Principles of Corporate Rebranding
The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available at www.emeraldinsight.com/0309-0566.htm Principles of corporate rebranding Principles of corporate rebranding
Bill Merrilees and Dale Miller
Department of Marketing, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia
Abstract
Purpose – The paper aims to highlight the importance of corporate rebranding in branding practice, which is neglected in theoretical treatment, so an extended theory is to be developed.
Design/methodology/approach – From the literature, the existing state of the theory of corporate rebranding is articulated. That theory is extended by the development of six principles and by case research. The principles are illustrated in the case of a Canadian leather goods retailer which has implemented a major corporate rebranding strategy. The paper demonstrates the value of organisational single case studies as a precursor to further research.
Findings – The single case enables a more in-depth analysis of how branding principles were applied to corporate rebranding. All six principles were supported, indicating the need for maintaining core values and cultivating the brand, linking the existing brand with the revised brand, targeting new segments, getting stakeholder “buy-in”, achieving alignment of brand elements and the importance of promotion in awareness building.
Originality/value – Although corporate rebranding is often used narrowly in practice as renaming, this paper redresses the limited attempts to build theory in this area of marketing. It attempts to build a more sophisticated and substantial theory of corporate rebranding.
537
Received April 2006
Revised November 2006
Accepted March 2007
Keywords Brands, Corporate branding, Innovation, Case studies
Paper type Research paper
Introduction
Rebranding is ubiquitous in branding practice. Corporate rebranding, in its many facets of brand renewal, refreshment, makeover, reinvention, renaming and
Bill Merrilees and Dale Miller
Department of Marketing, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia
Abstract
Purpose – The paper aims to highlight the importance of corporate rebranding in branding practice, which is neglected in theoretical treatment, so an extended theory is to be developed.
Design/methodology/approach – From the literature, the existing state of the theory of corporate rebranding is articulated. That theory is extended by the development of six principles and by case research. The principles are illustrated in the case of a Canadian leather goods retailer which has implemented a major corporate rebranding strategy. The paper demonstrates the value of organisational single case studies as a precursor to further research.
Findings – The single case enables a more in-depth analysis of how branding principles were applied to corporate rebranding. All six principles were supported, indicating the need for maintaining core values and cultivating the brand, linking the existing brand with the revised brand, targeting new segments, getting stakeholder “buy-in”, achieving alignment of brand elements and the importance of promotion in awareness building.
Originality/value – Although corporate rebranding is often used narrowly in practice as renaming, this paper redresses the limited attempts to build theory in this area of marketing. It attempts to build a more sophisticated and substantial theory of corporate rebranding.
537
Received April 2006
Revised November 2006
Accepted March 2007
Keywords Brands, Corporate branding, Innovation, Case studies
Paper type Research paper
Introduction
Rebranding is ubiquitous in branding practice. Corporate rebranding, in its many facets of brand renewal, refreshment, makeover, reinvention, renaming and
References: Ailawadi, K. and Keller, K. (2004), “Understanding retail branding: conceptual insights and priorities”, Journal of Retailing, Vol Balmer, J. (Ed.) (2003), “Special Issue: Corporate and service brands”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol Balmer, J. and Greyser, S. (2002), “Managing the multiple identities of the corporation”, California Management Review, Vol Balmer, J. and Greyser, S. (Eds) (2003), Revealing the Corporation, London, Routledge. Balmer, J., Mukherjee, A., Greyser, S. and Jenster, P. (Eds) (2006), “Special Issue: Corporate marketing: integrating corporate identity, corporate branding, corporate communications, Bergstrom, A., Blumenthal, D. and Crothers, S. (2002), “Why internal branding matters: the case of Saab”, Corporate Reputation Review, Vol Berry, L. (2000), “Cultivating service brand equity”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol Berry, N. (1988), “Revitalizing brands”, Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 5 No. 3, pp. 15-20. Beverland, M. and Ewing, M. (2005), “Slowing the adoption and diffusion process to enhance brand repositioning: the consumer driven repositioning of Dunlop Volley”, Business Birtwistle, G. and Freathy, P. (1998), “More than just a name above the shop: a comparison of the branding strategies of two UK fashion retailers”, International Journal of Retail & Burt, S. and Sparks, L. (2002), “Corporate branding, retailing, and retail internationalization”, Corporate Reputation Review, Vol Christensen, C. (1997), The Innovator’s Dilemma, Harper Collins, New York, NY. Daly, A. and Moloney, D. (2004), “Managing corporate rebranding”, Irish Marketing Review, Vol Davies, G. and Chun, R. (2002), “Gaps between the internal and external perceptions of the corporate brand”, Corporate Reputation Review, Vol Davis, S. and Dunn, M. (2002), Building the Brand-Driven Business, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA. Dawkins, S. (2002), “Acton comes to Toronto”, Retail News and Views, Retail Advertising and Marketing Club, Toronto, Fall, p de Chernatony, L. (2002), “Would a brand smell any sweeter by a corporate name?”, Corporate Reputation Review, Vol de Chernatony, L. (2006), From Brand Vision to Brand Evaluation: The Strategic Process of Growing and Strengthening Brands, 2nd ed., Elsevier, Oxford. de Chernatony, L. and Dall’Olmo Riley, F. (1998), “Modelling the components of the brand”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol de Chernatony, L. and Segal-Horn, S. (2003), “The criteria for successful services brands”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol de Chernatony, L., Drury, S. and Segal-Horn, S. (2005), “Using triangulation to assess and identify successful services brands”, The Services Industries Journal, Vol Doty, D. and Glick, W. (1994), “Typologies as a unique form of theory building: toward understanding and modelling”, Academy of Management Review, Vol Dowling, G. (1994), Corporate Reputations, Kogan Page, London. Eisenhardt, K. (1989), “Building theories from case study research”, Academy of Management Review, Vol Ewing, M., Fowlds, D. and Shepherd, I. (1995), “Renaissance: a case study in brand revitalization and strategic realignment”, Journal of Product & Brand Management, Vol Fombrun, C. (1996), Reputation: Realizing Value from the Corporate Image, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA. Gapp, R. and Merrilees, B. (2006), “Important factors to consider when using internal branding as a management strategy: a healthcare case study”, Journal of Brand Management, Vol Gregory, J. (1991), Marketing Corporate Image, NTC Business Books, Lincolnwood, IL. Hatch, M. and Schultz, M. (2001), “Are the strategic stars aligned for your corporate brand?”, Harvard Business Review, February, pp Hatch, M. and Schultz, M. (2003), “Bringing the corporation into corporate branding”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol Ind, N. (1997), The Corporate Brand, Macmillan, London. Ind, N. (2004), Living the Brand: How to Transform Every Member of Your Organization into a Brand Champion, 2nd ed., Kogan Page, London. Joachimsthaler, E. and Aaker, D. (1999), “Building brands without mass media”, Harvard Business Review on Brand Management, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, Kapferer, J.-N. (1997), Strategic Brand Management: Creating and Sustaining Brand Equity Long Term, Kogan Page, London.