Preview

Prison Reflection Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
289 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Prison Reflection Essay
On 07/16/2017, at approximately 1803 hours, I saw a group of inmates front of cell 21 in Durnago 5 B pod. I immediately went inside the pod and saw Inmate Mendoza-Zamora, Luis T364150 and Inmate Fluker, Roy T313174 were involved in a fight in Durango 5 B-pod cell 21 located at 3225 W. Gibson Ln. Phoenix AZ 85009.

Both inmates were escorted to the Durango Medical Clinic separately by myself (Officer Mahmud B3801), where they refused to be evaluated by RN Michovich CH022.

I watched the video on 07/16/2017 at approximately 1815 hours, where it shows that at approximately 1803 hours inmate Fluker and Inmate Mendoza were exchanging punches in cell 21.

I interviewed Inmate Mendoza at approximately 1905 hours. I read his Miranda Rights from my MCSO issued Miranda Rights Card to Inmate Mendoza and asked if he understood his right. Inmate Mendoza said, “Yes." I asked Inmate Mendoza again if he would like to voluntarily answer my questions. Inmate Mendoza said, “I don’t want to say anything."
…show more content…
I read his Miranda Rights from my MCSO issued Miranda Rights Card to Inmate Fluker and asked if he understood his right. Inmate Fluker said, “Yes." I asked Inmate Fluker again if he would like to voluntarily answer my questions. Inmate Fluker refused to answer. I then ended the interview.

Both inmates were offered and refused Administrative Restrictive Housing.

Both inmates were rehoused in different housing units and keep aways were placed in JMS.

DAR’s was written for both inmates and were served to them.

No photos were taken due to visible marks or bruising present on either inmate.

A video request was sent to FTO Michaud B1177 by SGT. Johanning

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Was Mr. Miranda fully apprised of his constitutional rights when the officers failed to inform Mr. Miranda that he could remain silent and have an attorney present at the interrogation?…

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Pelican Bay State Prison inmate, Jesse Perez, was recently awarded $25,000 in damages in reference to a case filed against correctional officers that were accused of acting in violation of the prisoner’s First Amendment rights. Perez was identified by officers at another prison as a member of the Mexican Mafia. After he was identified in 2005, Perez was transferred to Pelican Bay’s Security Housing Unit. The lawsuit was filed against the officers who claimed they identified him as a member of the Mexican Mafia. Perez claims that their determination and decision to reassign him was a violation of his rights by way of the constitution.…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Salinas V Texas

    • 1542 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Upon arriving at the station Salinas was brought into a room where the police would usually conduct interrogations. It was made clear to Salinas that he was free to leave at any time and his Miranda warnings were not read to him. In other words, it was clear that this was a “noncustodial interview.” The interview lasted approximately one hour. For most of the interview Salinas answered the officers questions, but when asked if his shotgun would match the shells recovered at the scene of the murder he instead fell silent, “looked down at the floor, shuffled his feet, bit his bottom lip, clenched his hands in his lap, and began to tighten up.”…

    • 1542 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Inmate Gonzalez Meeting

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Inmate Gonzalez was read his rights from an MCSO issued Miranda Rights warnings card. I asked Inmate Gonzalez if he understood his right and he replied, “Yes.” I then asked if he would voluntarily answer my questions and he said, “Yes”. I asked him if he knew what I found, He stated, “Yes, a shank.” I asked Inmate Gonzalez if the shank was his and he said, “No.” I asked Inmate Gonzalez who owned the shank. Inmate Gonzalez said, “Check the cameras and you’ll see who it belonged too.” I asked Inmate Gonzalez who made the shank, and he replied, “It’s not mine, I didn’t have anything to do with it.” I asked Inmate Gonzalez if the shank belonged to his cellmate (Inmate Quintero). Inmate Gonzalez refused to answer the question. I asked Inmate Gonzalez what the shank was intended to be used for. Inmate Gonzalez refused to answer any more…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Wood Murder Case

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages

    They have held a man in questioning on 1 million dollar bond. Terry Gilford was described as being a man of interest in Officer Woods shooting. He is a known felon. He was brought into court for unlawful use of a weapon by a felon, possession of a stolen firearm and possession of a controlled substance. He has only been held on questioning and not charged with the murder of Officer Wood.…

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    D Poad Reflective Account

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages

    During my safety and security checks in D Pod, I noticed the inmate BLANK was acting and behaving differently than usual. Not only she was sitting in her bunk bed with head down, her cell was neatly organized, and all of her belongings were packed. From my observation it appeared as if she were as if she were going somewhere. I asked inmate BLANK how she was doing and why there was a sudden change in her room appearance. She did not…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Riots and disturbances in prisons are not a new phenomenon in the United States and in the past decades there has been a continuation of these destructive and violent events. The prison riot at a phenomenon can be used in a number of ways. The term riot can be defined as the act of inmates taking control of a significant portion of a prison or correctional center for a significant period of time (American Correctional Association, 2010). Also, the term disturbance is considered a step down from riot because there are fewer inmates involved and there is no control or minimal control of a small portion of the correctional facility by inmates (American Correctional Association, 2010). One of the longest prisoner riots in the history of the United States occurred at the Arizona State Prison Lewis Complex in the Morey Unit. Located in Buckeye, Arizona the Morey Unit is designed to hold 800 prisoners of various security levels from low, medium, too high. This situation in the Morey Unit started in the early morning of January 18, 2004 in the kitchen where two inmates overtook civilian kitchen staff and correctional officers with prison made knives and shanks. The inmates who initiated this hostage situation was Steven Coy and Ricky Wassenaar, during this 15 day standoff two correctional officers were taken hostage, one female and one male. During the standoff the correctional officers were assaulted physically and sexually, but were eventually released alive. This riot and disturbance in the Morey Unit started as an escape attempt inmates Coy and Wassenaar, and when that plan got skewed it then turned into a long hostage situation, during which they were able to gain access to a guard tower with rifles and ammunition. The Morey Unit hostage situation could have been mitigated with four major methods of improved security measures, proper amount of staff and training, more experienced officers, and reduced overcrowding.…

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the first half of the interview, Cox and Allison, were certain about their testimony. After long hours of interrogation, the two witnesses have complied with the police’s story to avoid conflict and to be released from custody. The witnesses have also become suggestible during the interrogation, they have answered falsely in some leading questions to please the interviewer. An interview with an should not give any kind of stress to the witness. The police should help the witnesses remember by keeping them relax and asking relevant questions instead of using the coercive Reid…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Arizona vs Miranda

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Miranda was not given a full and effective warning of his rights. He was not told of his right to remain silent and his right to counsel. Miranda was found guilty of kidnaping and rape and was sentenced to 20-30 years imprisonment on each count. During the prosecution, Miranda’s court-appointed lawyer, Alvin Moore, objected that because of these facts, the confession was not truly voluntary and should be excluded. In the end of 1966, The Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision written by Chief Justice Earl Warren, ruled that the prosecution could not introduce Miranda's confession as evidence in a criminal trial because the police had failed to first informs Miranda of his right to an attorney and against self-incrimination. The Supreme Court of Arizona detailed the principles governing police interrogation. Arizona ruled that detained criminal suspects, prior to police questioning, must be informed of their constitutional right to an attorney and against self-incrimination.…

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The defendant presented to the evaluation session dressed appropriately in a jail-issued jumpsuit. His approach to the interview process was initially cooperative as he entered the interview room in the professional visitation section of the ADC. He was able to state his name, date of birth, and age. However, as the interview continued, his behavior grew less cooperative and increasingly guarded. He did not engage in reciprocal communication with the examiner. When questions were posed, Mr. Brooks would pause for several minutes staring blankly at the evaluator while processing the question posed. He would then respond, “Say what?” or “What you say?” Often, questions had to be repeated three times before Mr. Brooks would answer. Even then, his answers were not adequate responses to the…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Different ways of interrogations are used by officers to deal with suspects. Most often we do not know what is going on inside the interrogation room. The main purpose of the interrogation is to get possible answers that pacify their need of evidence to the case. Police are most criticizes of their way handling interrogations during custodial questioning which often uses deception to get whatever evidence needed. According to Skolnick and Leo there are eight types of interrogations deceptions. Interview versus interrogate which is the most subtle way of deception. Most often overlooked strategy the police always employ on suspects. By telling the suspects that he is free and can leave any time thus engages him to voluntary answering of questions that otherwise be considered an interrogation into a non-custodial interview. Miranda Warning, in order for a questioning to be custodial, police recite their Miranda rights. This routinely delivered phrase is always delivered in a recital flat monotone of voice that makes this warning a bureaucratic ritual. Police sometimes used this warning to soften up suspects. The Court in Miranda that police cannot trick or deceive a suspect into waiving Miranda rights. The misrepresenting the nature or seriousness of the Offense which police exaggerate, overstate or understate the offense in order for the suspect to compel in answering questions during custody. Role playing where police play the role of a compassionate friend, bother or father figure who understands the suspect’s situation in order to have their trust then later on seek the opportunity to let the suspect confess for the good of the investigation. Misinterpreting the moral seriousness of the offense is the heart of the interrogation method that propounded by Inbau, Reid and Buckley’s influential police training manual. Police interrogating the case offer suspects excuses or moral justification for their misconduct by providing the suspect with an external attribution…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Escobedo Vs Illinois Case

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages

    On January 30, 1960, Chicago police apprehended Danny Escobedo, without a warrant. He was suspected to be the killer in a murder investigation. Eleven days prior to Escobedo’s…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Interrogation has proven to be an effective means of seeking information since it involves giving a suspect an opportunity to express him or herself to prove their innocence. The suspects, however, should be informed of their rights and the consequences based on the information they provide. Failure to this, any information acquired from a suspect is regarded as inadmissible as evidence in a court of law. The United States constitution provides a legal standard into how interrogations are conducted through rights such as the presence of counsel and right against self-incrimination. Despite the measures put to guide interrogation procedures, interrogation techniques have evolved from establishing a rapport with the suspect to outright torture. However, effective interrogation techniques should obtain the required information while preserving the rights of the suspect.…

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Naysayers

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages

    6. “‘Well, of course law informant should be stopping, searching, and frisk him. Of course they should be keeping an eyes on him, he is a drug felon.’ And we knew we couldn’t put a criminal on the stand because they would be inevitable cross examine in front of a jury about their prior criminal history, their whole credibility would be challenged. So I tried to explain to him ‘I’m sorry, there is just no way I can represent you if you have a criminal record”…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Miranda Rights are part of a preventative criminal procedure rule that states law enforcement are required to administer Miranda Rights to an individual who is in custody and is subject to direct questioning for a criminal violation of law. When a person is detained or taken into custodial arrest and interrogated for a criminal offense, if he or she wishes to remain silent the individual must expressly state that he or she chooses to remain silent. In addition, if the individual asserts that he or she wishes to speak to an attorney or have an attorney present, police must then cease interrogations and wait until…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays