number of possible contents, but on indefinitely many possible topics” (pp). The final trait is “self-awareness and self-concepts” (pp). These five traits are what ultimately identifies humanity or personhood, and a fetus does not apply to these descriptions, therefor, a fetus is not considered a person – rather the mother of the fetus is, she has the right to decide whether to terminate the fetus or not. “A pregnant…

    • 1518 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    There are three main different views of the abortion debate. Most of the debate is if the fetus is considered a human or not is the main argument. For the pro-life side of the abortion debate, they mainly say that it should be considered human. Of course the pro-choice feel just the opposite usually. I personally, consider myself to be Pro-Life because I don’t think that we have enough information on the fetus and I could never consider killing a human (or even a fetus). I feel that the parents should have taken responsibility and taken the appropriate actions such as choosing abstinence, or at least using contraceptives. Hopefully, you will agree after looking at the opposition and their views/arguments against my view.…

    • 1859 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Paper #2: Jane English and the Analogy of the Hypnotized Attackers Mario P. Martinez November 6,1997 For our next paper I plan on discussing abortion as a social issue. I want to do this in the form of a critical paper This seems to be a very sticky subject and is one of the topics we had in our class that was very interesting to me with a lot of room for interpretation as to when it is or is not o.k. to abort the fetus if it should ever be done at all. The argument I plan to discuss is Jane English's analogy of the hypnotized attackers which was not one of our readings, but one I came across in some research I did for this upcoming paper.…

    • 2630 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pro-choice argues that choosing whether or not to have an abortion is the woman’s right and should not be limited by the government. They also argue that having access to legal and professional abortions is less risky, unlike having illegal abortions…

    • 232 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Abortion is the termination of an unborn baby’s life, while in its mother’s womb. This could be done at different times of pregnancy, from the day after conception, to the day that the baby is expected. Whether they are the same or not is argued about by opposing stances on the subject. There are two opposite stances on abortion. These stances are pro-choice and pro-life. Pro-choice supporters think of abortion as neither good or bad, but as a choice. They believe that abortion is a useful tool to make life easier for mothers who do not want their children. The choice to have an abortion is usually based on egoism, which is doing what is best for one’s self. People who are pro-choice believe that an unborn baby is not really alive at all, and…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Abortion Ethics Paper

    • 554 Words
    • 2 Pages

    P1: Whether or not the unborn has a right to life, it does not have a right to…

    • 554 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Abortion Pro Life Essay

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages

    People who think it’s the woman right to keep the embryo or to abort it are called Pro-choice. They believe that it’s not murder since it’s only an embryo and it is not a sin to abort it. After all it’s in the woman’s body she should decide if she would be responsible enough to give birth and give a life to new baby into the world. Yet there are the pro-life activists who are the people that are against abortion. in their opinion every human being has rights and even the unborn embryo. They want abortion to stay illegal.…

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are two different viewpoints on abortion. Pro-choice and pro-life. Let’s start with the easy one. Pro-life means that a person is completely against abortion. The pro-life viewpoint is the belief that abortion is considered taking the life a human, which would mean that life begins at conception. People may have this viewpoint for religious values, or even their personal moral values, and believe that abortion for anyone is wrong. Pro-choice is a little bit harder to describe. It doesn’t mean pro-abortion, it literally concerns the word choice. People that are pro-choice believe that it is a person’s personal decision as to whether or not they get an abortion. Somebody may be completely against abortion personally, but may still be pro-choice because they believe that it is a person’s decision and that right should not be…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Abortion Policy Paper

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In this document you will find my view on Abortion, and the policy I have proposed. You will also see the history and views of abortion.…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    child. “Those choosing legalization of abortion will argue that the developing fetus lacks a moral status…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Roe V. Wade History

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages

    These people firmly believe that an abortion is ending a life and is, therefore, murder and should be treated as such. These people are referred to be pro-life, and that means they oppose abortion. The other side, known as pro-choice are people who believe it should be the woman’s right to choose to either continue or to end the pregnancy and that there should not be laws banning abortion that interfere with the right of a woman to decide what is in her own best interest. Those in support of pro-choice may not believe that abortion is morally correct and might even view it as wrong but nonetheless, they believe it should be the woman’s…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pro-life is when individuals believe women should not have the right to abort a baby, pro-choice is the complete opposite. Pro-choice is the belief that a woman has the right to choose the best choice for her personal health, future, and moral sensibility. In my opinion abortion should be illegal. Life begins at conception, therefore I view the termination of a fetus as murder. Taking away one's life when they have no say is murder. How can you withdraw an innocent child's life? A failed abortion can result to a severely handicapped child. How can you attempt to damage a child for life causing your child to come out intellectually handicapped? How can you deliberately kill a miniscule baby because you decided to not use a form of birth control?…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays